Is Labral Size Predictive of Failure With Repair in Hip Arthroscopy?

Joseph C. Brinkman, Benjamin G. Domb, Aaron J. Krych, Bruce A. Levy, Justin L. Makovicka, Matthew Neville, David E. Hartigan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

Purpose: To assess whether labral size is predictive of labral repair failure or shows an association with patient outcomes after hip arthroscopy. Methods: We performed a retrospective chart review of patients who underwent arthroscopic hip labral repair. Labral size was measured in 4 quadrants with an arthroscopic probe. The average size across torn labral segments was assessed for failure as determined by the change in patient-reported outcomes, the rate at which subjects achieved the minimal clinically important difference and patient acceptable symptomatic state, and the need for additional surgery. Outcomes were evaluated for any continuous correlation as well as significant differences between the middle 50% of labral sizes and classes of labral sizes derived from upper and lower quartile and decile ranges. Included hips were those from patients aged between 18 and 55 years with 2-year postoperative follow-up and lateral center-edge angles between 25° and 40°. Results: The study included 571 hips. Labral width did not show a significant difference between hips requiring revision and those not requiring revision (P = .4054). No significant correlation was found between labral width and the change in the International Hip Outcome Tool 12 score (R2 = 0.05780), modified Harris Hip Score (R2 = 0.19826), or Nonarthritic Hip Score (R2 = 0.23543) from preoperatively to 2 years postoperatively. Hips with labral sizes in the upper decile of our cohort showed significantly decreased improvement in the International Hip Outcome Tool 12 score (P = .0287) and Nonarthritic Hip Score (P = .0490) compared with the middle 50% of labral sizes. No statistically significant difference was found in the rate at which the groups achieved the minimal clinically important difference or patient acceptable symptomatic state. Conclusions: Hypertrophic labra in the largest 10th percentile showed lower postoperative outcome scores. However, no detectable clinical benefit was found in terms of patient-perceived clinical difference or acceptable symptomatic state. For most patients, labral size does not appear to significantly alter patient outcomes or the need for arthroplasty. Level of Evidence: Level IV, retrospective case series.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2147-2157
Number of pages11
JournalArthroscopy - Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery
Volume36
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 2020

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Is Labral Size Predictive of Failure With Repair in Hip Arthroscopy?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this