Is all unstable angina the same? Insights from the Coronary Angioplasty Versus Excisional Atherectomy Trial (CAVEAT-I)

Robert A. Harrington, Robert M. Califf, David Holmes, Karen S. Pieper, A. Michael Lincoff, Lisa G. Berdan, Trevor D. Thompson, Eric J. Topol

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Certain characteristics of unstable angina have been associated with worse clinical outcomes after percutaneous revascularization procedures. Methods and Results: We compared outcomes of patients with (n = 690) and those without (n = 320) unstable angina in the Coronary Angioplasty Versus Excisional Atherectomy Trial (CAVEAT-I) by unstable angina subgroup: rest chest pain, postinfarction chest pain, chest pain with ischemic electrocardiographic changes, chest pain with recent acceleration, and no chest pain. Regression models were constructed to predict in-hospital and 6- month composite end point death, infarction, bypass surgery, percutaneous revascularization, and abrupt closure (in-hospital) or restenosis (6 months) for each subgroup. Only chest pain with electrocardiographic changes predicted the composite in-hospital outcome (24% vs 17% with no Chest pain, P = .0374.) This subgroup also had a greater acute gain, more late loss, and more restenosis than patients in the other subgroups. Rest chest pain carried a higher incidence of the composite 6-month outcome (39.9% vs 29% with no chest pain, P = .0472). For all unstable angina categories, atherectomy was associated with worse overall outcomes than angioplasty. Conclusions: Patients with unstable angina have more complications of percutaneous revascularization than patients without unstable angina, but event rates vary by anginal subgroup. The clinical presentation may help to identify unstable angina patients at particularly high risk for adverse outcomes.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)227-233
Number of pages7
JournalAmerican Heart Journal
Volume137
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1999
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Atherectomy
Unstable Angina
Chest Pain
Angioplasty
Health Facility Closure
Infarction

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cite this

Is all unstable angina the same? Insights from the Coronary Angioplasty Versus Excisional Atherectomy Trial (CAVEAT-I). / Harrington, Robert A.; Califf, Robert M.; Holmes, David; Pieper, Karen S.; Lincoff, A. Michael; Berdan, Lisa G.; Thompson, Trevor D.; Topol, Eric J.

In: American Heart Journal, Vol. 137, No. 2, 01.01.1999, p. 227-233.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Harrington, RA, Califf, RM, Holmes, D, Pieper, KS, Lincoff, AM, Berdan, LG, Thompson, TD & Topol, EJ 1999, 'Is all unstable angina the same? Insights from the Coronary Angioplasty Versus Excisional Atherectomy Trial (CAVEAT-I)', American Heart Journal, vol. 137, no. 2, pp. 227-233. https://doi.org/10.1053/hj.1999.v137.90600
Harrington, Robert A. ; Califf, Robert M. ; Holmes, David ; Pieper, Karen S. ; Lincoff, A. Michael ; Berdan, Lisa G. ; Thompson, Trevor D. ; Topol, Eric J. / Is all unstable angina the same? Insights from the Coronary Angioplasty Versus Excisional Atherectomy Trial (CAVEAT-I). In: American Heart Journal. 1999 ; Vol. 137, No. 2. pp. 227-233.
@article{778e1ee98b33419f91eec90f269e2103,
title = "Is all unstable angina the same? Insights from the Coronary Angioplasty Versus Excisional Atherectomy Trial (CAVEAT-I)",
abstract = "Background: Certain characteristics of unstable angina have been associated with worse clinical outcomes after percutaneous revascularization procedures. Methods and Results: We compared outcomes of patients with (n = 690) and those without (n = 320) unstable angina in the Coronary Angioplasty Versus Excisional Atherectomy Trial (CAVEAT-I) by unstable angina subgroup: rest chest pain, postinfarction chest pain, chest pain with ischemic electrocardiographic changes, chest pain with recent acceleration, and no chest pain. Regression models were constructed to predict in-hospital and 6- month composite end point death, infarction, bypass surgery, percutaneous revascularization, and abrupt closure (in-hospital) or restenosis (6 months) for each subgroup. Only chest pain with electrocardiographic changes predicted the composite in-hospital outcome (24{\%} vs 17{\%} with no Chest pain, P = .0374.) This subgroup also had a greater acute gain, more late loss, and more restenosis than patients in the other subgroups. Rest chest pain carried a higher incidence of the composite 6-month outcome (39.9{\%} vs 29{\%} with no chest pain, P = .0472). For all unstable angina categories, atherectomy was associated with worse overall outcomes than angioplasty. Conclusions: Patients with unstable angina have more complications of percutaneous revascularization than patients without unstable angina, but event rates vary by anginal subgroup. The clinical presentation may help to identify unstable angina patients at particularly high risk for adverse outcomes.",
author = "Harrington, {Robert A.} and Califf, {Robert M.} and David Holmes and Pieper, {Karen S.} and Lincoff, {A. Michael} and Berdan, {Lisa G.} and Thompson, {Trevor D.} and Topol, {Eric J.}",
year = "1999",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1053/hj.1999.v137.90600",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "137",
pages = "227--233",
journal = "American Heart Journal",
issn = "0002-8703",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Is all unstable angina the same? Insights from the Coronary Angioplasty Versus Excisional Atherectomy Trial (CAVEAT-I)

AU - Harrington, Robert A.

AU - Califf, Robert M.

AU - Holmes, David

AU - Pieper, Karen S.

AU - Lincoff, A. Michael

AU - Berdan, Lisa G.

AU - Thompson, Trevor D.

AU - Topol, Eric J.

PY - 1999/1/1

Y1 - 1999/1/1

N2 - Background: Certain characteristics of unstable angina have been associated with worse clinical outcomes after percutaneous revascularization procedures. Methods and Results: We compared outcomes of patients with (n = 690) and those without (n = 320) unstable angina in the Coronary Angioplasty Versus Excisional Atherectomy Trial (CAVEAT-I) by unstable angina subgroup: rest chest pain, postinfarction chest pain, chest pain with ischemic electrocardiographic changes, chest pain with recent acceleration, and no chest pain. Regression models were constructed to predict in-hospital and 6- month composite end point death, infarction, bypass surgery, percutaneous revascularization, and abrupt closure (in-hospital) or restenosis (6 months) for each subgroup. Only chest pain with electrocardiographic changes predicted the composite in-hospital outcome (24% vs 17% with no Chest pain, P = .0374.) This subgroup also had a greater acute gain, more late loss, and more restenosis than patients in the other subgroups. Rest chest pain carried a higher incidence of the composite 6-month outcome (39.9% vs 29% with no chest pain, P = .0472). For all unstable angina categories, atherectomy was associated with worse overall outcomes than angioplasty. Conclusions: Patients with unstable angina have more complications of percutaneous revascularization than patients without unstable angina, but event rates vary by anginal subgroup. The clinical presentation may help to identify unstable angina patients at particularly high risk for adverse outcomes.

AB - Background: Certain characteristics of unstable angina have been associated with worse clinical outcomes after percutaneous revascularization procedures. Methods and Results: We compared outcomes of patients with (n = 690) and those without (n = 320) unstable angina in the Coronary Angioplasty Versus Excisional Atherectomy Trial (CAVEAT-I) by unstable angina subgroup: rest chest pain, postinfarction chest pain, chest pain with ischemic electrocardiographic changes, chest pain with recent acceleration, and no chest pain. Regression models were constructed to predict in-hospital and 6- month composite end point death, infarction, bypass surgery, percutaneous revascularization, and abrupt closure (in-hospital) or restenosis (6 months) for each subgroup. Only chest pain with electrocardiographic changes predicted the composite in-hospital outcome (24% vs 17% with no Chest pain, P = .0374.) This subgroup also had a greater acute gain, more late loss, and more restenosis than patients in the other subgroups. Rest chest pain carried a higher incidence of the composite 6-month outcome (39.9% vs 29% with no chest pain, P = .0472). For all unstable angina categories, atherectomy was associated with worse overall outcomes than angioplasty. Conclusions: Patients with unstable angina have more complications of percutaneous revascularization than patients without unstable angina, but event rates vary by anginal subgroup. The clinical presentation may help to identify unstable angina patients at particularly high risk for adverse outcomes.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0032927889&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0032927889&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1053/hj.1999.v137.90600

DO - 10.1053/hj.1999.v137.90600

M3 - Article

C2 - 9924155

AN - SCOPUS:0032927889

VL - 137

SP - 227

EP - 233

JO - American Heart Journal

JF - American Heart Journal

SN - 0002-8703

IS - 2

ER -