Insights into normal and disordered bowel habits from bowel diaries

Adil Eddie Bharucha, Barbara M. Seide, Alan R. Zinsmeister, L. Joseph Melton

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

28 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: While symptom questionnaires provide a snapshot of bowel habits, they may not reflect day-to-day variations or the relationship between bowel symptoms and stool form. AIM: To assess bowel habits by daily diaries in women with and without functional bowel disorders. METHOD: From a community-based survey among Olmsted County, MN, women, 278 randomly selected subjects were interviewed by a gastroenterologist, who completed a bowel symptom questionnaire. Subjects also maintained bowel diaries for 2 wk. RESULTS: Among 278 subjects, questionnaires revealed diarrhea (26%), constipation (21%), or neither (53%). Asymptomatic subjects reported bowel symptoms (e.g., urgency) infrequently (i.e., <25% of the time) and generally for hard or loose stools. Urgency for soft, formed stools (i.e., Bristol form = 4) was more prevalent in subjects with diarrhea (31%) and constipation (27%) than in normals (16%). Stool form, straining to begin (odds ratio [OR] 4.1, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.7-10.2) and end (OR 4.7, 95% CI 1.6-15.2) defecation increased the odds for constipation. Straining to end defecation (OR 3.7, 95% CI 1.2-12.0), increased stool frequency (OR 1.9, 95% CI 1.02-3.7), incomplete evacuation (OR 2.2, 95% CI 1.04-4.6), and rectal urgency (OR 3.1, 95% CI 1.4-6.6) increased the odds for diarrhea. In contrast, variations in stool frequency and form were not useful for discriminating between health and disease. CONCLUSIONS: Bowel symptoms occur in association with, but are only partly explained by, stool form disturbances. These observations support a role for other pathophysiological mechanisms in functional bowel disorders.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)692-698
Number of pages7
JournalAmerican Journal of Gastroenterology
Volume103
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2008

Fingerprint

Habits
Odds Ratio
Confidence Intervals
Constipation
Diarrhea
Defecation
Surveys and Questionnaires
Health

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Gastroenterology

Cite this

Insights into normal and disordered bowel habits from bowel diaries. / Bharucha, Adil Eddie; Seide, Barbara M.; Zinsmeister, Alan R.; Melton, L. Joseph.

In: American Journal of Gastroenterology, Vol. 103, No. 3, 03.2008, p. 692-698.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Bharucha, Adil Eddie ; Seide, Barbara M. ; Zinsmeister, Alan R. ; Melton, L. Joseph. / Insights into normal and disordered bowel habits from bowel diaries. In: American Journal of Gastroenterology. 2008 ; Vol. 103, No. 3. pp. 692-698.
@article{1c077d6420a841309183a1bdd42ca74e,
title = "Insights into normal and disordered bowel habits from bowel diaries",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: While symptom questionnaires provide a snapshot of bowel habits, they may not reflect day-to-day variations or the relationship between bowel symptoms and stool form. AIM: To assess bowel habits by daily diaries in women with and without functional bowel disorders. METHOD: From a community-based survey among Olmsted County, MN, women, 278 randomly selected subjects were interviewed by a gastroenterologist, who completed a bowel symptom questionnaire. Subjects also maintained bowel diaries for 2 wk. RESULTS: Among 278 subjects, questionnaires revealed diarrhea (26{\%}), constipation (21{\%}), or neither (53{\%}). Asymptomatic subjects reported bowel symptoms (e.g., urgency) infrequently (i.e., <25{\%} of the time) and generally for hard or loose stools. Urgency for soft, formed stools (i.e., Bristol form = 4) was more prevalent in subjects with diarrhea (31{\%}) and constipation (27{\%}) than in normals (16{\%}). Stool form, straining to begin (odds ratio [OR] 4.1, 95{\%} confidence interval [CI] 1.7-10.2) and end (OR 4.7, 95{\%} CI 1.6-15.2) defecation increased the odds for constipation. Straining to end defecation (OR 3.7, 95{\%} CI 1.2-12.0), increased stool frequency (OR 1.9, 95{\%} CI 1.02-3.7), incomplete evacuation (OR 2.2, 95{\%} CI 1.04-4.6), and rectal urgency (OR 3.1, 95{\%} CI 1.4-6.6) increased the odds for diarrhea. In contrast, variations in stool frequency and form were not useful for discriminating between health and disease. CONCLUSIONS: Bowel symptoms occur in association with, but are only partly explained by, stool form disturbances. These observations support a role for other pathophysiological mechanisms in functional bowel disorders.",
author = "Bharucha, {Adil Eddie} and Seide, {Barbara M.} and Zinsmeister, {Alan R.} and Melton, {L. Joseph}",
year = "2008",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1111/j.1572-0241.2007.01631.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "103",
pages = "692--698",
journal = "American Journal of Gastroenterology",
issn = "0002-9270",
publisher = "Nature Publishing Group",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Insights into normal and disordered bowel habits from bowel diaries

AU - Bharucha, Adil Eddie

AU - Seide, Barbara M.

AU - Zinsmeister, Alan R.

AU - Melton, L. Joseph

PY - 2008/3

Y1 - 2008/3

N2 - BACKGROUND: While symptom questionnaires provide a snapshot of bowel habits, they may not reflect day-to-day variations or the relationship between bowel symptoms and stool form. AIM: To assess bowel habits by daily diaries in women with and without functional bowel disorders. METHOD: From a community-based survey among Olmsted County, MN, women, 278 randomly selected subjects were interviewed by a gastroenterologist, who completed a bowel symptom questionnaire. Subjects also maintained bowel diaries for 2 wk. RESULTS: Among 278 subjects, questionnaires revealed diarrhea (26%), constipation (21%), or neither (53%). Asymptomatic subjects reported bowel symptoms (e.g., urgency) infrequently (i.e., <25% of the time) and generally for hard or loose stools. Urgency for soft, formed stools (i.e., Bristol form = 4) was more prevalent in subjects with diarrhea (31%) and constipation (27%) than in normals (16%). Stool form, straining to begin (odds ratio [OR] 4.1, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.7-10.2) and end (OR 4.7, 95% CI 1.6-15.2) defecation increased the odds for constipation. Straining to end defecation (OR 3.7, 95% CI 1.2-12.0), increased stool frequency (OR 1.9, 95% CI 1.02-3.7), incomplete evacuation (OR 2.2, 95% CI 1.04-4.6), and rectal urgency (OR 3.1, 95% CI 1.4-6.6) increased the odds for diarrhea. In contrast, variations in stool frequency and form were not useful for discriminating between health and disease. CONCLUSIONS: Bowel symptoms occur in association with, but are only partly explained by, stool form disturbances. These observations support a role for other pathophysiological mechanisms in functional bowel disorders.

AB - BACKGROUND: While symptom questionnaires provide a snapshot of bowel habits, they may not reflect day-to-day variations or the relationship between bowel symptoms and stool form. AIM: To assess bowel habits by daily diaries in women with and without functional bowel disorders. METHOD: From a community-based survey among Olmsted County, MN, women, 278 randomly selected subjects were interviewed by a gastroenterologist, who completed a bowel symptom questionnaire. Subjects also maintained bowel diaries for 2 wk. RESULTS: Among 278 subjects, questionnaires revealed diarrhea (26%), constipation (21%), or neither (53%). Asymptomatic subjects reported bowel symptoms (e.g., urgency) infrequently (i.e., <25% of the time) and generally for hard or loose stools. Urgency for soft, formed stools (i.e., Bristol form = 4) was more prevalent in subjects with diarrhea (31%) and constipation (27%) than in normals (16%). Stool form, straining to begin (odds ratio [OR] 4.1, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.7-10.2) and end (OR 4.7, 95% CI 1.6-15.2) defecation increased the odds for constipation. Straining to end defecation (OR 3.7, 95% CI 1.2-12.0), increased stool frequency (OR 1.9, 95% CI 1.02-3.7), incomplete evacuation (OR 2.2, 95% CI 1.04-4.6), and rectal urgency (OR 3.1, 95% CI 1.4-6.6) increased the odds for diarrhea. In contrast, variations in stool frequency and form were not useful for discriminating between health and disease. CONCLUSIONS: Bowel symptoms occur in association with, but are only partly explained by, stool form disturbances. These observations support a role for other pathophysiological mechanisms in functional bowel disorders.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=40949139316&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=40949139316&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2007.01631.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2007.01631.x

M3 - Article

C2 - 18021288

AN - SCOPUS:40949139316

VL - 103

SP - 692

EP - 698

JO - American Journal of Gastroenterology

JF - American Journal of Gastroenterology

SN - 0002-9270

IS - 3

ER -