Infusion of collaborative inquiry throughout a biology curriculum increases student learning: A four-year study of "Teams and Streams"

Douglas B. Luckie, Joseph Maleszewski, Sarah D. Loznak, Marija Krha

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

59 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Are traditional laboratories in the core introductory biology courses teaching physiology majors the art and trade of science, or simply leaving them with a memory of trivial experiments done for unknown reasons? Our students, a population dominated by premed and physiology majors, think the latter and have encouraged us to challenge this model, and it turns out scientists and education researchers agree with our students (4, 31, 32). In an effort to remedy this, we began a long-term redesign of the introductory biology sequence to become what is now a sequence of inquiry laboratories we term "Teams and Streams" (TS). In these TS inquiry labs, student research teams pose a scientific question/hypothesis, propose an experimental design, perform multi-week investigations and then present their findings in various forms (web, interviews, and papers). The response to this classroom laboratory design has been overwhelmingly positive. In a qualitative study of student opinion (where 260 student responses were studied), surveys conducted at the end of semesters where traditional scripted labs were used (n = 70 comments) had predominately negative opinions (80% negative responses), whereas the reverse was true for students (n = 190 comments) who participated in courses using the TS inquiry labs (78% positive responses). In a quantitative assessment of content knowledge, students who participated in new TS inquiry labs (n = 245) outscored their peers in traditional labs (n = 86) on Medical College Admission Test-style standardized exams (59.3 ± 0.8% vs. 48.9 ± 1.3%, respectively; P < 0.0001). We believe these quantitative data support the qualitative findings and suggest the TS inquiry lab approach increases student learning.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)199-209
Number of pages11
JournalAmerican Journal of Physiology - Advances in Physiology Education
Volume28
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2004
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Curriculum
Learning
Students
College Admission Test
Art
Teaching
Research Design
Research Personnel
Interviews
Education
Research
Population

Keywords

  • Cooperative
  • Laboratory
  • Research
  • Undergraduate

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Physiology

Cite this

Infusion of collaborative inquiry throughout a biology curriculum increases student learning : A four-year study of "Teams and Streams". / Luckie, Douglas B.; Maleszewski, Joseph; Loznak, Sarah D.; Krha, Marija.

In: American Journal of Physiology - Advances in Physiology Education, Vol. 28, No. 4, 01.12.2004, p. 199-209.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{fff4f791fbf641c3a49e54a3b84411e6,
title = "Infusion of collaborative inquiry throughout a biology curriculum increases student learning: A four-year study of {"}Teams and Streams{"}",
abstract = "Are traditional laboratories in the core introductory biology courses teaching physiology majors the art and trade of science, or simply leaving them with a memory of trivial experiments done for unknown reasons? Our students, a population dominated by premed and physiology majors, think the latter and have encouraged us to challenge this model, and it turns out scientists and education researchers agree with our students (4, 31, 32). In an effort to remedy this, we began a long-term redesign of the introductory biology sequence to become what is now a sequence of inquiry laboratories we term {"}Teams and Streams{"} (TS). In these TS inquiry labs, student research teams pose a scientific question/hypothesis, propose an experimental design, perform multi-week investigations and then present their findings in various forms (web, interviews, and papers). The response to this classroom laboratory design has been overwhelmingly positive. In a qualitative study of student opinion (where 260 student responses were studied), surveys conducted at the end of semesters where traditional scripted labs were used (n = 70 comments) had predominately negative opinions (80{\%} negative responses), whereas the reverse was true for students (n = 190 comments) who participated in courses using the TS inquiry labs (78{\%} positive responses). In a quantitative assessment of content knowledge, students who participated in new TS inquiry labs (n = 245) outscored their peers in traditional labs (n = 86) on Medical College Admission Test-style standardized exams (59.3 ± 0.8{\%} vs. 48.9 ± 1.3{\%}, respectively; P < 0.0001). We believe these quantitative data support the qualitative findings and suggest the TS inquiry lab approach increases student learning.",
keywords = "Cooperative, Laboratory, Research, Undergraduate",
author = "Luckie, {Douglas B.} and Joseph Maleszewski and Loznak, {Sarah D.} and Marija Krha",
year = "2004",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1152/advan.00025.2004",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "28",
pages = "199--209",
journal = "American Journal of Physiology - Advances in Physiology Education",
issn = "1043-4046",
publisher = "American Physiological Society",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Infusion of collaborative inquiry throughout a biology curriculum increases student learning

T2 - A four-year study of "Teams and Streams"

AU - Luckie, Douglas B.

AU - Maleszewski, Joseph

AU - Loznak, Sarah D.

AU - Krha, Marija

PY - 2004/12/1

Y1 - 2004/12/1

N2 - Are traditional laboratories in the core introductory biology courses teaching physiology majors the art and trade of science, or simply leaving them with a memory of trivial experiments done for unknown reasons? Our students, a population dominated by premed and physiology majors, think the latter and have encouraged us to challenge this model, and it turns out scientists and education researchers agree with our students (4, 31, 32). In an effort to remedy this, we began a long-term redesign of the introductory biology sequence to become what is now a sequence of inquiry laboratories we term "Teams and Streams" (TS). In these TS inquiry labs, student research teams pose a scientific question/hypothesis, propose an experimental design, perform multi-week investigations and then present their findings in various forms (web, interviews, and papers). The response to this classroom laboratory design has been overwhelmingly positive. In a qualitative study of student opinion (where 260 student responses were studied), surveys conducted at the end of semesters where traditional scripted labs were used (n = 70 comments) had predominately negative opinions (80% negative responses), whereas the reverse was true for students (n = 190 comments) who participated in courses using the TS inquiry labs (78% positive responses). In a quantitative assessment of content knowledge, students who participated in new TS inquiry labs (n = 245) outscored their peers in traditional labs (n = 86) on Medical College Admission Test-style standardized exams (59.3 ± 0.8% vs. 48.9 ± 1.3%, respectively; P < 0.0001). We believe these quantitative data support the qualitative findings and suggest the TS inquiry lab approach increases student learning.

AB - Are traditional laboratories in the core introductory biology courses teaching physiology majors the art and trade of science, or simply leaving them with a memory of trivial experiments done for unknown reasons? Our students, a population dominated by premed and physiology majors, think the latter and have encouraged us to challenge this model, and it turns out scientists and education researchers agree with our students (4, 31, 32). In an effort to remedy this, we began a long-term redesign of the introductory biology sequence to become what is now a sequence of inquiry laboratories we term "Teams and Streams" (TS). In these TS inquiry labs, student research teams pose a scientific question/hypothesis, propose an experimental design, perform multi-week investigations and then present their findings in various forms (web, interviews, and papers). The response to this classroom laboratory design has been overwhelmingly positive. In a qualitative study of student opinion (where 260 student responses were studied), surveys conducted at the end of semesters where traditional scripted labs were used (n = 70 comments) had predominately negative opinions (80% negative responses), whereas the reverse was true for students (n = 190 comments) who participated in courses using the TS inquiry labs (78% positive responses). In a quantitative assessment of content knowledge, students who participated in new TS inquiry labs (n = 245) outscored their peers in traditional labs (n = 86) on Medical College Admission Test-style standardized exams (59.3 ± 0.8% vs. 48.9 ± 1.3%, respectively; P < 0.0001). We believe these quantitative data support the qualitative findings and suggest the TS inquiry lab approach increases student learning.

KW - Cooperative

KW - Laboratory

KW - Research

KW - Undergraduate

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=10344265561&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=10344265561&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1152/advan.00025.2004

DO - 10.1152/advan.00025.2004

M3 - Article

C2 - 15545349

AN - SCOPUS:10344265561

VL - 28

SP - 199

EP - 209

JO - American Journal of Physiology - Advances in Physiology Education

JF - American Journal of Physiology - Advances in Physiology Education

SN - 1043-4046

IS - 4

ER -