Individual attributes versus composite scores of nerve conduction abnormality: Sensitivity, reproducibility, and concordance with impairment

Peter J Dyck, William J Litchy, Jasper R. Daube, C. Michel Harper, P. James B Dyck, Jenny Davies, Peter C. O'Brien

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

55 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Composite scores may be more sensitive and reproducible than single attributes of nerve conduction for detection of peripheral neuropathy, but this requires validation in large patient cohorts. Also, the concordance of individual attributes versus composite scores with clinical measures of severity has not been tested. Here, we study these issues in prospectively studied cohorts: diabetic patients from Rochester, Minnesota (RDNS; n = 396); chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) patients (n = 55); and multifocal motor neuropathy (MMN) patients (n = 18). With specificity fixed at the 97.5 percentile, we found that, in generalized polyneuropathies (diabetic and CIDP), composite scores (especially ones including conduction velocity, distal latencies, and F-waves) of individual or multiple nerves tended to be more sensitive than individual attributes. By contrast, for multiple mononeuropathies, some individual attributes or composite scores of individual nerves were more sensitive than composite scores. In diabetic polyneuropathy, composite scores tended to be more reproducible than individual attributes of nerve conduction. Highly significant correlations were found between individual attributes or composite scores and neurologic impairment in diabetic polyneuropathy and in CIDP; in general, correlation coefficients were higher for composite scores. These correlations were higher for amplitudes than for conduction velocities or distal latencies. We conclude that, with the availability of microprocessors and normative databases, electromyographers may increasingly seek to express nerve conduction abnormality also as composite scores of individual or several nerves.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)202-210
Number of pages9
JournalMuscle and Nerve
Volume27
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2003

Fingerprint

Neural Conduction
Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyradiculoneuropathy
Diabetic Neuropathies
Mononeuropathies
Polyneuropathies
Microcomputers
Peripheral Nervous System Diseases
Nervous System
Databases

Keywords

  • Concordance of nerve tests
  • Nerve conductions
  • Neuropathic abnormality sensitivity
  • Representativeness
  • Reproducibility

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Neurology
  • Neuroscience(all)

Cite this

Individual attributes versus composite scores of nerve conduction abnormality : Sensitivity, reproducibility, and concordance with impairment. / Dyck, Peter J; Litchy, William J; Daube, Jasper R.; Harper, C. Michel; Dyck, P. James B; Davies, Jenny; O'Brien, Peter C.

In: Muscle and Nerve, Vol. 27, No. 2, 01.02.2003, p. 202-210.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{6113eb55ca5c49e9b71e47b65ee184c7,
title = "Individual attributes versus composite scores of nerve conduction abnormality: Sensitivity, reproducibility, and concordance with impairment",
abstract = "Composite scores may be more sensitive and reproducible than single attributes of nerve conduction for detection of peripheral neuropathy, but this requires validation in large patient cohorts. Also, the concordance of individual attributes versus composite scores with clinical measures of severity has not been tested. Here, we study these issues in prospectively studied cohorts: diabetic patients from Rochester, Minnesota (RDNS; n = 396); chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) patients (n = 55); and multifocal motor neuropathy (MMN) patients (n = 18). With specificity fixed at the 97.5 percentile, we found that, in generalized polyneuropathies (diabetic and CIDP), composite scores (especially ones including conduction velocity, distal latencies, and F-waves) of individual or multiple nerves tended to be more sensitive than individual attributes. By contrast, for multiple mononeuropathies, some individual attributes or composite scores of individual nerves were more sensitive than composite scores. In diabetic polyneuropathy, composite scores tended to be more reproducible than individual attributes of nerve conduction. Highly significant correlations were found between individual attributes or composite scores and neurologic impairment in diabetic polyneuropathy and in CIDP; in general, correlation coefficients were higher for composite scores. These correlations were higher for amplitudes than for conduction velocities or distal latencies. We conclude that, with the availability of microprocessors and normative databases, electromyographers may increasingly seek to express nerve conduction abnormality also as composite scores of individual or several nerves.",
keywords = "Concordance of nerve tests, Nerve conductions, Neuropathic abnormality sensitivity, Representativeness, Reproducibility",
author = "Dyck, {Peter J} and Litchy, {William J} and Daube, {Jasper R.} and Harper, {C. Michel} and Dyck, {P. James B} and Jenny Davies and O'Brien, {Peter C.}",
year = "2003",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1002/mus.10320",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "27",
pages = "202--210",
journal = "Muscle and Nerve",
issn = "0148-639X",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Individual attributes versus composite scores of nerve conduction abnormality

T2 - Sensitivity, reproducibility, and concordance with impairment

AU - Dyck, Peter J

AU - Litchy, William J

AU - Daube, Jasper R.

AU - Harper, C. Michel

AU - Dyck, P. James B

AU - Davies, Jenny

AU - O'Brien, Peter C.

PY - 2003/2/1

Y1 - 2003/2/1

N2 - Composite scores may be more sensitive and reproducible than single attributes of nerve conduction for detection of peripheral neuropathy, but this requires validation in large patient cohorts. Also, the concordance of individual attributes versus composite scores with clinical measures of severity has not been tested. Here, we study these issues in prospectively studied cohorts: diabetic patients from Rochester, Minnesota (RDNS; n = 396); chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) patients (n = 55); and multifocal motor neuropathy (MMN) patients (n = 18). With specificity fixed at the 97.5 percentile, we found that, in generalized polyneuropathies (diabetic and CIDP), composite scores (especially ones including conduction velocity, distal latencies, and F-waves) of individual or multiple nerves tended to be more sensitive than individual attributes. By contrast, for multiple mononeuropathies, some individual attributes or composite scores of individual nerves were more sensitive than composite scores. In diabetic polyneuropathy, composite scores tended to be more reproducible than individual attributes of nerve conduction. Highly significant correlations were found between individual attributes or composite scores and neurologic impairment in diabetic polyneuropathy and in CIDP; in general, correlation coefficients were higher for composite scores. These correlations were higher for amplitudes than for conduction velocities or distal latencies. We conclude that, with the availability of microprocessors and normative databases, electromyographers may increasingly seek to express nerve conduction abnormality also as composite scores of individual or several nerves.

AB - Composite scores may be more sensitive and reproducible than single attributes of nerve conduction for detection of peripheral neuropathy, but this requires validation in large patient cohorts. Also, the concordance of individual attributes versus composite scores with clinical measures of severity has not been tested. Here, we study these issues in prospectively studied cohorts: diabetic patients from Rochester, Minnesota (RDNS; n = 396); chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) patients (n = 55); and multifocal motor neuropathy (MMN) patients (n = 18). With specificity fixed at the 97.5 percentile, we found that, in generalized polyneuropathies (diabetic and CIDP), composite scores (especially ones including conduction velocity, distal latencies, and F-waves) of individual or multiple nerves tended to be more sensitive than individual attributes. By contrast, for multiple mononeuropathies, some individual attributes or composite scores of individual nerves were more sensitive than composite scores. In diabetic polyneuropathy, composite scores tended to be more reproducible than individual attributes of nerve conduction. Highly significant correlations were found between individual attributes or composite scores and neurologic impairment in diabetic polyneuropathy and in CIDP; in general, correlation coefficients were higher for composite scores. These correlations were higher for amplitudes than for conduction velocities or distal latencies. We conclude that, with the availability of microprocessors and normative databases, electromyographers may increasingly seek to express nerve conduction abnormality also as composite scores of individual or several nerves.

KW - Concordance of nerve tests

KW - Nerve conductions

KW - Neuropathic abnormality sensitivity

KW - Representativeness

KW - Reproducibility

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0037311359&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0037311359&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/mus.10320

DO - 10.1002/mus.10320

M3 - Article

C2 - 12548528

AN - SCOPUS:0037311359

VL - 27

SP - 202

EP - 210

JO - Muscle and Nerve

JF - Muscle and Nerve

SN - 0148-639X

IS - 2

ER -