Increased anatomic severity predicts outcomes: Validation of the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma's Emergency General Surgery score in appendicitis

Matthew C. Hernandez, Johnathon M. Aho, Elizabeth B. Habermann, Asad J. Choudhry, David S. Morris, Martin D. Zielinski

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

32 Scopus citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Determination and reporting of disease severity in emergency general surgery lacks standardization. Recently, the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma (AAST) proposed an anatomic severity grading system. We aimed to validate this system in patients with appendicitis and determine if cross-sectional imaging correlates with disease severity at operation. METHODS: Patients 18 years or older undergoing treatment for acute appendicitis between 2013 and 2015 were identified. Baseline demographics, procedure types were recorded, and AAST grades were assigned based on intraoperative and radiologic findings. Outcomes including length of stay, 30-day mortality, and complications based on Clavien-Dindo categories and National Surgical Quality Improvement Programvariables. Summary statistical univariate, nominal logistic, and standard least squares analyseswere performed comparing AAST grade with key outcomes. Bland-Altman analysis compared operative findings with preoperative cross-sectional imaging to compare assigning grades. RESULTS: Three hundred thirty-four patients with mean (±SD) age of 39.3 years (±16.5) were included (53% men), and all patients had crosssectional imaging. Two hundred ninety-nine underwent appendectomy, and 85% completed laparoscopic. Thirty-day mortality rate was 0.9%, complication rate was 21%. Increased (median [interquartile range, IQR]) AAST grade was recorded in patients with complications (2 [1-4]) compared with thosewithout (1 [1-1], p = 0.001). For operativemanagement, (median [IQR]) AAST grades were significantly associated with procedure type: laparoscopic (1 [1-1]), open (4 [2-5]), conversion to open (3 [1-4], p = 0.001). Increased (median [IQR]) AAST grades were significantly associated in nonoperative management: patients having a complication had a higher median AAST grade (4 [3-5]) compared with those without (3 [2-3], p = 0.001). Bland-Altman analysis comparing AAST grade and cross-sectional imaging demonstrated no difference (-0.02 ± 0.02; p = 0.2; coefficient of repeatability 0.9). CONCLUSIONS: The AAST grading system is valid in our population. Increased AAST grade is associated with open procedures, complications, and length of stay. The AAST emergency general surgery grade determined by preoperative imaging strongly correlated to operative findings. (J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2017;82: 73-79.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)73-78
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery
Volume82
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2017

Keywords

  • Emergency general surgery
  • Patient outcomes
  • Quality of care
  • Scoring grading
  • Staging

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Increased anatomic severity predicts outcomes: Validation of the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma's Emergency General Surgery score in appendicitis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this