In vivo efficacy of tesevatinib in EGFR-amplified patient-derived xenograft glioblastoma models may be limited by tissue binding and compensatory signaling

Sani H. Kizilbash, Shiv K. Gupta, Karen E. Parrish, Janice K. Laramy, Minjee Kim, Gautham Gampa, Brett L. Carlson, Katrina K. Bakken, Ann C. Mladek, Mark A. Schroeder, Paul A. Decker, William F. Elmquist, Jann N. Sarkaria

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Tesevatinib is a potent oral brain penetrant EGFR inhibitor currently being evaluated for glioblastoma therapy. Tesevatinib distribution was assessed in wild-type (WT) and Mdr1a/b(-/-)Bcrp(-/-) triple knockout (TKO) FVB mice after dosing orally or via osmotic minipump; drug-tissue binding was assessed by rapid equilibrium dialysis. Two hours after tesevatinib dosing, brain concentrations in WT and TKO mice were 0.72 and 10.03 mg/g, respectively. Brain-to-plasma ratios (Kp) were 0.53 and 5.73, respectively. With intraperitoneal infusion, brain concentrations were 1.46 and 30.6 mg/g (Kp 1.16 and 25.10), respectively. The brain-to-plasma unbound drug concentration ratios were substantially lower (WT mice, 0.03-0.08; TKO mice, 0.40-1.75). Unbound drug concentrations in brains of WT mice were 0.78 to 1.59 ng/g. In vitro cytotoxicity and EGFR pathway signaling were evaluated using EGFR-amplified patient-derived glioblastoma xenograft models (GBM12, GBM6). In vivo pharmacodynamics and efficacy were assessed using athymic nude mice bearing either intracranial or flank tumors treated by oral gavage. Tesevatinib potently reduced cell viability [IC50 GBM12 ¼ 11 nmol/L (5.5 ng/mL), GBM6 ¼ 102 nmol/L] and suppressed EGFR signaling in vitro. However, tesevatinib efficacy compared with vehicle in intracranial (GBM12, median survival: 23 vs. 18 days, P ¼ 0.003) and flank models (GBM12, median time to outcome: 41 vs. 33 days, P ¼ 0.007; GBM6, 44 vs. 33 days, P ¼ 0.007) was modest and associated with partial inhibition of EGFR signaling. Overall, tesevatinib efficacy in EGFR-amplified PDX GBM models is robust in vitro but relatively modest in vivo, despite a high brain-to-plasma ratio. This discrepancy may be explained by drug-tissue binding and compensatory signaling.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1009-1018
Number of pages10
JournalMolecular cancer therapeutics
Volume20
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2021

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oncology
  • Cancer Research

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'In vivo efficacy of tesevatinib in EGFR-amplified patient-derived xenograft glioblastoma models may be limited by tissue binding and compensatory signaling'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this