In defense of body CT

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

115 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

OBJECTIVE. Rapid technical developments and an expanding list of applications that have supplanted less accurate or more invasive diagnostic tests have led to a dramatic increase in the use of body CT in medical practice since its introduction in 1975. Our purpose here is to discuss medical justification of the small potential risk associated with the ionizing radiation used in CT and to provide perspectives on practice-specific decisions that can maximize overall patient benefit. In addition, we review available dose management and optimization techniques. CONCLUSION. Dose reduction strategies described in this article must be well understood and properly used, but also require broad-based practice strategies that extend beyond the CT scanner console and default, generic manufacturer settings. In the final analysis, physicians must request the imaging examination that best addresses the specific medical question without allowing worries about radiation to dissuade them or their patients from obtaining needed CT examinations. Ongoing efforts to ensure that CT examinations are both medically justified and optimally performed must continue, and education must be provided to the medical community and general public that put both the potential risks - and benefits - of CT examinations into proper perspective.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)28-39
Number of pages12
JournalAmerican Journal of Roentgenology
Volume193
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2009

Fingerprint

Ionizing Radiation
Routine Diagnostic Tests
Radiation
Physicians
Education

Keywords

  • ACR appropriateness criteria
  • Body CT
  • Cancer
  • CT
  • Gastrointestinal imaging
  • Oncologic imaging
  • Radiation dose
  • Radiation risk

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

In defense of body CT. / McCollough, Cynthia H; Guimarães, Luís; Fletcher, Joel Garland.

In: American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol. 193, No. 1, 07.2009, p. 28-39.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{067ff3a8de20406789a4474e6026d36c,
title = "In defense of body CT",
abstract = "OBJECTIVE. Rapid technical developments and an expanding list of applications that have supplanted less accurate or more invasive diagnostic tests have led to a dramatic increase in the use of body CT in medical practice since its introduction in 1975. Our purpose here is to discuss medical justification of the small potential risk associated with the ionizing radiation used in CT and to provide perspectives on practice-specific decisions that can maximize overall patient benefit. In addition, we review available dose management and optimization techniques. CONCLUSION. Dose reduction strategies described in this article must be well understood and properly used, but also require broad-based practice strategies that extend beyond the CT scanner console and default, generic manufacturer settings. In the final analysis, physicians must request the imaging examination that best addresses the specific medical question without allowing worries about radiation to dissuade them or their patients from obtaining needed CT examinations. Ongoing efforts to ensure that CT examinations are both medically justified and optimally performed must continue, and education must be provided to the medical community and general public that put both the potential risks - and benefits - of CT examinations into proper perspective.",
keywords = "ACR appropriateness criteria, Body CT, Cancer, CT, Gastrointestinal imaging, Oncologic imaging, Radiation dose, Radiation risk",
author = "McCollough, {Cynthia H} and Lu{\'i}s Guimar{\~a}es and Fletcher, {Joel Garland}",
year = "2009",
month = "7",
doi = "10.2214/AJR.09.2754",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "193",
pages = "28--39",
journal = "American Journal of Roentgenology",
issn = "0361-803X",
publisher = "American Roentgen Ray Society",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - In defense of body CT

AU - McCollough, Cynthia H

AU - Guimarães, Luís

AU - Fletcher, Joel Garland

PY - 2009/7

Y1 - 2009/7

N2 - OBJECTIVE. Rapid technical developments and an expanding list of applications that have supplanted less accurate or more invasive diagnostic tests have led to a dramatic increase in the use of body CT in medical practice since its introduction in 1975. Our purpose here is to discuss medical justification of the small potential risk associated with the ionizing radiation used in CT and to provide perspectives on practice-specific decisions that can maximize overall patient benefit. In addition, we review available dose management and optimization techniques. CONCLUSION. Dose reduction strategies described in this article must be well understood and properly used, but also require broad-based practice strategies that extend beyond the CT scanner console and default, generic manufacturer settings. In the final analysis, physicians must request the imaging examination that best addresses the specific medical question without allowing worries about radiation to dissuade them or their patients from obtaining needed CT examinations. Ongoing efforts to ensure that CT examinations are both medically justified and optimally performed must continue, and education must be provided to the medical community and general public that put both the potential risks - and benefits - of CT examinations into proper perspective.

AB - OBJECTIVE. Rapid technical developments and an expanding list of applications that have supplanted less accurate or more invasive diagnostic tests have led to a dramatic increase in the use of body CT in medical practice since its introduction in 1975. Our purpose here is to discuss medical justification of the small potential risk associated with the ionizing radiation used in CT and to provide perspectives on practice-specific decisions that can maximize overall patient benefit. In addition, we review available dose management and optimization techniques. CONCLUSION. Dose reduction strategies described in this article must be well understood and properly used, but also require broad-based practice strategies that extend beyond the CT scanner console and default, generic manufacturer settings. In the final analysis, physicians must request the imaging examination that best addresses the specific medical question without allowing worries about radiation to dissuade them or their patients from obtaining needed CT examinations. Ongoing efforts to ensure that CT examinations are both medically justified and optimally performed must continue, and education must be provided to the medical community and general public that put both the potential risks - and benefits - of CT examinations into proper perspective.

KW - ACR appropriateness criteria

KW - Body CT

KW - Cancer

KW - CT

KW - Gastrointestinal imaging

KW - Oncologic imaging

KW - Radiation dose

KW - Radiation risk

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=67650334121&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=67650334121&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2214/AJR.09.2754

DO - 10.2214/AJR.09.2754

M3 - Article

VL - 193

SP - 28

EP - 39

JO - American Journal of Roentgenology

JF - American Journal of Roentgenology

SN - 0361-803X

IS - 1

ER -