Improving the interpretation of quality of life evidence in meta-analyses

the application of minimal important difference units

Bradley C. Johnston, Kristian Thorlund, Holger J. Schünemann, Feng Xie, Mohammad H Murad, Victor Manuel Montori, Gordon H. Guyatt

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

64 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Systematic reviews of randomized trials that include measurements of health-related quality of life potentially provide critical information for patient and clinicians facing challenging health care decisions. When, as is most often the case, individual randomized trials use different measurement instruments for the same construct (such as physical or emotional function), authors typically report differences between intervention and control in standard deviation units (so-called "standardized mean difference" or "effect size"). This approach has statistical limitations (it is influenced by the heterogeneity of the population) and is non-intuitive for decision makers. We suggest an alternative approach: reporting results in minimal important difference units (the smallest difference patients experience as important). This approach provides a potential solution to both the statistical and interpretational problems of existing methods.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number116
JournalHealth and Quality of Life Outcomes
Volume8
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 11 2010

Fingerprint

Meta-Analysis
Quality of Life
Population Characteristics
Delivery of Health Care

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Improving the interpretation of quality of life evidence in meta-analyses : the application of minimal important difference units. / Johnston, Bradley C.; Thorlund, Kristian; Schünemann, Holger J.; Xie, Feng; Murad, Mohammad H; Montori, Victor Manuel; Guyatt, Gordon H.

In: Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, Vol. 8, 116, 11.10.2010.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{27400cd796854f4b81b85afeb3bd4f9a,
title = "Improving the interpretation of quality of life evidence in meta-analyses: the application of minimal important difference units",
abstract = "Systematic reviews of randomized trials that include measurements of health-related quality of life potentially provide critical information for patient and clinicians facing challenging health care decisions. When, as is most often the case, individual randomized trials use different measurement instruments for the same construct (such as physical or emotional function), authors typically report differences between intervention and control in standard deviation units (so-called {"}standardized mean difference{"} or {"}effect size{"}). This approach has statistical limitations (it is influenced by the heterogeneity of the population) and is non-intuitive for decision makers. We suggest an alternative approach: reporting results in minimal important difference units (the smallest difference patients experience as important). This approach provides a potential solution to both the statistical and interpretational problems of existing methods.",
author = "Johnston, {Bradley C.} and Kristian Thorlund and Sch{\"u}nemann, {Holger J.} and Feng Xie and Murad, {Mohammad H} and Montori, {Victor Manuel} and Guyatt, {Gordon H.}",
year = "2010",
month = "10",
day = "11",
doi = "10.1186/1477-7525-8-116",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "8",
journal = "Health and Quality of Life Outcomes",
issn = "1477-7525",
publisher = "BioMed Central",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Improving the interpretation of quality of life evidence in meta-analyses

T2 - the application of minimal important difference units

AU - Johnston, Bradley C.

AU - Thorlund, Kristian

AU - Schünemann, Holger J.

AU - Xie, Feng

AU - Murad, Mohammad H

AU - Montori, Victor Manuel

AU - Guyatt, Gordon H.

PY - 2010/10/11

Y1 - 2010/10/11

N2 - Systematic reviews of randomized trials that include measurements of health-related quality of life potentially provide critical information for patient and clinicians facing challenging health care decisions. When, as is most often the case, individual randomized trials use different measurement instruments for the same construct (such as physical or emotional function), authors typically report differences between intervention and control in standard deviation units (so-called "standardized mean difference" or "effect size"). This approach has statistical limitations (it is influenced by the heterogeneity of the population) and is non-intuitive for decision makers. We suggest an alternative approach: reporting results in minimal important difference units (the smallest difference patients experience as important). This approach provides a potential solution to both the statistical and interpretational problems of existing methods.

AB - Systematic reviews of randomized trials that include measurements of health-related quality of life potentially provide critical information for patient and clinicians facing challenging health care decisions. When, as is most often the case, individual randomized trials use different measurement instruments for the same construct (such as physical or emotional function), authors typically report differences between intervention and control in standard deviation units (so-called "standardized mean difference" or "effect size"). This approach has statistical limitations (it is influenced by the heterogeneity of the population) and is non-intuitive for decision makers. We suggest an alternative approach: reporting results in minimal important difference units (the smallest difference patients experience as important). This approach provides a potential solution to both the statistical and interpretational problems of existing methods.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77957660942&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77957660942&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1186/1477-7525-8-116

DO - 10.1186/1477-7525-8-116

M3 - Article

VL - 8

JO - Health and Quality of Life Outcomes

JF - Health and Quality of Life Outcomes

SN - 1477-7525

M1 - 116

ER -