Improving referring physicians' understanding of electromyography reports when qualifying radiculopathies: A need for standardized terminology

Elizabeth A. Mauricio, Elliot L. Dimberg, Kathleen Kennelly, Devon I. Rubin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Electromyographic (EMG) reporting of radiculopathies is not standardized, and the terminology used in reports can be misinterpreted by referring physicians. Physicians who refer patients for EMG studies at the Mayo Clinic were surveyed about their understanding of 6 different EMG interpretations of an S1 radiculopathy. Of 45 responders, the terms "acute, active," "chronic, inactive," and "old" were interpreted consistently by 95%, 98%, and 84% of responders, respectively. Physicians had the most difficulty understanding the meaning of "chronic" in isolation, "chronic, active," or "old with uncompensated denervation." These findings suggest a need to educate referring physicians on the meaning of the terms used in EMG reports and to develop standard guidelines for qualifying radiculopathies. Based on our observations, guidelines for the reporting of radiculopathies have been adopted in the Mayo Clinic Florida EMG laboratory.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)129-130
Number of pages2
JournalMuscle and Nerve
Volume49
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2014

Fingerprint

Radiculopathy
Electromyography
Terminology
Physicians
Guidelines
Denervation

Keywords

  • Active
  • Chronic
  • EMG reports
  • Radiculopathy
  • Standardization
  • Terminology

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Neurology
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience
  • Physiology (medical)
  • Physiology

Cite this

Improving referring physicians' understanding of electromyography reports when qualifying radiculopathies : A need for standardized terminology. / Mauricio, Elizabeth A.; Dimberg, Elliot L.; Kennelly, Kathleen; Rubin, Devon I.

In: Muscle and Nerve, Vol. 49, No. 1, 01.2014, p. 129-130.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{89d88f15940548d7b58da09eb3a544e1,
title = "Improving referring physicians' understanding of electromyography reports when qualifying radiculopathies: A need for standardized terminology",
abstract = "Electromyographic (EMG) reporting of radiculopathies is not standardized, and the terminology used in reports can be misinterpreted by referring physicians. Physicians who refer patients for EMG studies at the Mayo Clinic were surveyed about their understanding of 6 different EMG interpretations of an S1 radiculopathy. Of 45 responders, the terms {"}acute, active,{"} {"}chronic, inactive,{"} and {"}old{"} were interpreted consistently by 95{\%}, 98{\%}, and 84{\%} of responders, respectively. Physicians had the most difficulty understanding the meaning of {"}chronic{"} in isolation, {"}chronic, active,{"} or {"}old with uncompensated denervation.{"} These findings suggest a need to educate referring physicians on the meaning of the terms used in EMG reports and to develop standard guidelines for qualifying radiculopathies. Based on our observations, guidelines for the reporting of radiculopathies have been adopted in the Mayo Clinic Florida EMG laboratory.",
keywords = "Active, Chronic, EMG reports, Radiculopathy, Standardization, Terminology",
author = "Mauricio, {Elizabeth A.} and Dimberg, {Elliot L.} and Kathleen Kennelly and Rubin, {Devon I.}",
year = "2014",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1002/mus.24094",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "49",
pages = "129--130",
journal = "Muscle and Nerve",
issn = "0148-639X",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Improving referring physicians' understanding of electromyography reports when qualifying radiculopathies

T2 - A need for standardized terminology

AU - Mauricio, Elizabeth A.

AU - Dimberg, Elliot L.

AU - Kennelly, Kathleen

AU - Rubin, Devon I.

PY - 2014/1

Y1 - 2014/1

N2 - Electromyographic (EMG) reporting of radiculopathies is not standardized, and the terminology used in reports can be misinterpreted by referring physicians. Physicians who refer patients for EMG studies at the Mayo Clinic were surveyed about their understanding of 6 different EMG interpretations of an S1 radiculopathy. Of 45 responders, the terms "acute, active," "chronic, inactive," and "old" were interpreted consistently by 95%, 98%, and 84% of responders, respectively. Physicians had the most difficulty understanding the meaning of "chronic" in isolation, "chronic, active," or "old with uncompensated denervation." These findings suggest a need to educate referring physicians on the meaning of the terms used in EMG reports and to develop standard guidelines for qualifying radiculopathies. Based on our observations, guidelines for the reporting of radiculopathies have been adopted in the Mayo Clinic Florida EMG laboratory.

AB - Electromyographic (EMG) reporting of radiculopathies is not standardized, and the terminology used in reports can be misinterpreted by referring physicians. Physicians who refer patients for EMG studies at the Mayo Clinic were surveyed about their understanding of 6 different EMG interpretations of an S1 radiculopathy. Of 45 responders, the terms "acute, active," "chronic, inactive," and "old" were interpreted consistently by 95%, 98%, and 84% of responders, respectively. Physicians had the most difficulty understanding the meaning of "chronic" in isolation, "chronic, active," or "old with uncompensated denervation." These findings suggest a need to educate referring physicians on the meaning of the terms used in EMG reports and to develop standard guidelines for qualifying radiculopathies. Based on our observations, guidelines for the reporting of radiculopathies have been adopted in the Mayo Clinic Florida EMG laboratory.

KW - Active

KW - Chronic

KW - EMG reports

KW - Radiculopathy

KW - Standardization

KW - Terminology

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84890433274&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84890433274&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/mus.24094

DO - 10.1002/mus.24094

M3 - Article

C2 - 24122745

AN - SCOPUS:84890433274

VL - 49

SP - 129

EP - 130

JO - Muscle and Nerve

JF - Muscle and Nerve

SN - 0148-639X

IS - 1

ER -