Improving recognition of adolescent depression in primary care

Rachel A. Zuckerbrot, Peter S. Jensen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

79 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: To address the following questions: (1) What evidence (ie, psychometric data collected in pediatric primary care, patient outcome data) exists for the various methods used to identify adolescent depression in primary care? and (2) What identification practices are currently in use? Data Sources: We systematically searched MEDLINE for English-language articles using specific search terms and examined relevant titles, abstracts, and articles. Study Selection: We reviewed 1743 MEDLINE abstracts. Seventy-four articles were pulled for examination, with 30 articles meeting full criteria. Data Extraction: Five studies had adequate psychometric data on various adolescent depression identification methods in primary care. Only 1 compared the diagnostic accuracy of physicians trained to ask depression questions vs physicians trained in the use of a diagnostic aid. Six studies reported on current practice. Evidence regarding sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value was sought for question 1. Frequency of screening was sought for question 2. Data Synthesis: Review of these articles found that few health care professionals use systematic depression identification methods, despite some growing evidence for their validity, feasibility, and possible efficacy. Conclusion: Available evidence indicates that primary care professionals would improve their rates of depression diagnosis through training, but even more so by using adolescent symptom rating scales.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)694-704
Number of pages11
JournalArchives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine
Volume160
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - 2006
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Primary Health Care
Depression
Psychometrics
MEDLINE
Physicians
Information Storage and Retrieval
Language
Pediatrics
Delivery of Health Care
Sensitivity and Specificity

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health

Cite this

Improving recognition of adolescent depression in primary care. / Zuckerbrot, Rachel A.; Jensen, Peter S.

In: Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Vol. 160, No. 7, 2006, p. 694-704.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Zuckerbrot, Rachel A. ; Jensen, Peter S. / Improving recognition of adolescent depression in primary care. In: Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine. 2006 ; Vol. 160, No. 7. pp. 694-704.
@article{2b69fbfe1be44b0f94bfc84b9d9eed0a,
title = "Improving recognition of adolescent depression in primary care",
abstract = "Objective: To address the following questions: (1) What evidence (ie, psychometric data collected in pediatric primary care, patient outcome data) exists for the various methods used to identify adolescent depression in primary care? and (2) What identification practices are currently in use? Data Sources: We systematically searched MEDLINE for English-language articles using specific search terms and examined relevant titles, abstracts, and articles. Study Selection: We reviewed 1743 MEDLINE abstracts. Seventy-four articles were pulled for examination, with 30 articles meeting full criteria. Data Extraction: Five studies had adequate psychometric data on various adolescent depression identification methods in primary care. Only 1 compared the diagnostic accuracy of physicians trained to ask depression questions vs physicians trained in the use of a diagnostic aid. Six studies reported on current practice. Evidence regarding sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value was sought for question 1. Frequency of screening was sought for question 2. Data Synthesis: Review of these articles found that few health care professionals use systematic depression identification methods, despite some growing evidence for their validity, feasibility, and possible efficacy. Conclusion: Available evidence indicates that primary care professionals would improve their rates of depression diagnosis through training, but even more so by using adolescent symptom rating scales.",
author = "Zuckerbrot, {Rachel A.} and Jensen, {Peter S.}",
year = "2006",
doi = "10.1001/archpedi.160.7.694",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "160",
pages = "694--704",
journal = "JAMA Pediatrics",
issn = "2168-6203",
publisher = "American Medical Association",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Improving recognition of adolescent depression in primary care

AU - Zuckerbrot, Rachel A.

AU - Jensen, Peter S.

PY - 2006

Y1 - 2006

N2 - Objective: To address the following questions: (1) What evidence (ie, psychometric data collected in pediatric primary care, patient outcome data) exists for the various methods used to identify adolescent depression in primary care? and (2) What identification practices are currently in use? Data Sources: We systematically searched MEDLINE for English-language articles using specific search terms and examined relevant titles, abstracts, and articles. Study Selection: We reviewed 1743 MEDLINE abstracts. Seventy-four articles were pulled for examination, with 30 articles meeting full criteria. Data Extraction: Five studies had adequate psychometric data on various adolescent depression identification methods in primary care. Only 1 compared the diagnostic accuracy of physicians trained to ask depression questions vs physicians trained in the use of a diagnostic aid. Six studies reported on current practice. Evidence regarding sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value was sought for question 1. Frequency of screening was sought for question 2. Data Synthesis: Review of these articles found that few health care professionals use systematic depression identification methods, despite some growing evidence for their validity, feasibility, and possible efficacy. Conclusion: Available evidence indicates that primary care professionals would improve their rates of depression diagnosis through training, but even more so by using adolescent symptom rating scales.

AB - Objective: To address the following questions: (1) What evidence (ie, psychometric data collected in pediatric primary care, patient outcome data) exists for the various methods used to identify adolescent depression in primary care? and (2) What identification practices are currently in use? Data Sources: We systematically searched MEDLINE for English-language articles using specific search terms and examined relevant titles, abstracts, and articles. Study Selection: We reviewed 1743 MEDLINE abstracts. Seventy-four articles were pulled for examination, with 30 articles meeting full criteria. Data Extraction: Five studies had adequate psychometric data on various adolescent depression identification methods in primary care. Only 1 compared the diagnostic accuracy of physicians trained to ask depression questions vs physicians trained in the use of a diagnostic aid. Six studies reported on current practice. Evidence regarding sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value was sought for question 1. Frequency of screening was sought for question 2. Data Synthesis: Review of these articles found that few health care professionals use systematic depression identification methods, despite some growing evidence for their validity, feasibility, and possible efficacy. Conclusion: Available evidence indicates that primary care professionals would improve their rates of depression diagnosis through training, but even more so by using adolescent symptom rating scales.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33745685810&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33745685810&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1001/archpedi.160.7.694

DO - 10.1001/archpedi.160.7.694

M3 - Article

C2 - 16818834

AN - SCOPUS:33745685810

VL - 160

SP - 694

EP - 704

JO - JAMA Pediatrics

JF - JAMA Pediatrics

SN - 2168-6203

IS - 7

ER -