Improving maintenance of lost weight following a commercial liquid meal replacement program: A preliminary study

Gretchen E. Ames, Roshni H. Patel, Jillian S. McMullen, Colleen S. Thomas, Juliana Crook, Scott A. Lynch, Lesley D. Lutes

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Clinic-based liquid meal replacement (800kcals/day) programs produce substantial weight loss. Nevertheless, long-term maintenance remains a challenge. A limitation of maintenance programs is that they continue to promote large behavior changes that are initially required to induce weight loss which may be unsustainable long-term. The study aims were to conduct a preliminary assessment of the feasibility, acceptability, and effectiveness of a small changes maintenance intervention (SCM) for 30 patients who completed liquid meal replacement program (LMR). The 20-session SCM delivered over 52weeks offered no preset goals for maintenance behaviors and all changes in behavior were self-selected. Participants had a median BMI of 40.9kg/m2 and weight of 111kg at the start of LMR. At LMR completion, they lost 18% (21kg) of body weight. The SCM was completed by 22 patients (73%); 19 completers (86%) attended≥17 of 20 sessions with a median satisfaction rating of 9 (on a scale of 1 to 9). Completers were asked to record self-selected maintenance behaviors daily (median 351days recorded). The most commonly reported daily behaviors were self-weighing, use of meal replacements and step counting. Median percent regain at week 52 was 14% (2.8kg) of lost weight (range, -42 to 74%), significantly less than a median of 56% (11kg) percent regain of lost weight (range, -78 to 110%) in a demographically similar historical control group with no maintenance intervention after LMR completion (P<0.001). Thus, SCM holds promise for improving weight maintenance. Future research should compare SCM to standard maintenance programs that promote large program-directed changes.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)95-98
Number of pages4
JournalEating Behaviors
Volume15
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2014

Fingerprint

Meals
Maintenance
Weights and Measures
Weight Loss
Body Weight
Control Groups

Keywords

  • Obesity
  • Small Changes Maintenance
  • Weight loss

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychiatry and Mental health
  • Clinical Psychology

Cite this

Improving maintenance of lost weight following a commercial liquid meal replacement program : A preliminary study. / Ames, Gretchen E.; Patel, Roshni H.; McMullen, Jillian S.; Thomas, Colleen S.; Crook, Juliana; Lynch, Scott A.; Lutes, Lesley D.

In: Eating Behaviors, Vol. 15, No. 1, 01.2014, p. 95-98.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Ames, Gretchen E. ; Patel, Roshni H. ; McMullen, Jillian S. ; Thomas, Colleen S. ; Crook, Juliana ; Lynch, Scott A. ; Lutes, Lesley D. / Improving maintenance of lost weight following a commercial liquid meal replacement program : A preliminary study. In: Eating Behaviors. 2014 ; Vol. 15, No. 1. pp. 95-98.
@article{962ba555e03e43daa123aef164671493,
title = "Improving maintenance of lost weight following a commercial liquid meal replacement program: A preliminary study",
abstract = "Clinic-based liquid meal replacement (800kcals/day) programs produce substantial weight loss. Nevertheless, long-term maintenance remains a challenge. A limitation of maintenance programs is that they continue to promote large behavior changes that are initially required to induce weight loss which may be unsustainable long-term. The study aims were to conduct a preliminary assessment of the feasibility, acceptability, and effectiveness of a small changes maintenance intervention (SCM) for 30 patients who completed liquid meal replacement program (LMR). The 20-session SCM delivered over 52weeks offered no preset goals for maintenance behaviors and all changes in behavior were self-selected. Participants had a median BMI of 40.9kg/m2 and weight of 111kg at the start of LMR. At LMR completion, they lost 18{\%} (21kg) of body weight. The SCM was completed by 22 patients (73{\%}); 19 completers (86{\%}) attended≥17 of 20 sessions with a median satisfaction rating of 9 (on a scale of 1 to 9). Completers were asked to record self-selected maintenance behaviors daily (median 351days recorded). The most commonly reported daily behaviors were self-weighing, use of meal replacements and step counting. Median percent regain at week 52 was 14{\%} (2.8kg) of lost weight (range, -42 to 74{\%}), significantly less than a median of 56{\%} (11kg) percent regain of lost weight (range, -78 to 110{\%}) in a demographically similar historical control group with no maintenance intervention after LMR completion (P<0.001). Thus, SCM holds promise for improving weight maintenance. Future research should compare SCM to standard maintenance programs that promote large program-directed changes.",
keywords = "Obesity, Small Changes Maintenance, Weight loss",
author = "Ames, {Gretchen E.} and Patel, {Roshni H.} and McMullen, {Jillian S.} and Thomas, {Colleen S.} and Juliana Crook and Lynch, {Scott A.} and Lutes, {Lesley D.}",
year = "2014",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.eatbeh.2013.10.022",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "15",
pages = "95--98",
journal = "Eating Behaviors",
issn = "1471-0153",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Improving maintenance of lost weight following a commercial liquid meal replacement program

T2 - A preliminary study

AU - Ames, Gretchen E.

AU - Patel, Roshni H.

AU - McMullen, Jillian S.

AU - Thomas, Colleen S.

AU - Crook, Juliana

AU - Lynch, Scott A.

AU - Lutes, Lesley D.

PY - 2014/1

Y1 - 2014/1

N2 - Clinic-based liquid meal replacement (800kcals/day) programs produce substantial weight loss. Nevertheless, long-term maintenance remains a challenge. A limitation of maintenance programs is that they continue to promote large behavior changes that are initially required to induce weight loss which may be unsustainable long-term. The study aims were to conduct a preliminary assessment of the feasibility, acceptability, and effectiveness of a small changes maintenance intervention (SCM) for 30 patients who completed liquid meal replacement program (LMR). The 20-session SCM delivered over 52weeks offered no preset goals for maintenance behaviors and all changes in behavior were self-selected. Participants had a median BMI of 40.9kg/m2 and weight of 111kg at the start of LMR. At LMR completion, they lost 18% (21kg) of body weight. The SCM was completed by 22 patients (73%); 19 completers (86%) attended≥17 of 20 sessions with a median satisfaction rating of 9 (on a scale of 1 to 9). Completers were asked to record self-selected maintenance behaviors daily (median 351days recorded). The most commonly reported daily behaviors were self-weighing, use of meal replacements and step counting. Median percent regain at week 52 was 14% (2.8kg) of lost weight (range, -42 to 74%), significantly less than a median of 56% (11kg) percent regain of lost weight (range, -78 to 110%) in a demographically similar historical control group with no maintenance intervention after LMR completion (P<0.001). Thus, SCM holds promise for improving weight maintenance. Future research should compare SCM to standard maintenance programs that promote large program-directed changes.

AB - Clinic-based liquid meal replacement (800kcals/day) programs produce substantial weight loss. Nevertheless, long-term maintenance remains a challenge. A limitation of maintenance programs is that they continue to promote large behavior changes that are initially required to induce weight loss which may be unsustainable long-term. The study aims were to conduct a preliminary assessment of the feasibility, acceptability, and effectiveness of a small changes maintenance intervention (SCM) for 30 patients who completed liquid meal replacement program (LMR). The 20-session SCM delivered over 52weeks offered no preset goals for maintenance behaviors and all changes in behavior were self-selected. Participants had a median BMI of 40.9kg/m2 and weight of 111kg at the start of LMR. At LMR completion, they lost 18% (21kg) of body weight. The SCM was completed by 22 patients (73%); 19 completers (86%) attended≥17 of 20 sessions with a median satisfaction rating of 9 (on a scale of 1 to 9). Completers were asked to record self-selected maintenance behaviors daily (median 351days recorded). The most commonly reported daily behaviors were self-weighing, use of meal replacements and step counting. Median percent regain at week 52 was 14% (2.8kg) of lost weight (range, -42 to 74%), significantly less than a median of 56% (11kg) percent regain of lost weight (range, -78 to 110%) in a demographically similar historical control group with no maintenance intervention after LMR completion (P<0.001). Thus, SCM holds promise for improving weight maintenance. Future research should compare SCM to standard maintenance programs that promote large program-directed changes.

KW - Obesity

KW - Small Changes Maintenance

KW - Weight loss

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84887635943&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84887635943&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.eatbeh.2013.10.022

DO - 10.1016/j.eatbeh.2013.10.022

M3 - Article

C2 - 24411759

AN - SCOPUS:84887635943

VL - 15

SP - 95

EP - 98

JO - Eating Behaviors

JF - Eating Behaviors

SN - 1471-0153

IS - 1

ER -