Improving ERCP quality and decreasing risk to patients and providers

Toufic A. Kachaamy, Douglas Orrick Faigel

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) continues to be one of the most complex gastrointestinal procedures and carries the highest risk of complications. Optimizing the outcome of ERCP requires a fine balance between the risk and the benefit of every maneuver performed. This fine balance has to include an analysis of the indication for the procedure, the optimal timing, the setting where the procedure is performed, the endoscopist and staff training and expertise, availability of surgical and interventional radiology support, the risk of every maneuver and ways to minimize this risk. As in any other procedure, it is very important to know one's limitations and have a plan for failed procedures including consulting a colleague or referring the patient to a center with more expertise. In addition, a process of quality improvement is integral to every endoscopy center to address areas of underperformance, improve patient care and decrease liability.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)531-540
Number of pages10
JournalExpert Review of Gastroenterology and Hepatology
Volume7
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 2013

Fingerprint

Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography
Interventional Radiology
Quality Improvement
Endoscopy
Patient Care

Keywords

  • endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography
  • endoscopic sphincterotomy
  • hemorrhage
  • indomethacin
  • infection
  • intestinal perforation
  • pancreatitis
  • radiation
  • sedation
  • Stent

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Hepatology
  • Gastroenterology

Cite this

Improving ERCP quality and decreasing risk to patients and providers. / Kachaamy, Toufic A.; Faigel, Douglas Orrick.

In: Expert Review of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Vol. 7, No. 6, 08.2013, p. 531-540.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{0acf50c1143c4da5bdaee9f987497a4b,
title = "Improving ERCP quality and decreasing risk to patients and providers",
abstract = "Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) continues to be one of the most complex gastrointestinal procedures and carries the highest risk of complications. Optimizing the outcome of ERCP requires a fine balance between the risk and the benefit of every maneuver performed. This fine balance has to include an analysis of the indication for the procedure, the optimal timing, the setting where the procedure is performed, the endoscopist and staff training and expertise, availability of surgical and interventional radiology support, the risk of every maneuver and ways to minimize this risk. As in any other procedure, it is very important to know one's limitations and have a plan for failed procedures including consulting a colleague or referring the patient to a center with more expertise. In addition, a process of quality improvement is integral to every endoscopy center to address areas of underperformance, improve patient care and decrease liability.",
keywords = "endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, endoscopic sphincterotomy, hemorrhage, indomethacin, infection, intestinal perforation, pancreatitis, radiation, sedation, Stent",
author = "Kachaamy, {Toufic A.} and Faigel, {Douglas Orrick}",
year = "2013",
month = "8",
doi = "10.1586/17474124.2013.824703",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "7",
pages = "531--540",
journal = "Expert Review of Gastroenterology and Hepatology",
issn = "1747-4124",
publisher = "Expert Reviews Ltd.",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Improving ERCP quality and decreasing risk to patients and providers

AU - Kachaamy, Toufic A.

AU - Faigel, Douglas Orrick

PY - 2013/8

Y1 - 2013/8

N2 - Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) continues to be one of the most complex gastrointestinal procedures and carries the highest risk of complications. Optimizing the outcome of ERCP requires a fine balance between the risk and the benefit of every maneuver performed. This fine balance has to include an analysis of the indication for the procedure, the optimal timing, the setting where the procedure is performed, the endoscopist and staff training and expertise, availability of surgical and interventional radiology support, the risk of every maneuver and ways to minimize this risk. As in any other procedure, it is very important to know one's limitations and have a plan for failed procedures including consulting a colleague or referring the patient to a center with more expertise. In addition, a process of quality improvement is integral to every endoscopy center to address areas of underperformance, improve patient care and decrease liability.

AB - Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) continues to be one of the most complex gastrointestinal procedures and carries the highest risk of complications. Optimizing the outcome of ERCP requires a fine balance between the risk and the benefit of every maneuver performed. This fine balance has to include an analysis of the indication for the procedure, the optimal timing, the setting where the procedure is performed, the endoscopist and staff training and expertise, availability of surgical and interventional radiology support, the risk of every maneuver and ways to minimize this risk. As in any other procedure, it is very important to know one's limitations and have a plan for failed procedures including consulting a colleague or referring the patient to a center with more expertise. In addition, a process of quality improvement is integral to every endoscopy center to address areas of underperformance, improve patient care and decrease liability.

KW - endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography

KW - endoscopic sphincterotomy

KW - hemorrhage

KW - indomethacin

KW - infection

KW - intestinal perforation

KW - pancreatitis

KW - radiation

KW - sedation

KW - Stent

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84887853940&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84887853940&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1586/17474124.2013.824703

DO - 10.1586/17474124.2013.824703

M3 - Article

C2 - 23985002

AN - SCOPUS:84887853940

VL - 7

SP - 531

EP - 540

JO - Expert Review of Gastroenterology and Hepatology

JF - Expert Review of Gastroenterology and Hepatology

SN - 1747-4124

IS - 6

ER -