Improved image quality and detection of acute cerebral infarction with PROPELLER diffusion-weighted MR imaging

Kirsten P. Forbes, James Pipe, John P. Karis, Joseph E. Heiserman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

89 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare periodically rotated overlapping parallel lines with enhanced reconstruction (PROPELLER) multishot fast spin-echo diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance (MR) imaging with single-shot echo-planar diffusion-weighted MR imaging for image quality and visualization of acute cerebral infarction. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seventy subjects (35 men, 35 women; mean age, 55 years ± 24 [SD]) who were suspected of having acute cerebral infarction (symptom duration, 2.8 days ± 2.7) underwent PROPELLER and echo-planar MR imaging (b = 1,000 sec/mm2). Two neuroradiologists compared unlabeled images for presence of artifacts, visualization of infarction, and their preference of images. Interobserver agreement and image comparison were assessed by using the κ statistic and the χ2 test, respectively. RESULTS: PROPELLER MR imaging reduced susceptibility artifacts (n = 70 subjects), which limited visualization of temporal (echo-planar, n = 64; PROPELLER, n = 0; P < .01, χ2 test), frontal (echo-planar, n = 58; PROPELLER, n = 1; P < .01), and parietal lobes (echo-planar, n = 5; PROPELLER, n = 0; P < .05) and cerebellum (echo-planar, n = 36; PROPELLER, n = 0; P < .01) and brainstem (echo-planar, n = 23; PROPELLER, n = 0; P < .01). Acute infarction (n = 31 subjects) was better demonstrated at PROPELLER MR imaging (PROPELLER better, n = 18; echo-planar better, n = 1; PROPELLER and echo-planar equal, n = 12; P < .01, χ2 test). PROPELLER MR imaging was preferred in all (n = 70) but one case in which the lesion lay within the intersection gap (PROPELLER preferred, n = 69; echo-planar preferred, n = 1; P < .01, χ2 test). CONCLUSION: With a short increase in imaging time, PROPELLER MR imaging offers better image quality and detection of acute cerebral infarction than does echo-planar MR imaging.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)551-555
Number of pages5
JournalRadiology
Volume225
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1 2002
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Cerebral Infarction
Echo-Planar Imaging
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Artifacts
Infarction
Parietal Lobe
Cerebellum
Brain Stem

Keywords

  • Brain, infarction
  • Magnetic resonance (MR), diffusion study
  • Magnetic resonance (MR), k-space
  • Magnetic resonance (MR), pulse sequences

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

Improved image quality and detection of acute cerebral infarction with PROPELLER diffusion-weighted MR imaging. / Forbes, Kirsten P.; Pipe, James; Karis, John P.; Heiserman, Joseph E.

In: Radiology, Vol. 225, No. 2, 01.11.2002, p. 551-555.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Forbes, Kirsten P. ; Pipe, James ; Karis, John P. ; Heiserman, Joseph E. / Improved image quality and detection of acute cerebral infarction with PROPELLER diffusion-weighted MR imaging. In: Radiology. 2002 ; Vol. 225, No. 2. pp. 551-555.
@article{974b4f31156e4fbd8102db5bd5f31b3e,
title = "Improved image quality and detection of acute cerebral infarction with PROPELLER diffusion-weighted MR imaging",
abstract = "PURPOSE: To compare periodically rotated overlapping parallel lines with enhanced reconstruction (PROPELLER) multishot fast spin-echo diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance (MR) imaging with single-shot echo-planar diffusion-weighted MR imaging for image quality and visualization of acute cerebral infarction. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seventy subjects (35 men, 35 women; mean age, 55 years ± 24 [SD]) who were suspected of having acute cerebral infarction (symptom duration, 2.8 days ± 2.7) underwent PROPELLER and echo-planar MR imaging (b = 1,000 sec/mm2). Two neuroradiologists compared unlabeled images for presence of artifacts, visualization of infarction, and their preference of images. Interobserver agreement and image comparison were assessed by using the κ statistic and the χ2 test, respectively. RESULTS: PROPELLER MR imaging reduced susceptibility artifacts (n = 70 subjects), which limited visualization of temporal (echo-planar, n = 64; PROPELLER, n = 0; P < .01, χ2 test), frontal (echo-planar, n = 58; PROPELLER, n = 1; P < .01), and parietal lobes (echo-planar, n = 5; PROPELLER, n = 0; P < .05) and cerebellum (echo-planar, n = 36; PROPELLER, n = 0; P < .01) and brainstem (echo-planar, n = 23; PROPELLER, n = 0; P < .01). Acute infarction (n = 31 subjects) was better demonstrated at PROPELLER MR imaging (PROPELLER better, n = 18; echo-planar better, n = 1; PROPELLER and echo-planar equal, n = 12; P < .01, χ2 test). PROPELLER MR imaging was preferred in all (n = 70) but one case in which the lesion lay within the intersection gap (PROPELLER preferred, n = 69; echo-planar preferred, n = 1; P < .01, χ2 test). CONCLUSION: With a short increase in imaging time, PROPELLER MR imaging offers better image quality and detection of acute cerebral infarction than does echo-planar MR imaging.",
keywords = "Brain, infarction, Magnetic resonance (MR), diffusion study, Magnetic resonance (MR), k-space, Magnetic resonance (MR), pulse sequences",
author = "Forbes, {Kirsten P.} and James Pipe and Karis, {John P.} and Heiserman, {Joseph E.}",
year = "2002",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1148/radiol.2252011479",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "225",
pages = "551--555",
journal = "Radiology",
issn = "0033-8419",
publisher = "Radiological Society of North America Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Improved image quality and detection of acute cerebral infarction with PROPELLER diffusion-weighted MR imaging

AU - Forbes, Kirsten P.

AU - Pipe, James

AU - Karis, John P.

AU - Heiserman, Joseph E.

PY - 2002/11/1

Y1 - 2002/11/1

N2 - PURPOSE: To compare periodically rotated overlapping parallel lines with enhanced reconstruction (PROPELLER) multishot fast spin-echo diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance (MR) imaging with single-shot echo-planar diffusion-weighted MR imaging for image quality and visualization of acute cerebral infarction. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seventy subjects (35 men, 35 women; mean age, 55 years ± 24 [SD]) who were suspected of having acute cerebral infarction (symptom duration, 2.8 days ± 2.7) underwent PROPELLER and echo-planar MR imaging (b = 1,000 sec/mm2). Two neuroradiologists compared unlabeled images for presence of artifacts, visualization of infarction, and their preference of images. Interobserver agreement and image comparison were assessed by using the κ statistic and the χ2 test, respectively. RESULTS: PROPELLER MR imaging reduced susceptibility artifacts (n = 70 subjects), which limited visualization of temporal (echo-planar, n = 64; PROPELLER, n = 0; P < .01, χ2 test), frontal (echo-planar, n = 58; PROPELLER, n = 1; P < .01), and parietal lobes (echo-planar, n = 5; PROPELLER, n = 0; P < .05) and cerebellum (echo-planar, n = 36; PROPELLER, n = 0; P < .01) and brainstem (echo-planar, n = 23; PROPELLER, n = 0; P < .01). Acute infarction (n = 31 subjects) was better demonstrated at PROPELLER MR imaging (PROPELLER better, n = 18; echo-planar better, n = 1; PROPELLER and echo-planar equal, n = 12; P < .01, χ2 test). PROPELLER MR imaging was preferred in all (n = 70) but one case in which the lesion lay within the intersection gap (PROPELLER preferred, n = 69; echo-planar preferred, n = 1; P < .01, χ2 test). CONCLUSION: With a short increase in imaging time, PROPELLER MR imaging offers better image quality and detection of acute cerebral infarction than does echo-planar MR imaging.

AB - PURPOSE: To compare periodically rotated overlapping parallel lines with enhanced reconstruction (PROPELLER) multishot fast spin-echo diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance (MR) imaging with single-shot echo-planar diffusion-weighted MR imaging for image quality and visualization of acute cerebral infarction. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seventy subjects (35 men, 35 women; mean age, 55 years ± 24 [SD]) who were suspected of having acute cerebral infarction (symptom duration, 2.8 days ± 2.7) underwent PROPELLER and echo-planar MR imaging (b = 1,000 sec/mm2). Two neuroradiologists compared unlabeled images for presence of artifacts, visualization of infarction, and their preference of images. Interobserver agreement and image comparison were assessed by using the κ statistic and the χ2 test, respectively. RESULTS: PROPELLER MR imaging reduced susceptibility artifacts (n = 70 subjects), which limited visualization of temporal (echo-planar, n = 64; PROPELLER, n = 0; P < .01, χ2 test), frontal (echo-planar, n = 58; PROPELLER, n = 1; P < .01), and parietal lobes (echo-planar, n = 5; PROPELLER, n = 0; P < .05) and cerebellum (echo-planar, n = 36; PROPELLER, n = 0; P < .01) and brainstem (echo-planar, n = 23; PROPELLER, n = 0; P < .01). Acute infarction (n = 31 subjects) was better demonstrated at PROPELLER MR imaging (PROPELLER better, n = 18; echo-planar better, n = 1; PROPELLER and echo-planar equal, n = 12; P < .01, χ2 test). PROPELLER MR imaging was preferred in all (n = 70) but one case in which the lesion lay within the intersection gap (PROPELLER preferred, n = 69; echo-planar preferred, n = 1; P < .01, χ2 test). CONCLUSION: With a short increase in imaging time, PROPELLER MR imaging offers better image quality and detection of acute cerebral infarction than does echo-planar MR imaging.

KW - Brain, infarction

KW - Magnetic resonance (MR), diffusion study

KW - Magnetic resonance (MR), k-space

KW - Magnetic resonance (MR), pulse sequences

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0036829562&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0036829562&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1148/radiol.2252011479

DO - 10.1148/radiol.2252011479

M3 - Article

C2 - 12409594

AN - SCOPUS:0036829562

VL - 225

SP - 551

EP - 555

JO - Radiology

JF - Radiology

SN - 0033-8419

IS - 2

ER -