TY - JOUR
T1 - Improved coronary calcification quantification using photon-counting-detector CT
T2 - an ex vivo study in cadaveric specimens
AU - Sandstedt, Mårten
AU - Marsh, Jeffrey
AU - Rajendran, Kishore
AU - Gong, Hao
AU - Tao, Shengzhen
AU - Persson, Anders
AU - Leng, Shuai
AU - McCollough, Cynthia
N1 - Funding Information:
The research reported in this work was supported by the National Institutes of Health under awards R01 EB016966 and C06 RR018898. This work was supported in part by the Mayo Clinic X-ray Imaging Research Core. This research project was also supported by the Mayo Clinic-Karolinska Institutet Collaboration platform and by ALF grants, Region Östergötland.
Funding Information:
Research support for this work was provided, in part, to the Mayo Clinic from Siemens Healthcare GmbH. The research CT system used in this work was provided by Siemens Healthcare GmbH; it is not commercially available.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021, European Society of Radiology.
PY - 2021/9
Y1 - 2021/9
N2 - Objectives: To compare the accuracy of coronary calcium quantification of cadaveric specimens imaged from a photon-counting detector (PCD)-CT and an energy-integrating detector (EID)-CT. Methods: Excised coronary specimens were scanned on a PCD-CT scanner, using both the PCD and EID subsystems. The scanning and reconstruction parameters for EID-CT and PCD-CT were matched: 120 kV, 9.3–9.4 mGy CTDIvol, and a quantitative kernel (D50). PCD-CT images were also reconstructed using a sharper kernel (D60). Scanning the same specimens using micro-CT served as a reference standard for calcified volumes. Calcifications were segmented with a half-maximum thresholding technique. Segmented calcified volume differences were analyzed using the Friedman test and post hoc pairwise Wilcoxon signed rank test with the Bonferroni correction. Image noise measurements were compared between EID-CT and PCD-CT with a repeated-measures ANOVA test and post hoc pairwise comparison with the Bonferroni correction. A p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: The volume measurements in 12/13 calcifications followed a similar trend: EID-D50 > PCD-D50 > PCD-D60 > micro-CT. The median calcified volumes in EID-D50, PCD-D50, PCD-D60, and micro-CT were 22.1 (IQR 10.2–64.8), 21.0 (IQR 9.0–56.5), 18.2 (IQR 8.3–49.3), and 14.6 (IQR 5.1–42.4) mm3, respectively (p < 0.05 for all pairwise comparisons). The average image noise in EID-D50, PCD-D50, and PCD-D60 was 60.4 (± 3.5), 56.0 (± 4.2), and 113.6 (± 8.5) HU, respectively (p < 0.01 for all pairwise comparisons). Conclusion: The PCT-CT system quantified coronary calcifications more accurately than EID-CT, and a sharp PCD-CT kernel further improved the accuracy. The PCD-CT images exhibited lower noise than the EID-CT images. Key Points: • High spatial resolution offered by PCD-CT reduces partial volume averaging and consequently leads to better morphological depiction of coronary calcifications. • Improved quantitative accuracy for coronary calcification volumes could be achieved using high-resolution PCD-CT compared to conventional EID-CT. • PCD-CT images exhibit lower image noise than conventional EID-CT at matched radiation dose and reconstruction kernel.
AB - Objectives: To compare the accuracy of coronary calcium quantification of cadaveric specimens imaged from a photon-counting detector (PCD)-CT and an energy-integrating detector (EID)-CT. Methods: Excised coronary specimens were scanned on a PCD-CT scanner, using both the PCD and EID subsystems. The scanning and reconstruction parameters for EID-CT and PCD-CT were matched: 120 kV, 9.3–9.4 mGy CTDIvol, and a quantitative kernel (D50). PCD-CT images were also reconstructed using a sharper kernel (D60). Scanning the same specimens using micro-CT served as a reference standard for calcified volumes. Calcifications were segmented with a half-maximum thresholding technique. Segmented calcified volume differences were analyzed using the Friedman test and post hoc pairwise Wilcoxon signed rank test with the Bonferroni correction. Image noise measurements were compared between EID-CT and PCD-CT with a repeated-measures ANOVA test and post hoc pairwise comparison with the Bonferroni correction. A p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: The volume measurements in 12/13 calcifications followed a similar trend: EID-D50 > PCD-D50 > PCD-D60 > micro-CT. The median calcified volumes in EID-D50, PCD-D50, PCD-D60, and micro-CT were 22.1 (IQR 10.2–64.8), 21.0 (IQR 9.0–56.5), 18.2 (IQR 8.3–49.3), and 14.6 (IQR 5.1–42.4) mm3, respectively (p < 0.05 for all pairwise comparisons). The average image noise in EID-D50, PCD-D50, and PCD-D60 was 60.4 (± 3.5), 56.0 (± 4.2), and 113.6 (± 8.5) HU, respectively (p < 0.01 for all pairwise comparisons). Conclusion: The PCT-CT system quantified coronary calcifications more accurately than EID-CT, and a sharp PCD-CT kernel further improved the accuracy. The PCD-CT images exhibited lower noise than the EID-CT images. Key Points: • High spatial resolution offered by PCD-CT reduces partial volume averaging and consequently leads to better morphological depiction of coronary calcifications. • Improved quantitative accuracy for coronary calcification volumes could be achieved using high-resolution PCD-CT compared to conventional EID-CT. • PCD-CT images exhibit lower image noise than conventional EID-CT at matched radiation dose and reconstruction kernel.
KW - Artifacts
KW - Cadaver
KW - Coronary artery disease
KW - X-ray tomography
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85102697280&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85102697280&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s00330-021-07780-6
DO - 10.1007/s00330-021-07780-6
M3 - Article
C2 - 33713174
AN - SCOPUS:85102697280
SN - 0938-7994
VL - 31
SP - 6621
EP - 6630
JO - European Radiology
JF - European Radiology
IS - 9
ER -