Implantable cardioverter defibrillator electrogram adjudication for device registries: Methodology and observations from ALTITUDE

Brian D. Powell, Yong-Mei Cha, Samuel J Asirvatham, David A. Cesario, Michael Cao, Paul W. Jones, Milan Seth, Leslie A. Saxon, F. Roosevelt Gilliam

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

24 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: The increasing use of remote monitoring with the associated large retrievable databases provides a unique opportunity to analyze observations on implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapies. Adjudication of a large number of stored ICD electrograms (EGMs) presents a unique challenge. The ALTITUDE study group was designed to use the LATITUDE remote monitoring system to evaluate ICD patient outcomes across the United States. Methods and Results: Of 81,081 patients on remote monitoring, a random sample of 2,000 patients having 5,279 shock episodes was selected. The ALTITUDE EGM review committee was comprised of seven electrophysiologists from four institutions. An online EGM adjudication system was designed. Episodes were classified as appropriate (70% of shock episodes) or inappropriate ICD therapies (30%). Light's Kappa was used to assess agreement. Interobserver and intraobserver Kappa scores for dual-chamber ICDs were 0.84 (0.71-0.91) and 0.89 (0.82-0.95), consistent with substantial agreement. Interobserver and intraobserver Kappa scores for single-chamber ICDs were 0.61 (0.54-0.67) and 0.69 (0.59-0.79). The rhythm categories of "nonsustained arrhythmia" and "polymorphic and monomorphic ventricular tachycardia" resulted in the greatest degree of discordant adjudication between reviewers. Conclusions: This method of adjudication of a large volume of stored EGM data prior to device therapies will allow new observations in regards to device performance and has the potential to improve device programming and design. There was substantial interreviewer agreement for rhythm classification. Agreement was greater for dual-chamber compared to single-chamber devices, indicating the atrial lead adds diagnostic value in rhythm interpretation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1003-1012
Number of pages10
JournalPACE - Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology
Volume34
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 2011

Fingerprint

Implantable Defibrillators
Registries
Equipment and Supplies
Shock
Equipment Design
Advisory Committees
Ventricular Tachycardia
Cardiac Arrhythmias
Therapeutics
Databases

Keywords

  • ambulatory arrhythmias
  • cardiac methods
  • database management systems monitoring
  • defibrillators
  • implantable cardiac resynchronization therapy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cite this

Implantable cardioverter defibrillator electrogram adjudication for device registries : Methodology and observations from ALTITUDE. / Powell, Brian D.; Cha, Yong-Mei; Asirvatham, Samuel J; Cesario, David A.; Cao, Michael; Jones, Paul W.; Seth, Milan; Saxon, Leslie A.; Gilliam, F. Roosevelt.

In: PACE - Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, Vol. 34, No. 8, 08.2011, p. 1003-1012.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Powell, Brian D. ; Cha, Yong-Mei ; Asirvatham, Samuel J ; Cesario, David A. ; Cao, Michael ; Jones, Paul W. ; Seth, Milan ; Saxon, Leslie A. ; Gilliam, F. Roosevelt. / Implantable cardioverter defibrillator electrogram adjudication for device registries : Methodology and observations from ALTITUDE. In: PACE - Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology. 2011 ; Vol. 34, No. 8. pp. 1003-1012.
@article{5896de02464c4a5a9221b9403402a338,
title = "Implantable cardioverter defibrillator electrogram adjudication for device registries: Methodology and observations from ALTITUDE",
abstract = "Background: The increasing use of remote monitoring with the associated large retrievable databases provides a unique opportunity to analyze observations on implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapies. Adjudication of a large number of stored ICD electrograms (EGMs) presents a unique challenge. The ALTITUDE study group was designed to use the LATITUDE remote monitoring system to evaluate ICD patient outcomes across the United States. Methods and Results: Of 81,081 patients on remote monitoring, a random sample of 2,000 patients having 5,279 shock episodes was selected. The ALTITUDE EGM review committee was comprised of seven electrophysiologists from four institutions. An online EGM adjudication system was designed. Episodes were classified as appropriate (70{\%} of shock episodes) or inappropriate ICD therapies (30{\%}). Light's Kappa was used to assess agreement. Interobserver and intraobserver Kappa scores for dual-chamber ICDs were 0.84 (0.71-0.91) and 0.89 (0.82-0.95), consistent with substantial agreement. Interobserver and intraobserver Kappa scores for single-chamber ICDs were 0.61 (0.54-0.67) and 0.69 (0.59-0.79). The rhythm categories of {"}nonsustained arrhythmia{"} and {"}polymorphic and monomorphic ventricular tachycardia{"} resulted in the greatest degree of discordant adjudication between reviewers. Conclusions: This method of adjudication of a large volume of stored EGM data prior to device therapies will allow new observations in regards to device performance and has the potential to improve device programming and design. There was substantial interreviewer agreement for rhythm classification. Agreement was greater for dual-chamber compared to single-chamber devices, indicating the atrial lead adds diagnostic value in rhythm interpretation.",
keywords = "ambulatory arrhythmias, cardiac methods, database management systems monitoring, defibrillators, implantable cardiac resynchronization therapy",
author = "Powell, {Brian D.} and Yong-Mei Cha and Asirvatham, {Samuel J} and Cesario, {David A.} and Michael Cao and Jones, {Paul W.} and Milan Seth and Saxon, {Leslie A.} and Gilliam, {F. Roosevelt}",
year = "2011",
month = "8",
doi = "10.1111/j.1540-8159.2011.03093.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "34",
pages = "1003--1012",
journal = "PACE - Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology",
issn = "0147-8389",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Implantable cardioverter defibrillator electrogram adjudication for device registries

T2 - Methodology and observations from ALTITUDE

AU - Powell, Brian D.

AU - Cha, Yong-Mei

AU - Asirvatham, Samuel J

AU - Cesario, David A.

AU - Cao, Michael

AU - Jones, Paul W.

AU - Seth, Milan

AU - Saxon, Leslie A.

AU - Gilliam, F. Roosevelt

PY - 2011/8

Y1 - 2011/8

N2 - Background: The increasing use of remote monitoring with the associated large retrievable databases provides a unique opportunity to analyze observations on implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapies. Adjudication of a large number of stored ICD electrograms (EGMs) presents a unique challenge. The ALTITUDE study group was designed to use the LATITUDE remote monitoring system to evaluate ICD patient outcomes across the United States. Methods and Results: Of 81,081 patients on remote monitoring, a random sample of 2,000 patients having 5,279 shock episodes was selected. The ALTITUDE EGM review committee was comprised of seven electrophysiologists from four institutions. An online EGM adjudication system was designed. Episodes were classified as appropriate (70% of shock episodes) or inappropriate ICD therapies (30%). Light's Kappa was used to assess agreement. Interobserver and intraobserver Kappa scores for dual-chamber ICDs were 0.84 (0.71-0.91) and 0.89 (0.82-0.95), consistent with substantial agreement. Interobserver and intraobserver Kappa scores for single-chamber ICDs were 0.61 (0.54-0.67) and 0.69 (0.59-0.79). The rhythm categories of "nonsustained arrhythmia" and "polymorphic and monomorphic ventricular tachycardia" resulted in the greatest degree of discordant adjudication between reviewers. Conclusions: This method of adjudication of a large volume of stored EGM data prior to device therapies will allow new observations in regards to device performance and has the potential to improve device programming and design. There was substantial interreviewer agreement for rhythm classification. Agreement was greater for dual-chamber compared to single-chamber devices, indicating the atrial lead adds diagnostic value in rhythm interpretation.

AB - Background: The increasing use of remote monitoring with the associated large retrievable databases provides a unique opportunity to analyze observations on implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapies. Adjudication of a large number of stored ICD electrograms (EGMs) presents a unique challenge. The ALTITUDE study group was designed to use the LATITUDE remote monitoring system to evaluate ICD patient outcomes across the United States. Methods and Results: Of 81,081 patients on remote monitoring, a random sample of 2,000 patients having 5,279 shock episodes was selected. The ALTITUDE EGM review committee was comprised of seven electrophysiologists from four institutions. An online EGM adjudication system was designed. Episodes were classified as appropriate (70% of shock episodes) or inappropriate ICD therapies (30%). Light's Kappa was used to assess agreement. Interobserver and intraobserver Kappa scores for dual-chamber ICDs were 0.84 (0.71-0.91) and 0.89 (0.82-0.95), consistent with substantial agreement. Interobserver and intraobserver Kappa scores for single-chamber ICDs were 0.61 (0.54-0.67) and 0.69 (0.59-0.79). The rhythm categories of "nonsustained arrhythmia" and "polymorphic and monomorphic ventricular tachycardia" resulted in the greatest degree of discordant adjudication between reviewers. Conclusions: This method of adjudication of a large volume of stored EGM data prior to device therapies will allow new observations in regards to device performance and has the potential to improve device programming and design. There was substantial interreviewer agreement for rhythm classification. Agreement was greater for dual-chamber compared to single-chamber devices, indicating the atrial lead adds diagnostic value in rhythm interpretation.

KW - ambulatory arrhythmias

KW - cardiac methods

KW - database management systems monitoring

KW - defibrillators

KW - implantable cardiac resynchronization therapy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=80051695712&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=80051695712&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2011.03093.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2011.03093.x

M3 - Article

C2 - 21453341

AN - SCOPUS:80051695712

VL - 34

SP - 1003

EP - 1012

JO - PACE - Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology

JF - PACE - Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology

SN - 0147-8389

IS - 8

ER -