Impact of Self-citation on the H Index in the Field of Academic Radiology

Arash Ehteshami Rad, Leili Shahgholi, David F Kallmes

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

45 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Rationale and Objectives: The Hirsch Index (H index) is widely applied as a metric of scientific productivity. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the role of self-citation on the H index in academic radiology. Materials and Methods: Through the National Resident Matching Program's Web site, one third (47/139) of radiology residency programs were selected randomly. All chairpersons and full professors were included. Using the Scopus database, we calculated the H index as well as the number of cumulative citations with and without inclusion of self-citations. We determined the proportion of academic staff in which H index increased by one, two, or greater than two integers. We also correlated the proportional increase in H index before and after inclusion of self citations with the number of publications. Results: A total of 487 academic staff (47 chair and 440 professors) was identified. Because of self-citation, mean ± SD of the H index increased from 13.7 ± 9.9 to 14.0 ± 10.2; mean ± SD of cumulative citations increased from 1804 ± 1889 to 1870 ± 1971. H index numbers did not change in 376/487 (77%) authors as a result of self-citation. There was no correlation between number of publications and proportional change of H index. Conclusion: The effect of self-citation is minimal in academic radiology, as evidenced by the fact that cumulative citations increase by only 2% and the large majority of H index values do not change by even a single integer after inclusion of self-citation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)455-457
Number of pages3
JournalAcademic Radiology
Volume19
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2012

Fingerprint

Radiology
Publications
Internship and Residency
Databases

Keywords

  • Hindex
  • Radiology
  • Self citation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

Impact of Self-citation on the H Index in the Field of Academic Radiology. / Rad, Arash Ehteshami; Shahgholi, Leili; Kallmes, David F.

In: Academic Radiology, Vol. 19, No. 4, 04.2012, p. 455-457.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Rad, Arash Ehteshami ; Shahgholi, Leili ; Kallmes, David F. / Impact of Self-citation on the H Index in the Field of Academic Radiology. In: Academic Radiology. 2012 ; Vol. 19, No. 4. pp. 455-457.
@article{f461f1cb91a94b1d80e63d7dc4f6d7fd,
title = "Impact of Self-citation on the H Index in the Field of Academic Radiology",
abstract = "Rationale and Objectives: The Hirsch Index (H index) is widely applied as a metric of scientific productivity. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the role of self-citation on the H index in academic radiology. Materials and Methods: Through the National Resident Matching Program's Web site, one third (47/139) of radiology residency programs were selected randomly. All chairpersons and full professors were included. Using the Scopus database, we calculated the H index as well as the number of cumulative citations with and without inclusion of self-citations. We determined the proportion of academic staff in which H index increased by one, two, or greater than two integers. We also correlated the proportional increase in H index before and after inclusion of self citations with the number of publications. Results: A total of 487 academic staff (47 chair and 440 professors) was identified. Because of self-citation, mean ± SD of the H index increased from 13.7 ± 9.9 to 14.0 ± 10.2; mean ± SD of cumulative citations increased from 1804 ± 1889 to 1870 ± 1971. H index numbers did not change in 376/487 (77{\%}) authors as a result of self-citation. There was no correlation between number of publications and proportional change of H index. Conclusion: The effect of self-citation is minimal in academic radiology, as evidenced by the fact that cumulative citations increase by only 2{\%} and the large majority of H index values do not change by even a single integer after inclusion of self-citation.",
keywords = "Hindex, Radiology, Self citation",
author = "Rad, {Arash Ehteshami} and Leili Shahgholi and Kallmes, {David F}",
year = "2012",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1016/j.acra.2011.11.013",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "19",
pages = "455--457",
journal = "Academic Radiology",
issn = "1076-6332",
publisher = "Elsevier USA",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Impact of Self-citation on the H Index in the Field of Academic Radiology

AU - Rad, Arash Ehteshami

AU - Shahgholi, Leili

AU - Kallmes, David F

PY - 2012/4

Y1 - 2012/4

N2 - Rationale and Objectives: The Hirsch Index (H index) is widely applied as a metric of scientific productivity. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the role of self-citation on the H index in academic radiology. Materials and Methods: Through the National Resident Matching Program's Web site, one third (47/139) of radiology residency programs were selected randomly. All chairpersons and full professors were included. Using the Scopus database, we calculated the H index as well as the number of cumulative citations with and without inclusion of self-citations. We determined the proportion of academic staff in which H index increased by one, two, or greater than two integers. We also correlated the proportional increase in H index before and after inclusion of self citations with the number of publications. Results: A total of 487 academic staff (47 chair and 440 professors) was identified. Because of self-citation, mean ± SD of the H index increased from 13.7 ± 9.9 to 14.0 ± 10.2; mean ± SD of cumulative citations increased from 1804 ± 1889 to 1870 ± 1971. H index numbers did not change in 376/487 (77%) authors as a result of self-citation. There was no correlation between number of publications and proportional change of H index. Conclusion: The effect of self-citation is minimal in academic radiology, as evidenced by the fact that cumulative citations increase by only 2% and the large majority of H index values do not change by even a single integer after inclusion of self-citation.

AB - Rationale and Objectives: The Hirsch Index (H index) is widely applied as a metric of scientific productivity. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the role of self-citation on the H index in academic radiology. Materials and Methods: Through the National Resident Matching Program's Web site, one third (47/139) of radiology residency programs were selected randomly. All chairpersons and full professors were included. Using the Scopus database, we calculated the H index as well as the number of cumulative citations with and without inclusion of self-citations. We determined the proportion of academic staff in which H index increased by one, two, or greater than two integers. We also correlated the proportional increase in H index before and after inclusion of self citations with the number of publications. Results: A total of 487 academic staff (47 chair and 440 professors) was identified. Because of self-citation, mean ± SD of the H index increased from 13.7 ± 9.9 to 14.0 ± 10.2; mean ± SD of cumulative citations increased from 1804 ± 1889 to 1870 ± 1971. H index numbers did not change in 376/487 (77%) authors as a result of self-citation. There was no correlation between number of publications and proportional change of H index. Conclusion: The effect of self-citation is minimal in academic radiology, as evidenced by the fact that cumulative citations increase by only 2% and the large majority of H index values do not change by even a single integer after inclusion of self-citation.

KW - Hindex

KW - Radiology

KW - Self citation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84858795860&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84858795860&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.acra.2011.11.013

DO - 10.1016/j.acra.2011.11.013

M3 - Article

C2 - 22285543

AN - SCOPUS:84858795860

VL - 19

SP - 455

EP - 457

JO - Academic Radiology

JF - Academic Radiology

SN - 1076-6332

IS - 4

ER -