Impact of screening versus symptomatic measurement of deep vein thrombosis in a national quality improvement registry.

Randall R De Martino, Adam W. Beck, Matthew S. Edwards, Matthew A. Corriere, Jessica B. Wallaert, David H. Stone, Jack L. Cronenwett, Philip P. Goodney

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) is a quality measure recorded by initiatives such as the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP). However, because surveillance-detected DVT rates may be higher than symptomatic DVT rates, we examined how differences in the method of DVT detection may affect the use of this quality measure. Using the NSQIP database (2007-2009), we compared DVT rates of vascular (amputation, open aortic procedures, and lower extremity bypass) and nonvascular (prostatectomy, gastric bypass [GBP], and hip arthroplasty) operations. Using a predefined literature search strategy, we compared the incidence of DVT in NSQIP to the incidence of DVT reported in published literature, diagnosed by symptomatic status or by surveillance studies. Within NSQIP, the overall incidence of postoperative DVT was 0.7%. This varied from 0.3% after GBP to 1.8% after open aortic surgery. Across all procedures except amputation, the incidence of DVT in NSQIP was similar to the incidence of DVT reported in our literature survey of "symptomatic" DVTs. The relative rate (RR) of literature-derived symptomatic DVTs to NSQIP ranged from 0.7 for aortic cases (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.3-1.7) to 1.4 (95% CI, .7-3.1) for GBP. Overall, surveillance studies had 11.6 higher RR of DVT compared to NSQIP (95% CI, 10.5-13), ranging from 2.6 for GBP (95% CI, 1.4-5) to 14 .5 for hip arthroplasty (95% CI, 10.5-20). The incidence of DVT reported in NSQIP is similar to the reported incidence of symptomatic DVT for many high-risk procedures but is much lower than rates of DVT reported in surveillance studies. Clear delineation of symptomatic vs surveillance detection of DVT would improve the usefulness of this measurement in quality improvement registries.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalJournal of Vascular Surgery
Volume56
Issue number4
StatePublished - Oct 2012
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Quality Improvement
Venous Thrombosis
Registries
Gastric Bypass
Incidence
Confidence Intervals
Amputation
Arthroplasty
Hip
Prostatectomy
Blood Vessels
Lower Extremity

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Surgery

Cite this

De Martino, R. R., Beck, A. W., Edwards, M. S., Corriere, M. A., Wallaert, J. B., Stone, D. H., ... Goodney, P. P. (2012). Impact of screening versus symptomatic measurement of deep vein thrombosis in a national quality improvement registry. Journal of Vascular Surgery, 56(4).

Impact of screening versus symptomatic measurement of deep vein thrombosis in a national quality improvement registry. / De Martino, Randall R; Beck, Adam W.; Edwards, Matthew S.; Corriere, Matthew A.; Wallaert, Jessica B.; Stone, David H.; Cronenwett, Jack L.; Goodney, Philip P.

In: Journal of Vascular Surgery, Vol. 56, No. 4, 10.2012.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

De Martino, RR, Beck, AW, Edwards, MS, Corriere, MA, Wallaert, JB, Stone, DH, Cronenwett, JL & Goodney, PP 2012, 'Impact of screening versus symptomatic measurement of deep vein thrombosis in a national quality improvement registry.', Journal of Vascular Surgery, vol. 56, no. 4.
De Martino, Randall R ; Beck, Adam W. ; Edwards, Matthew S. ; Corriere, Matthew A. ; Wallaert, Jessica B. ; Stone, David H. ; Cronenwett, Jack L. ; Goodney, Philip P. / Impact of screening versus symptomatic measurement of deep vein thrombosis in a national quality improvement registry. In: Journal of Vascular Surgery. 2012 ; Vol. 56, No. 4.
@article{5d5d4354afcb449db24f7a50bc4ba0ac,
title = "Impact of screening versus symptomatic measurement of deep vein thrombosis in a national quality improvement registry.",
abstract = "Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) is a quality measure recorded by initiatives such as the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP). However, because surveillance-detected DVT rates may be higher than symptomatic DVT rates, we examined how differences in the method of DVT detection may affect the use of this quality measure. Using the NSQIP database (2007-2009), we compared DVT rates of vascular (amputation, open aortic procedures, and lower extremity bypass) and nonvascular (prostatectomy, gastric bypass [GBP], and hip arthroplasty) operations. Using a predefined literature search strategy, we compared the incidence of DVT in NSQIP to the incidence of DVT reported in published literature, diagnosed by symptomatic status or by surveillance studies. Within NSQIP, the overall incidence of postoperative DVT was 0.7{\%}. This varied from 0.3{\%} after GBP to 1.8{\%} after open aortic surgery. Across all procedures except amputation, the incidence of DVT in NSQIP was similar to the incidence of DVT reported in our literature survey of {"}symptomatic{"} DVTs. The relative rate (RR) of literature-derived symptomatic DVTs to NSQIP ranged from 0.7 for aortic cases (95{\%} confidence interval [CI], 0.3-1.7) to 1.4 (95{\%} CI, .7-3.1) for GBP. Overall, surveillance studies had 11.6 higher RR of DVT compared to NSQIP (95{\%} CI, 10.5-13), ranging from 2.6 for GBP (95{\%} CI, 1.4-5) to 14 .5 for hip arthroplasty (95{\%} CI, 10.5-20). The incidence of DVT reported in NSQIP is similar to the reported incidence of symptomatic DVT for many high-risk procedures but is much lower than rates of DVT reported in surveillance studies. Clear delineation of symptomatic vs surveillance detection of DVT would improve the usefulness of this measurement in quality improvement registries.",
author = "{De Martino}, {Randall R} and Beck, {Adam W.} and Edwards, {Matthew S.} and Corriere, {Matthew A.} and Wallaert, {Jessica B.} and Stone, {David H.} and Cronenwett, {Jack L.} and Goodney, {Philip P.}",
year = "2012",
month = "10",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "56",
journal = "Journal of Vascular Surgery",
issn = "0741-5214",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Impact of screening versus symptomatic measurement of deep vein thrombosis in a national quality improvement registry.

AU - De Martino, Randall R

AU - Beck, Adam W.

AU - Edwards, Matthew S.

AU - Corriere, Matthew A.

AU - Wallaert, Jessica B.

AU - Stone, David H.

AU - Cronenwett, Jack L.

AU - Goodney, Philip P.

PY - 2012/10

Y1 - 2012/10

N2 - Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) is a quality measure recorded by initiatives such as the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP). However, because surveillance-detected DVT rates may be higher than symptomatic DVT rates, we examined how differences in the method of DVT detection may affect the use of this quality measure. Using the NSQIP database (2007-2009), we compared DVT rates of vascular (amputation, open aortic procedures, and lower extremity bypass) and nonvascular (prostatectomy, gastric bypass [GBP], and hip arthroplasty) operations. Using a predefined literature search strategy, we compared the incidence of DVT in NSQIP to the incidence of DVT reported in published literature, diagnosed by symptomatic status or by surveillance studies. Within NSQIP, the overall incidence of postoperative DVT was 0.7%. This varied from 0.3% after GBP to 1.8% after open aortic surgery. Across all procedures except amputation, the incidence of DVT in NSQIP was similar to the incidence of DVT reported in our literature survey of "symptomatic" DVTs. The relative rate (RR) of literature-derived symptomatic DVTs to NSQIP ranged from 0.7 for aortic cases (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.3-1.7) to 1.4 (95% CI, .7-3.1) for GBP. Overall, surveillance studies had 11.6 higher RR of DVT compared to NSQIP (95% CI, 10.5-13), ranging from 2.6 for GBP (95% CI, 1.4-5) to 14 .5 for hip arthroplasty (95% CI, 10.5-20). The incidence of DVT reported in NSQIP is similar to the reported incidence of symptomatic DVT for many high-risk procedures but is much lower than rates of DVT reported in surveillance studies. Clear delineation of symptomatic vs surveillance detection of DVT would improve the usefulness of this measurement in quality improvement registries.

AB - Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) is a quality measure recorded by initiatives such as the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP). However, because surveillance-detected DVT rates may be higher than symptomatic DVT rates, we examined how differences in the method of DVT detection may affect the use of this quality measure. Using the NSQIP database (2007-2009), we compared DVT rates of vascular (amputation, open aortic procedures, and lower extremity bypass) and nonvascular (prostatectomy, gastric bypass [GBP], and hip arthroplasty) operations. Using a predefined literature search strategy, we compared the incidence of DVT in NSQIP to the incidence of DVT reported in published literature, diagnosed by symptomatic status or by surveillance studies. Within NSQIP, the overall incidence of postoperative DVT was 0.7%. This varied from 0.3% after GBP to 1.8% after open aortic surgery. Across all procedures except amputation, the incidence of DVT in NSQIP was similar to the incidence of DVT reported in our literature survey of "symptomatic" DVTs. The relative rate (RR) of literature-derived symptomatic DVTs to NSQIP ranged from 0.7 for aortic cases (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.3-1.7) to 1.4 (95% CI, .7-3.1) for GBP. Overall, surveillance studies had 11.6 higher RR of DVT compared to NSQIP (95% CI, 10.5-13), ranging from 2.6 for GBP (95% CI, 1.4-5) to 14 .5 for hip arthroplasty (95% CI, 10.5-20). The incidence of DVT reported in NSQIP is similar to the reported incidence of symptomatic DVT for many high-risk procedures but is much lower than rates of DVT reported in surveillance studies. Clear delineation of symptomatic vs surveillance detection of DVT would improve the usefulness of this measurement in quality improvement registries.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84872015309&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84872015309&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 22832263

AN - SCOPUS:84872015309

VL - 56

JO - Journal of Vascular Surgery

JF - Journal of Vascular Surgery

SN - 0741-5214

IS - 4

ER -