Impact of Patching and Atropine Treatment on the Child and Family in the Amblyopia Treatment Study

Jonathan M. Holmes, Roy W. Beck, Raymond T. Kraker, Stephen R. Cole, Michael X. Repka, Eileen E. Birch, Joost Felius, Stephen P. Christiansen, David K. Coats, Marjean T. Kulp

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

108 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objective: To assess the psychosocial impact on the child and family of patching and atropine as treatments for moderate amblyopia in children younger than 7 years. Methods: In a randomized, controlled clinical trial, 419 children younger than 7 years with amblyopic eye visual acuity in the range of 20/40 to 20/100 were assigned to receive treatment with either patching or atropine at 47 clinical sites. After 5 weeks of treatment, a parental quality-of-life questionnaire was completed for 364 (87%) of the 419 patients. Main Outcome Measure: Overall and subscale scores on the Amblyopia Treatment Index. Results: High internal validity and reliability were demonstrated for the Amblyopia Treatment Index questionnaire. The overall Amblyopia Treatment Index scores and the 3 subscale scores were consistently higher (worse) in the patching group compared with the atropine-treated group (overall mean, 2.52 vs 2.02, P<. 001; adverse effects of treatment: mean, 2.35 vs 2.11, P=.002; difficulty with compliance: mean, 2.46 vs 1.99, P<.001; and social stigma: mean, 3.09 vs 1.84, P<.001, respectively). Conclusion: Although the Amblyopia Treatment Index questionnaire results indicated that both atropine and patching treatments were well tolerated by the child and family, atropine received more favorable scores overall and on all 3 questionnaire subscales.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1625-1632
Number of pages8
JournalArchives of ophthalmology
Volume121
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2003

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ophthalmology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Impact of Patching and Atropine Treatment on the Child and Family in the Amblyopia Treatment Study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this