Impact of Feedback and Didactic Sessions on the Reporting Behavior of Upper Endoscopic Findings by Physicians and Nurses

Adil A. Abdalla, Bret Thomas Petersen, Beverly J. Ott, Mary Fredericksen, Cathy D. Schleck, Alan R. Zinsmeister, K. M J Grunewald, Teresa Zais, Yvonne Romero

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background & Aims: Guidelines for reporting Barrett's esophagus and hiatal hernia measurements and reflux esophagitis grades have been developed to improve consistency, communication, and, ultimately, patient care. Our aims were to assess the percentage of cases in which findings were reported in accordance with guidelines and to assess the impact of education and feedback on reporting behavior. Methods: Prospective cross-sectional study design was used. Chart reviews were performed for all adult patients who underwent esophagogastroduodenoscopy at a tertiary care center during three 2-month time periods during a 12-month interval: Time 1 (March 1, 2004-April 30, 2004), Time 2 (July 1, 2004-August 31, 2004), and Time 3 (March 1, 2005-April 30, 2005). Standardized educational sessions began 2 years before Time 1. No intervention took place between Time 1 and Time 2; data were collected to examine secular change. Between Time 2 and Time 3, individual and group feedback and refresher sessions were given. Results: Five thousand six hundred nine eligible esophagogastroduodenoscopies were performed, of which 2675 demonstrated Barrett's esophagus, hiatal hernia, and/or reflux esophagitis. At baseline, Barrett's esophagus and hiatal hernia measurements were dictated correctly in a median of 67% and 86% of cases, respectively, improving to 100% (P < .05) and 98% (P < .01) of cases, respectively. The Los Angeles Classification system was used in a median of 100% of cases at baseline and at follow-up. Conclusions: Anonymous individual and group feedback, in combination with brief, structured didactic educational sessions, significantly improves compliance with established guidelines for the reporting of Barrett's esophagus and hiatal hernia. Once successfully incorporated into clinical practice, adherence to the esophagitis Los Angeles Classification System is easy to maintain.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)326-330
Number of pages5
JournalClinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology
Volume5
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2007

Fingerprint

Nurses
Physicians
Hiatal Hernia
Barrett Esophagus
Digestive System Endoscopy
Peptic Esophagitis
Los Angeles
Guidelines
Esophagitis
Tertiary Care Centers
Patient Care
Cross-Sectional Studies
Communication
Education

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Gastroenterology

Cite this

Impact of Feedback and Didactic Sessions on the Reporting Behavior of Upper Endoscopic Findings by Physicians and Nurses. / Abdalla, Adil A.; Petersen, Bret Thomas; Ott, Beverly J.; Fredericksen, Mary; Schleck, Cathy D.; Zinsmeister, Alan R.; Grunewald, K. M J; Zais, Teresa; Romero, Yvonne.

In: Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Vol. 5, No. 3, 03.2007, p. 326-330.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abdalla, AA, Petersen, BT, Ott, BJ, Fredericksen, M, Schleck, CD, Zinsmeister, AR, Grunewald, KMJ, Zais, T & Romero, Y 2007, 'Impact of Feedback and Didactic Sessions on the Reporting Behavior of Upper Endoscopic Findings by Physicians and Nurses', Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 326-330. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cgh.2006.11.007
Abdalla, Adil A. ; Petersen, Bret Thomas ; Ott, Beverly J. ; Fredericksen, Mary ; Schleck, Cathy D. ; Zinsmeister, Alan R. ; Grunewald, K. M J ; Zais, Teresa ; Romero, Yvonne. / Impact of Feedback and Didactic Sessions on the Reporting Behavior of Upper Endoscopic Findings by Physicians and Nurses. In: Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology. 2007 ; Vol. 5, No. 3. pp. 326-330.
@article{3ef9cddefd7746a18f8d34d1d58e4102,
title = "Impact of Feedback and Didactic Sessions on the Reporting Behavior of Upper Endoscopic Findings by Physicians and Nurses",
abstract = "Background & Aims: Guidelines for reporting Barrett's esophagus and hiatal hernia measurements and reflux esophagitis grades have been developed to improve consistency, communication, and, ultimately, patient care. Our aims were to assess the percentage of cases in which findings were reported in accordance with guidelines and to assess the impact of education and feedback on reporting behavior. Methods: Prospective cross-sectional study design was used. Chart reviews were performed for all adult patients who underwent esophagogastroduodenoscopy at a tertiary care center during three 2-month time periods during a 12-month interval: Time 1 (March 1, 2004-April 30, 2004), Time 2 (July 1, 2004-August 31, 2004), and Time 3 (March 1, 2005-April 30, 2005). Standardized educational sessions began 2 years before Time 1. No intervention took place between Time 1 and Time 2; data were collected to examine secular change. Between Time 2 and Time 3, individual and group feedback and refresher sessions were given. Results: Five thousand six hundred nine eligible esophagogastroduodenoscopies were performed, of which 2675 demonstrated Barrett's esophagus, hiatal hernia, and/or reflux esophagitis. At baseline, Barrett's esophagus and hiatal hernia measurements were dictated correctly in a median of 67{\%} and 86{\%} of cases, respectively, improving to 100{\%} (P < .05) and 98{\%} (P < .01) of cases, respectively. The Los Angeles Classification system was used in a median of 100{\%} of cases at baseline and at follow-up. Conclusions: Anonymous individual and group feedback, in combination with brief, structured didactic educational sessions, significantly improves compliance with established guidelines for the reporting of Barrett's esophagus and hiatal hernia. Once successfully incorporated into clinical practice, adherence to the esophagitis Los Angeles Classification System is easy to maintain.",
author = "Abdalla, {Adil A.} and Petersen, {Bret Thomas} and Ott, {Beverly J.} and Mary Fredericksen and Schleck, {Cathy D.} and Zinsmeister, {Alan R.} and Grunewald, {K. M J} and Teresa Zais and Yvonne Romero",
year = "2007",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1016/j.cgh.2006.11.007",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "5",
pages = "326--330",
journal = "Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology",
issn = "1542-3565",
publisher = "W.B. Saunders Ltd",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Impact of Feedback and Didactic Sessions on the Reporting Behavior of Upper Endoscopic Findings by Physicians and Nurses

AU - Abdalla, Adil A.

AU - Petersen, Bret Thomas

AU - Ott, Beverly J.

AU - Fredericksen, Mary

AU - Schleck, Cathy D.

AU - Zinsmeister, Alan R.

AU - Grunewald, K. M J

AU - Zais, Teresa

AU - Romero, Yvonne

PY - 2007/3

Y1 - 2007/3

N2 - Background & Aims: Guidelines for reporting Barrett's esophagus and hiatal hernia measurements and reflux esophagitis grades have been developed to improve consistency, communication, and, ultimately, patient care. Our aims were to assess the percentage of cases in which findings were reported in accordance with guidelines and to assess the impact of education and feedback on reporting behavior. Methods: Prospective cross-sectional study design was used. Chart reviews were performed for all adult patients who underwent esophagogastroduodenoscopy at a tertiary care center during three 2-month time periods during a 12-month interval: Time 1 (March 1, 2004-April 30, 2004), Time 2 (July 1, 2004-August 31, 2004), and Time 3 (March 1, 2005-April 30, 2005). Standardized educational sessions began 2 years before Time 1. No intervention took place between Time 1 and Time 2; data were collected to examine secular change. Between Time 2 and Time 3, individual and group feedback and refresher sessions were given. Results: Five thousand six hundred nine eligible esophagogastroduodenoscopies were performed, of which 2675 demonstrated Barrett's esophagus, hiatal hernia, and/or reflux esophagitis. At baseline, Barrett's esophagus and hiatal hernia measurements were dictated correctly in a median of 67% and 86% of cases, respectively, improving to 100% (P < .05) and 98% (P < .01) of cases, respectively. The Los Angeles Classification system was used in a median of 100% of cases at baseline and at follow-up. Conclusions: Anonymous individual and group feedback, in combination with brief, structured didactic educational sessions, significantly improves compliance with established guidelines for the reporting of Barrett's esophagus and hiatal hernia. Once successfully incorporated into clinical practice, adherence to the esophagitis Los Angeles Classification System is easy to maintain.

AB - Background & Aims: Guidelines for reporting Barrett's esophagus and hiatal hernia measurements and reflux esophagitis grades have been developed to improve consistency, communication, and, ultimately, patient care. Our aims were to assess the percentage of cases in which findings were reported in accordance with guidelines and to assess the impact of education and feedback on reporting behavior. Methods: Prospective cross-sectional study design was used. Chart reviews were performed for all adult patients who underwent esophagogastroduodenoscopy at a tertiary care center during three 2-month time periods during a 12-month interval: Time 1 (March 1, 2004-April 30, 2004), Time 2 (July 1, 2004-August 31, 2004), and Time 3 (March 1, 2005-April 30, 2005). Standardized educational sessions began 2 years before Time 1. No intervention took place between Time 1 and Time 2; data were collected to examine secular change. Between Time 2 and Time 3, individual and group feedback and refresher sessions were given. Results: Five thousand six hundred nine eligible esophagogastroduodenoscopies were performed, of which 2675 demonstrated Barrett's esophagus, hiatal hernia, and/or reflux esophagitis. At baseline, Barrett's esophagus and hiatal hernia measurements were dictated correctly in a median of 67% and 86% of cases, respectively, improving to 100% (P < .05) and 98% (P < .01) of cases, respectively. The Los Angeles Classification system was used in a median of 100% of cases at baseline and at follow-up. Conclusions: Anonymous individual and group feedback, in combination with brief, structured didactic educational sessions, significantly improves compliance with established guidelines for the reporting of Barrett's esophagus and hiatal hernia. Once successfully incorporated into clinical practice, adherence to the esophagitis Los Angeles Classification System is easy to maintain.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33947128125&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33947128125&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.cgh.2006.11.007

DO - 10.1016/j.cgh.2006.11.007

M3 - Article

VL - 5

SP - 326

EP - 330

JO - Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology

JF - Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology

SN - 1542-3565

IS - 3

ER -