Impact of diagnosis-timing indicators on measures of safety, comorbidity, and case mix groupings from administrative data sources

James M Naessens, Claudia R. Campbell, Bjorn Berg, Arthur R. Williams, Richard Culbertson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

31 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Context: Many attempts to identify hospital complications rely on secondary diagnoses from billing data. To be meaningful, diagnosis codes must distinguish between diagnoses after admission and those existing before admission. Objective: To assess the influence of diagnoses at admission on patient safety, comorbidity, severity measures, and case mix groupings for Medicare reimbursement. Design: Cross-sectional association of various diagnosis-based clinical and performance measures with and without diagnosis present on admission. Setting: Hospital discharges from Mayo Clinic Rochester hospitals in 2005 (N = 60,599). Patients: All hospital inpatients including surgical, medical, pediatric, maternity, psychiatric, and rehabilitation patients. About 33% of patients traveled more than 120 miles for care. Main Outcome Measures: Hospital patient safety indicators, comorbidity, severity, and case mix measures with and without diagnoses present at admission. Results: Over 90% of all diagnoses were present at admission whereas 27.1% of all inpatients had a secondary diagnosis coded in-hospital. About one-third of discharges with a safety indicator were flagged because of a diagnosis already present at admission, more likely among referral patients. In contrast, 87% of postoperative hemorrhage, 22% of postoperative hip fractures, and 54% of foreign bodies left in wounds were coded as in-hospital conditions. Severity changes during hospitalization were observed, in less than 8% of discharges. Slightly over 3% of discharges were assigned to higher weight diagnosis-related groups based on an in-hospital complication. Conclusions: In general, many patient safety indicators do not reliably identify adverse hospital events, especially when applied to academic referral centers. Except as noted, conditions recorded after admission have minimal impact on comorbidity and severity measures or on Medicare reimbursement.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)781-788
Number of pages8
JournalMedical Care
Volume45
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 2007

Fingerprint

Information Storage and Retrieval
Diagnosis-Related Groups
comorbidity
grouping
Comorbidity
Safety
Patient Safety
Medicare
Inpatients
Referral and Consultation
Postoperative Hemorrhage
Hip Fractures
present
Foreign Bodies
hospitalization
Hospitalization
rehabilitation
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Pediatrics
Weights and Measures

Keywords

  • Administrative data
  • Comorbidity
  • Hospital quality
  • Quality measurement
  • Severity of illness

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Nursing(all)
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Health(social science)
  • Health Professions(all)

Cite this

Impact of diagnosis-timing indicators on measures of safety, comorbidity, and case mix groupings from administrative data sources. / Naessens, James M; Campbell, Claudia R.; Berg, Bjorn; Williams, Arthur R.; Culbertson, Richard.

In: Medical Care, Vol. 45, No. 8, 08.2007, p. 781-788.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Naessens, James M ; Campbell, Claudia R. ; Berg, Bjorn ; Williams, Arthur R. ; Culbertson, Richard. / Impact of diagnosis-timing indicators on measures of safety, comorbidity, and case mix groupings from administrative data sources. In: Medical Care. 2007 ; Vol. 45, No. 8. pp. 781-788.
@article{462dce9a45964b0c85ada8311759d8be,
title = "Impact of diagnosis-timing indicators on measures of safety, comorbidity, and case mix groupings from administrative data sources",
abstract = "Context: Many attempts to identify hospital complications rely on secondary diagnoses from billing data. To be meaningful, diagnosis codes must distinguish between diagnoses after admission and those existing before admission. Objective: To assess the influence of diagnoses at admission on patient safety, comorbidity, severity measures, and case mix groupings for Medicare reimbursement. Design: Cross-sectional association of various diagnosis-based clinical and performance measures with and without diagnosis present on admission. Setting: Hospital discharges from Mayo Clinic Rochester hospitals in 2005 (N = 60,599). Patients: All hospital inpatients including surgical, medical, pediatric, maternity, psychiatric, and rehabilitation patients. About 33{\%} of patients traveled more than 120 miles for care. Main Outcome Measures: Hospital patient safety indicators, comorbidity, severity, and case mix measures with and without diagnoses present at admission. Results: Over 90{\%} of all diagnoses were present at admission whereas 27.1{\%} of all inpatients had a secondary diagnosis coded in-hospital. About one-third of discharges with a safety indicator were flagged because of a diagnosis already present at admission, more likely among referral patients. In contrast, 87{\%} of postoperative hemorrhage, 22{\%} of postoperative hip fractures, and 54{\%} of foreign bodies left in wounds were coded as in-hospital conditions. Severity changes during hospitalization were observed, in less than 8{\%} of discharges. Slightly over 3{\%} of discharges were assigned to higher weight diagnosis-related groups based on an in-hospital complication. Conclusions: In general, many patient safety indicators do not reliably identify adverse hospital events, especially when applied to academic referral centers. Except as noted, conditions recorded after admission have minimal impact on comorbidity and severity measures or on Medicare reimbursement.",
keywords = "Administrative data, Comorbidity, Hospital quality, Quality measurement, Severity of illness",
author = "Naessens, {James M} and Campbell, {Claudia R.} and Bjorn Berg and Williams, {Arthur R.} and Richard Culbertson",
year = "2007",
month = "8",
doi = "10.1097/MLR.0b013e3180618b7f",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "45",
pages = "781--788",
journal = "Medical Care",
issn = "0025-7079",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Impact of diagnosis-timing indicators on measures of safety, comorbidity, and case mix groupings from administrative data sources

AU - Naessens, James M

AU - Campbell, Claudia R.

AU - Berg, Bjorn

AU - Williams, Arthur R.

AU - Culbertson, Richard

PY - 2007/8

Y1 - 2007/8

N2 - Context: Many attempts to identify hospital complications rely on secondary diagnoses from billing data. To be meaningful, diagnosis codes must distinguish between diagnoses after admission and those existing before admission. Objective: To assess the influence of diagnoses at admission on patient safety, comorbidity, severity measures, and case mix groupings for Medicare reimbursement. Design: Cross-sectional association of various diagnosis-based clinical and performance measures with and without diagnosis present on admission. Setting: Hospital discharges from Mayo Clinic Rochester hospitals in 2005 (N = 60,599). Patients: All hospital inpatients including surgical, medical, pediatric, maternity, psychiatric, and rehabilitation patients. About 33% of patients traveled more than 120 miles for care. Main Outcome Measures: Hospital patient safety indicators, comorbidity, severity, and case mix measures with and without diagnoses present at admission. Results: Over 90% of all diagnoses were present at admission whereas 27.1% of all inpatients had a secondary diagnosis coded in-hospital. About one-third of discharges with a safety indicator were flagged because of a diagnosis already present at admission, more likely among referral patients. In contrast, 87% of postoperative hemorrhage, 22% of postoperative hip fractures, and 54% of foreign bodies left in wounds were coded as in-hospital conditions. Severity changes during hospitalization were observed, in less than 8% of discharges. Slightly over 3% of discharges were assigned to higher weight diagnosis-related groups based on an in-hospital complication. Conclusions: In general, many patient safety indicators do not reliably identify adverse hospital events, especially when applied to academic referral centers. Except as noted, conditions recorded after admission have minimal impact on comorbidity and severity measures or on Medicare reimbursement.

AB - Context: Many attempts to identify hospital complications rely on secondary diagnoses from billing data. To be meaningful, diagnosis codes must distinguish between diagnoses after admission and those existing before admission. Objective: To assess the influence of diagnoses at admission on patient safety, comorbidity, severity measures, and case mix groupings for Medicare reimbursement. Design: Cross-sectional association of various diagnosis-based clinical and performance measures with and without diagnosis present on admission. Setting: Hospital discharges from Mayo Clinic Rochester hospitals in 2005 (N = 60,599). Patients: All hospital inpatients including surgical, medical, pediatric, maternity, psychiatric, and rehabilitation patients. About 33% of patients traveled more than 120 miles for care. Main Outcome Measures: Hospital patient safety indicators, comorbidity, severity, and case mix measures with and without diagnoses present at admission. Results: Over 90% of all diagnoses were present at admission whereas 27.1% of all inpatients had a secondary diagnosis coded in-hospital. About one-third of discharges with a safety indicator were flagged because of a diagnosis already present at admission, more likely among referral patients. In contrast, 87% of postoperative hemorrhage, 22% of postoperative hip fractures, and 54% of foreign bodies left in wounds were coded as in-hospital conditions. Severity changes during hospitalization were observed, in less than 8% of discharges. Slightly over 3% of discharges were assigned to higher weight diagnosis-related groups based on an in-hospital complication. Conclusions: In general, many patient safety indicators do not reliably identify adverse hospital events, especially when applied to academic referral centers. Except as noted, conditions recorded after admission have minimal impact on comorbidity and severity measures or on Medicare reimbursement.

KW - Administrative data

KW - Comorbidity

KW - Hospital quality

KW - Quality measurement

KW - Severity of illness

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34547571194&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34547571194&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3180618b7f

DO - 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3180618b7f

M3 - Article

C2 - 17667313

AN - SCOPUS:34547571194

VL - 45

SP - 781

EP - 788

JO - Medical Care

JF - Medical Care

SN - 0025-7079

IS - 8

ER -