Impact of a quality assessment program on radiologist performance in ultrasound-guided renal transplant biopsy

Maitray D. Patel, Rafael Miranda, Carrie J. Phillips, Scott W. Young, Patrick T. Liu, Catherine C. Roberts, C. Daniel Johnson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to analyze the impact of a quality assessment (QA) program on radiologist performance in ultrasound-guided renal transplant biopsy. Methods: The numbers of glomeruli and small arteries obtained during ultrasound-guided renal transplant biopsy of all consecutive patients performed by any of 8 radiologists in an ultrasound section between September 1, 2007, and May 31, 2010, were recorded. Procedural success was assessed using Banff 97 criteria. Two subgroups were defined on the basis of each radiologist's approximate fractional full-time equivalent effort in the section, with 2 radiologists who were engaged 100% of their clinical noncall time in the ultrasound section constituting the primary ultrasound subgroup and 6 radiologists who were engaged <25% of their clinical noncall time in the ultrasound section constituting the secondary ultrasound subgroup. The biopsy success rate for individuals, subgroups, and the entire section for 9 months before (pre-QA) and 24 months after (post-QA) the onset of quarterly dissemination of the QA data was analyzed. Results: Of 339 biopsies in the pre-QA period, 90.5% were successful. Of 1,063 biopsies in the post-QA period, 96.0% were successful (P < .001). The pre-QA individual radiologist success rates ranged between 71.4% and 96.7% (mean, 86.2 ± 10.3%). The post-QA individual radiologist success rates ranged between 80.0% and 97.9% (mean, 92.5 ± 6.6%). The primary ultrasound subgroup success rate increased from 93.4% to 97.5% (P = .005). The secondary ultrasound subgroup success rate increased from 85.7% to 93.8% (P = .004). Conclusions: A renal transplant biopsy QA program improves operator performance.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)355-359
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of the American College of Radiology
Volume8
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2011

Fingerprint

Transplants
Kidney
Biopsy
Radiologists
Arteries

Keywords

  • biopsy
  • Quality assurance
  • radiology
  • renal transplant
  • ultrasound

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

Impact of a quality assessment program on radiologist performance in ultrasound-guided renal transplant biopsy. / Patel, Maitray D.; Miranda, Rafael; Phillips, Carrie J.; Young, Scott W.; Liu, Patrick T.; Roberts, Catherine C.; Johnson, C. Daniel.

In: Journal of the American College of Radiology, Vol. 8, No. 5, 01.01.2011, p. 355-359.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Patel, Maitray D. ; Miranda, Rafael ; Phillips, Carrie J. ; Young, Scott W. ; Liu, Patrick T. ; Roberts, Catherine C. ; Johnson, C. Daniel. / Impact of a quality assessment program on radiologist performance in ultrasound-guided renal transplant biopsy. In: Journal of the American College of Radiology. 2011 ; Vol. 8, No. 5. pp. 355-359.
@article{c4e1e23a756b49f682a7c14cc71168e2,
title = "Impact of a quality assessment program on radiologist performance in ultrasound-guided renal transplant biopsy",
abstract = "Purpose: The purpose of this study was to analyze the impact of a quality assessment (QA) program on radiologist performance in ultrasound-guided renal transplant biopsy. Methods: The numbers of glomeruli and small arteries obtained during ultrasound-guided renal transplant biopsy of all consecutive patients performed by any of 8 radiologists in an ultrasound section between September 1, 2007, and May 31, 2010, were recorded. Procedural success was assessed using Banff 97 criteria. Two subgroups were defined on the basis of each radiologist's approximate fractional full-time equivalent effort in the section, with 2 radiologists who were engaged 100{\%} of their clinical noncall time in the ultrasound section constituting the primary ultrasound subgroup and 6 radiologists who were engaged <25{\%} of their clinical noncall time in the ultrasound section constituting the secondary ultrasound subgroup. The biopsy success rate for individuals, subgroups, and the entire section for 9 months before (pre-QA) and 24 months after (post-QA) the onset of quarterly dissemination of the QA data was analyzed. Results: Of 339 biopsies in the pre-QA period, 90.5{\%} were successful. Of 1,063 biopsies in the post-QA period, 96.0{\%} were successful (P < .001). The pre-QA individual radiologist success rates ranged between 71.4{\%} and 96.7{\%} (mean, 86.2 ± 10.3{\%}). The post-QA individual radiologist success rates ranged between 80.0{\%} and 97.9{\%} (mean, 92.5 ± 6.6{\%}). The primary ultrasound subgroup success rate increased from 93.4{\%} to 97.5{\%} (P = .005). The secondary ultrasound subgroup success rate increased from 85.7{\%} to 93.8{\%} (P = .004). Conclusions: A renal transplant biopsy QA program improves operator performance.",
keywords = "biopsy, Quality assurance, radiology, renal transplant, ultrasound",
author = "Patel, {Maitray D.} and Rafael Miranda and Phillips, {Carrie J.} and Young, {Scott W.} and Liu, {Patrick T.} and Roberts, {Catherine C.} and Johnson, {C. Daniel}",
year = "2011",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jacr.2010.08.014",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "8",
pages = "355--359",
journal = "JACR Journal of the American College of Radiology",
issn = "1558-349X",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Impact of a quality assessment program on radiologist performance in ultrasound-guided renal transplant biopsy

AU - Patel, Maitray D.

AU - Miranda, Rafael

AU - Phillips, Carrie J.

AU - Young, Scott W.

AU - Liu, Patrick T.

AU - Roberts, Catherine C.

AU - Johnson, C. Daniel

PY - 2011/1/1

Y1 - 2011/1/1

N2 - Purpose: The purpose of this study was to analyze the impact of a quality assessment (QA) program on radiologist performance in ultrasound-guided renal transplant biopsy. Methods: The numbers of glomeruli and small arteries obtained during ultrasound-guided renal transplant biopsy of all consecutive patients performed by any of 8 radiologists in an ultrasound section between September 1, 2007, and May 31, 2010, were recorded. Procedural success was assessed using Banff 97 criteria. Two subgroups were defined on the basis of each radiologist's approximate fractional full-time equivalent effort in the section, with 2 radiologists who were engaged 100% of their clinical noncall time in the ultrasound section constituting the primary ultrasound subgroup and 6 radiologists who were engaged <25% of their clinical noncall time in the ultrasound section constituting the secondary ultrasound subgroup. The biopsy success rate for individuals, subgroups, and the entire section for 9 months before (pre-QA) and 24 months after (post-QA) the onset of quarterly dissemination of the QA data was analyzed. Results: Of 339 biopsies in the pre-QA period, 90.5% were successful. Of 1,063 biopsies in the post-QA period, 96.0% were successful (P < .001). The pre-QA individual radiologist success rates ranged between 71.4% and 96.7% (mean, 86.2 ± 10.3%). The post-QA individual radiologist success rates ranged between 80.0% and 97.9% (mean, 92.5 ± 6.6%). The primary ultrasound subgroup success rate increased from 93.4% to 97.5% (P = .005). The secondary ultrasound subgroup success rate increased from 85.7% to 93.8% (P = .004). Conclusions: A renal transplant biopsy QA program improves operator performance.

AB - Purpose: The purpose of this study was to analyze the impact of a quality assessment (QA) program on radiologist performance in ultrasound-guided renal transplant biopsy. Methods: The numbers of glomeruli and small arteries obtained during ultrasound-guided renal transplant biopsy of all consecutive patients performed by any of 8 radiologists in an ultrasound section between September 1, 2007, and May 31, 2010, were recorded. Procedural success was assessed using Banff 97 criteria. Two subgroups were defined on the basis of each radiologist's approximate fractional full-time equivalent effort in the section, with 2 radiologists who were engaged 100% of their clinical noncall time in the ultrasound section constituting the primary ultrasound subgroup and 6 radiologists who were engaged <25% of their clinical noncall time in the ultrasound section constituting the secondary ultrasound subgroup. The biopsy success rate for individuals, subgroups, and the entire section for 9 months before (pre-QA) and 24 months after (post-QA) the onset of quarterly dissemination of the QA data was analyzed. Results: Of 339 biopsies in the pre-QA period, 90.5% were successful. Of 1,063 biopsies in the post-QA period, 96.0% were successful (P < .001). The pre-QA individual radiologist success rates ranged between 71.4% and 96.7% (mean, 86.2 ± 10.3%). The post-QA individual radiologist success rates ranged between 80.0% and 97.9% (mean, 92.5 ± 6.6%). The primary ultrasound subgroup success rate increased from 93.4% to 97.5% (P = .005). The secondary ultrasound subgroup success rate increased from 85.7% to 93.8% (P = .004). Conclusions: A renal transplant biopsy QA program improves operator performance.

KW - biopsy

KW - Quality assurance

KW - radiology

KW - renal transplant

KW - ultrasound

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84928097010&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84928097010&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jacr.2010.08.014

DO - 10.1016/j.jacr.2010.08.014

M3 - Article

VL - 8

SP - 355

EP - 359

JO - JACR Journal of the American College of Radiology

JF - JACR Journal of the American College of Radiology

SN - 1558-349X

IS - 5

ER -