Impact of a physician recommendation

Paul M. Darden, Robert M. Jacobson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

19 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

HPV vaccination has failed to achieve uptake comparable to the other adolescent-specific vaccines Gargano et al. conducted a survey of parents of adolescents in a single Georgia county and found uptake similar to national surveys. They also found among the most commonly cited reasons for receiving vaccines a recommendation from a health care provider and among the most commonly cited reasons for not getting any of the adolescent vaccines were concerns for adverse effects. Of note, they found that the recommendation for any one vaccine had a positive effect on the uptake of other vaccines. Their findings of the importance of provider recommendations matched findings from other studies of adolescent vaccines, infant vaccines, and adult vaccines. This is despite flaws in their study including a very poor response rate (effectively 4.5%) of those surveyed and in their reporting including a lack of details of survey methods. Local surveys of vaccination have much to offer the national and local discussion about immunization delivery and how delivery should be optimized, but such surveys should use standardized approaches as well as pursue more comprehensive investigations at the local level to address the nuances national complex-cluster surveys cannot.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article numberA24
Pages (from-to)2632-2635
Number of pages4
JournalHuman Vaccines and Immunotherapeutics
Volume10
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2014

Fingerprint

Vaccines
Physicians
Vaccination
Health Personnel
Surveys and Questionnaires
Immunization
Parents

Keywords

  • Adolescent
  • Adolescent health services
  • Attitude to health
  • Diphtheriatetanus vaccine
  • Immunization
  • Meningococcal vaccines
  • Papillomavirus vaccines
  • Patient acceptance of health care
  • Preventive health services
  • Tetanus toxoid
  • Treatment refusal
  • Vaccination
  • Vaccines

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Immunology and Allergy
  • Immunology
  • Pharmacology

Cite this

Darden, P. M., & Jacobson, R. M. (2014). Impact of a physician recommendation. Human Vaccines and Immunotherapeutics, 10(9), 2632-2635. [A24]. https://doi.org/10.4161/hv.29020

Impact of a physician recommendation. / Darden, Paul M.; Jacobson, Robert M.

In: Human Vaccines and Immunotherapeutics, Vol. 10, No. 9, A24, 01.09.2014, p. 2632-2635.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Darden, PM & Jacobson, RM 2014, 'Impact of a physician recommendation', Human Vaccines and Immunotherapeutics, vol. 10, no. 9, A24, pp. 2632-2635. https://doi.org/10.4161/hv.29020
Darden, Paul M. ; Jacobson, Robert M. / Impact of a physician recommendation. In: Human Vaccines and Immunotherapeutics. 2014 ; Vol. 10, No. 9. pp. 2632-2635.
@article{e86377b9e7f74333abcd66817e9605c2,
title = "Impact of a physician recommendation",
abstract = "HPV vaccination has failed to achieve uptake comparable to the other adolescent-specific vaccines Gargano et al. conducted a survey of parents of adolescents in a single Georgia county and found uptake similar to national surveys. They also found among the most commonly cited reasons for receiving vaccines a recommendation from a health care provider and among the most commonly cited reasons for not getting any of the adolescent vaccines were concerns for adverse effects. Of note, they found that the recommendation for any one vaccine had a positive effect on the uptake of other vaccines. Their findings of the importance of provider recommendations matched findings from other studies of adolescent vaccines, infant vaccines, and adult vaccines. This is despite flaws in their study including a very poor response rate (effectively 4.5{\%}) of those surveyed and in their reporting including a lack of details of survey methods. Local surveys of vaccination have much to offer the national and local discussion about immunization delivery and how delivery should be optimized, but such surveys should use standardized approaches as well as pursue more comprehensive investigations at the local level to address the nuances national complex-cluster surveys cannot.",
keywords = "Adolescent, Adolescent health services, Attitude to health, Diphtheriatetanus vaccine, Immunization, Meningococcal vaccines, Papillomavirus vaccines, Patient acceptance of health care, Preventive health services, Tetanus toxoid, Treatment refusal, Vaccination, Vaccines",
author = "Darden, {Paul M.} and Jacobson, {Robert M.}",
year = "2014",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.4161/hv.29020",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "10",
pages = "2632--2635",
journal = "Human Vaccines and Immunotherapeutics",
issn = "2164-5515",
publisher = "Landes Bioscience",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Impact of a physician recommendation

AU - Darden, Paul M.

AU - Jacobson, Robert M.

PY - 2014/9/1

Y1 - 2014/9/1

N2 - HPV vaccination has failed to achieve uptake comparable to the other adolescent-specific vaccines Gargano et al. conducted a survey of parents of adolescents in a single Georgia county and found uptake similar to national surveys. They also found among the most commonly cited reasons for receiving vaccines a recommendation from a health care provider and among the most commonly cited reasons for not getting any of the adolescent vaccines were concerns for adverse effects. Of note, they found that the recommendation for any one vaccine had a positive effect on the uptake of other vaccines. Their findings of the importance of provider recommendations matched findings from other studies of adolescent vaccines, infant vaccines, and adult vaccines. This is despite flaws in their study including a very poor response rate (effectively 4.5%) of those surveyed and in their reporting including a lack of details of survey methods. Local surveys of vaccination have much to offer the national and local discussion about immunization delivery and how delivery should be optimized, but such surveys should use standardized approaches as well as pursue more comprehensive investigations at the local level to address the nuances national complex-cluster surveys cannot.

AB - HPV vaccination has failed to achieve uptake comparable to the other adolescent-specific vaccines Gargano et al. conducted a survey of parents of adolescents in a single Georgia county and found uptake similar to national surveys. They also found among the most commonly cited reasons for receiving vaccines a recommendation from a health care provider and among the most commonly cited reasons for not getting any of the adolescent vaccines were concerns for adverse effects. Of note, they found that the recommendation for any one vaccine had a positive effect on the uptake of other vaccines. Their findings of the importance of provider recommendations matched findings from other studies of adolescent vaccines, infant vaccines, and adult vaccines. This is despite flaws in their study including a very poor response rate (effectively 4.5%) of those surveyed and in their reporting including a lack of details of survey methods. Local surveys of vaccination have much to offer the national and local discussion about immunization delivery and how delivery should be optimized, but such surveys should use standardized approaches as well as pursue more comprehensive investigations at the local level to address the nuances national complex-cluster surveys cannot.

KW - Adolescent

KW - Adolescent health services

KW - Attitude to health

KW - Diphtheriatetanus vaccine

KW - Immunization

KW - Meningococcal vaccines

KW - Papillomavirus vaccines

KW - Patient acceptance of health care

KW - Preventive health services

KW - Tetanus toxoid

KW - Treatment refusal

KW - Vaccination

KW - Vaccines

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84920118902&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84920118902&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.4161/hv.29020

DO - 10.4161/hv.29020

M3 - Article

C2 - 25483503

AN - SCOPUS:84920118902

VL - 10

SP - 2632

EP - 2635

JO - Human Vaccines and Immunotherapeutics

JF - Human Vaccines and Immunotherapeutics

SN - 2164-5515

IS - 9

M1 - A24

ER -