Impact of a Computerized Physician Order-Entry System

William M. Stone, Benn E. Smith, Judd D. Shaft, Richard D. Nelson, Samuel R. Money

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

29 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: The Institute of Medicine has urged the adoption of electronic prescribing systems in all health-care organizations by 2010. Accordingly, computerized physician order entry (CPOE) warrants detailed evaluation. Mixed results have been reported about the benefit of this system. No review of its application in surgical patients has been reported to date. We present the implementation of CPOE in the management of surgical patients within an academic multispecialty practice. Study Design: Retrospective and prospective analyses of patient-safety measures were done pre- and post-CPOE institution, respectively. Other metrics evaluated included medication errors, order-implementation times, efficiencies, personnel requirements, and physician time. Sampling of time span for the order placement process was assessed with direct hidden observation of the provider. Results: A total of 15 (0.22%) medication errors were discovered in 6,815 surgical procedures performed during the 6 months before CPOE use. After implementation, 10 medication errors were found (5,963 surgical procedures [0.16%]) in the initial 6 months and 13 (0.21%) in the second 6 months (6,106 surgical procedures) (p = NS). Mean total time from placement of order to nurse receipt before implementation was 41.2 minutes per order (2.05 minutes finding chart, 0.72 minutes writing order, 38.4 minutes for unit secretary transcription) compared with 27 seconds per order using CPOE (p < 0.01). Four additional informational technology specialists were temporarily required for assistance in implementing CPOE. After CPOE adoption, 11 of 56 (19.6%) ancillary personnel positions were eliminated related to order-entry efficiencies. Conclusions: Present CPOE technology can allow major efficiency gains, but refinements will be required for improvements in patient safety.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)960-967
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of the American College of Surgeons
Volume208
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2009

Fingerprint

Medical Order Entry Systems
Medication Errors
Patient Safety
Electronic Prescribing
Technology
National Academies of Science, Engineering, and Medicine (U.S.) Health and Medicine Division
Retrospective Studies
Nurses
Observation
Organizations

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Stone, W. M., Smith, B. E., Shaft, J. D., Nelson, R. D., & Money, S. R. (2009). Impact of a Computerized Physician Order-Entry System. Journal of the American College of Surgeons, 208(5), 960-967. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2009.01.042

Impact of a Computerized Physician Order-Entry System. / Stone, William M.; Smith, Benn E.; Shaft, Judd D.; Nelson, Richard D.; Money, Samuel R.

In: Journal of the American College of Surgeons, Vol. 208, No. 5, 05.2009, p. 960-967.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Stone, WM, Smith, BE, Shaft, JD, Nelson, RD & Money, SR 2009, 'Impact of a Computerized Physician Order-Entry System', Journal of the American College of Surgeons, vol. 208, no. 5, pp. 960-967. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2009.01.042
Stone, William M. ; Smith, Benn E. ; Shaft, Judd D. ; Nelson, Richard D. ; Money, Samuel R. / Impact of a Computerized Physician Order-Entry System. In: Journal of the American College of Surgeons. 2009 ; Vol. 208, No. 5. pp. 960-967.
@article{b000f8fc37424e478c8e90fa2f8be57f,
title = "Impact of a Computerized Physician Order-Entry System",
abstract = "Background: The Institute of Medicine has urged the adoption of electronic prescribing systems in all health-care organizations by 2010. Accordingly, computerized physician order entry (CPOE) warrants detailed evaluation. Mixed results have been reported about the benefit of this system. No review of its application in surgical patients has been reported to date. We present the implementation of CPOE in the management of surgical patients within an academic multispecialty practice. Study Design: Retrospective and prospective analyses of patient-safety measures were done pre- and post-CPOE institution, respectively. Other metrics evaluated included medication errors, order-implementation times, efficiencies, personnel requirements, and physician time. Sampling of time span for the order placement process was assessed with direct hidden observation of the provider. Results: A total of 15 (0.22{\%}) medication errors were discovered in 6,815 surgical procedures performed during the 6 months before CPOE use. After implementation, 10 medication errors were found (5,963 surgical procedures [0.16{\%}]) in the initial 6 months and 13 (0.21{\%}) in the second 6 months (6,106 surgical procedures) (p = NS). Mean total time from placement of order to nurse receipt before implementation was 41.2 minutes per order (2.05 minutes finding chart, 0.72 minutes writing order, 38.4 minutes for unit secretary transcription) compared with 27 seconds per order using CPOE (p < 0.01). Four additional informational technology specialists were temporarily required for assistance in implementing CPOE. After CPOE adoption, 11 of 56 (19.6{\%}) ancillary personnel positions were eliminated related to order-entry efficiencies. Conclusions: Present CPOE technology can allow major efficiency gains, but refinements will be required for improvements in patient safety.",
author = "Stone, {William M.} and Smith, {Benn E.} and Shaft, {Judd D.} and Nelson, {Richard D.} and Money, {Samuel R.}",
year = "2009",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2009.01.042",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "208",
pages = "960--967",
journal = "Journal of the American College of Surgeons",
issn = "1072-7515",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Impact of a Computerized Physician Order-Entry System

AU - Stone, William M.

AU - Smith, Benn E.

AU - Shaft, Judd D.

AU - Nelson, Richard D.

AU - Money, Samuel R.

PY - 2009/5

Y1 - 2009/5

N2 - Background: The Institute of Medicine has urged the adoption of electronic prescribing systems in all health-care organizations by 2010. Accordingly, computerized physician order entry (CPOE) warrants detailed evaluation. Mixed results have been reported about the benefit of this system. No review of its application in surgical patients has been reported to date. We present the implementation of CPOE in the management of surgical patients within an academic multispecialty practice. Study Design: Retrospective and prospective analyses of patient-safety measures were done pre- and post-CPOE institution, respectively. Other metrics evaluated included medication errors, order-implementation times, efficiencies, personnel requirements, and physician time. Sampling of time span for the order placement process was assessed with direct hidden observation of the provider. Results: A total of 15 (0.22%) medication errors were discovered in 6,815 surgical procedures performed during the 6 months before CPOE use. After implementation, 10 medication errors were found (5,963 surgical procedures [0.16%]) in the initial 6 months and 13 (0.21%) in the second 6 months (6,106 surgical procedures) (p = NS). Mean total time from placement of order to nurse receipt before implementation was 41.2 minutes per order (2.05 minutes finding chart, 0.72 minutes writing order, 38.4 minutes for unit secretary transcription) compared with 27 seconds per order using CPOE (p < 0.01). Four additional informational technology specialists were temporarily required for assistance in implementing CPOE. After CPOE adoption, 11 of 56 (19.6%) ancillary personnel positions were eliminated related to order-entry efficiencies. Conclusions: Present CPOE technology can allow major efficiency gains, but refinements will be required for improvements in patient safety.

AB - Background: The Institute of Medicine has urged the adoption of electronic prescribing systems in all health-care organizations by 2010. Accordingly, computerized physician order entry (CPOE) warrants detailed evaluation. Mixed results have been reported about the benefit of this system. No review of its application in surgical patients has been reported to date. We present the implementation of CPOE in the management of surgical patients within an academic multispecialty practice. Study Design: Retrospective and prospective analyses of patient-safety measures were done pre- and post-CPOE institution, respectively. Other metrics evaluated included medication errors, order-implementation times, efficiencies, personnel requirements, and physician time. Sampling of time span for the order placement process was assessed with direct hidden observation of the provider. Results: A total of 15 (0.22%) medication errors were discovered in 6,815 surgical procedures performed during the 6 months before CPOE use. After implementation, 10 medication errors were found (5,963 surgical procedures [0.16%]) in the initial 6 months and 13 (0.21%) in the second 6 months (6,106 surgical procedures) (p = NS). Mean total time from placement of order to nurse receipt before implementation was 41.2 minutes per order (2.05 minutes finding chart, 0.72 minutes writing order, 38.4 minutes for unit secretary transcription) compared with 27 seconds per order using CPOE (p < 0.01). Four additional informational technology specialists were temporarily required for assistance in implementing CPOE. After CPOE adoption, 11 of 56 (19.6%) ancillary personnel positions were eliminated related to order-entry efficiencies. Conclusions: Present CPOE technology can allow major efficiency gains, but refinements will be required for improvements in patient safety.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=65249191324&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=65249191324&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2009.01.042

DO - 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2009.01.042

M3 - Article

VL - 208

SP - 960

EP - 967

JO - Journal of the American College of Surgeons

JF - Journal of the American College of Surgeons

SN - 1072-7515

IS - 5

ER -