Imaging of soft tissue tumors

M. J. Kransdorf, J. S. Jelinek, R. P. Moser

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

92 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In summary, MR imaging is the preferred modality for the evaluation of a soft tissue mass after plain films have been taken. The radiologic appearance of certain soft tissue tumors or tumorlike processes such as myositis ossificans, benign fatty tumors, intramuscular hemangiomas, pigmented villonodular synovitis, and certain hematomas may be sufficiently unique to allow a strong presumptive radiologic diagnosis. It must be emphasized that MR cannot reliably distinguish between benign and malignant lesions, and when radiologic evaluation is nonspecific, one is ill advised to suggest a lesion is benign or malignant solely on the basis of its MR appearance. CT may be useful in specific instances for the identification of subtle soft tissue mineralization in those patients in whom lesions are not adequately evaluated by radiographs. Ultrasonography may be useful in the assessing of recurrent disease as well as in establishing tumor vascularity.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)359-372
Number of pages14
JournalRadiologic Clinics of North America
Volume31
Issue number2
StatePublished - 1993
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Pigmented Villonodular Synovitis
Myositis Ossificans
Neoplasms
Lipoma
Motion Pictures
Hemangioma
Hematoma
Ultrasonography

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology

Cite this

Kransdorf, M. J., Jelinek, J. S., & Moser, R. P. (1993). Imaging of soft tissue tumors. Radiologic Clinics of North America, 31(2), 359-372.

Imaging of soft tissue tumors. / Kransdorf, M. J.; Jelinek, J. S.; Moser, R. P.

In: Radiologic Clinics of North America, Vol. 31, No. 2, 1993, p. 359-372.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Kransdorf, MJ, Jelinek, JS & Moser, RP 1993, 'Imaging of soft tissue tumors', Radiologic Clinics of North America, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 359-372.
Kransdorf MJ, Jelinek JS, Moser RP. Imaging of soft tissue tumors. Radiologic Clinics of North America. 1993;31(2):359-372.
Kransdorf, M. J. ; Jelinek, J. S. ; Moser, R. P. / Imaging of soft tissue tumors. In: Radiologic Clinics of North America. 1993 ; Vol. 31, No. 2. pp. 359-372.
@article{d8fbc2a326e14ce7af6d21ec3ad0aa45,
title = "Imaging of soft tissue tumors",
abstract = "In summary, MR imaging is the preferred modality for the evaluation of a soft tissue mass after plain films have been taken. The radiologic appearance of certain soft tissue tumors or tumorlike processes such as myositis ossificans, benign fatty tumors, intramuscular hemangiomas, pigmented villonodular synovitis, and certain hematomas may be sufficiently unique to allow a strong presumptive radiologic diagnosis. It must be emphasized that MR cannot reliably distinguish between benign and malignant lesions, and when radiologic evaluation is nonspecific, one is ill advised to suggest a lesion is benign or malignant solely on the basis of its MR appearance. CT may be useful in specific instances for the identification of subtle soft tissue mineralization in those patients in whom lesions are not adequately evaluated by radiographs. Ultrasonography may be useful in the assessing of recurrent disease as well as in establishing tumor vascularity.",
author = "Kransdorf, {M. J.} and Jelinek, {J. S.} and Moser, {R. P.}",
year = "1993",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "31",
pages = "359--372",
journal = "Radiologic Clinics of North America",
issn = "0033-8389",
publisher = "W.B. Saunders Ltd",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Imaging of soft tissue tumors

AU - Kransdorf, M. J.

AU - Jelinek, J. S.

AU - Moser, R. P.

PY - 1993

Y1 - 1993

N2 - In summary, MR imaging is the preferred modality for the evaluation of a soft tissue mass after plain films have been taken. The radiologic appearance of certain soft tissue tumors or tumorlike processes such as myositis ossificans, benign fatty tumors, intramuscular hemangiomas, pigmented villonodular synovitis, and certain hematomas may be sufficiently unique to allow a strong presumptive radiologic diagnosis. It must be emphasized that MR cannot reliably distinguish between benign and malignant lesions, and when radiologic evaluation is nonspecific, one is ill advised to suggest a lesion is benign or malignant solely on the basis of its MR appearance. CT may be useful in specific instances for the identification of subtle soft tissue mineralization in those patients in whom lesions are not adequately evaluated by radiographs. Ultrasonography may be useful in the assessing of recurrent disease as well as in establishing tumor vascularity.

AB - In summary, MR imaging is the preferred modality for the evaluation of a soft tissue mass after plain films have been taken. The radiologic appearance of certain soft tissue tumors or tumorlike processes such as myositis ossificans, benign fatty tumors, intramuscular hemangiomas, pigmented villonodular synovitis, and certain hematomas may be sufficiently unique to allow a strong presumptive radiologic diagnosis. It must be emphasized that MR cannot reliably distinguish between benign and malignant lesions, and when radiologic evaluation is nonspecific, one is ill advised to suggest a lesion is benign or malignant solely on the basis of its MR appearance. CT may be useful in specific instances for the identification of subtle soft tissue mineralization in those patients in whom lesions are not adequately evaluated by radiographs. Ultrasonography may be useful in the assessing of recurrent disease as well as in establishing tumor vascularity.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0027478619&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0027478619&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 31

SP - 359

EP - 372

JO - Radiologic Clinics of North America

JF - Radiologic Clinics of North America

SN - 0033-8389

IS - 2

ER -