Image enhancement by noncontrast harmonic echocardiography. Part I. Qualitative assessment of endocardial visualization

Sharon L. Mulvagh, David A. Foley, Marek Belohlavek, James B. Seward

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

35 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: To determine whether harmonic imaging - use of signals with frequencies twice that of the transmitted ultrasound to produce ultrasound images - can improve endocardial border definition in patients who have technically difficult echocardiograms. Methods: We studied 29 patients with technically difficult echocardiograms (nonvisualization of 2 or more endocardial segments in a 16-segment model). Apical long-axis, four-chamber, and two-chamber images were acquired during fundamental imaging (at 2.0 and 3.5 MHz) and second harmonic imaging (3.5-MHz receive mode) in random order. Images were digitally stored and subsequently reviewed blindly for endocardial segment score (0 = not visualized; 1 = adequate; or 2 = excellent) and overall ranking of image quality (1 [best] to 3 [worst]). Results: Mean endocardial segment score was significantly better (P<0.0001) for harmonic imaging (1.02 ± 0.36) than for either fundamental mode (0.49 ± 0.21 and 0.57 ± 0.27 for the 2.0- and 3.5-MHz images, respectively). The harmonic images were ranked as better (P<0.0001) than those of either fundamental mode: harmonic mean rank was 1.07 in comparison with 2.67 and 2.26 for the 2.0 and 3.5-MHz fundamental images, respectively. Conclusion: Noncontrast harmonic imaging appreciably enhances endocardial definition in patients with technically difficult echocardiographic studies and significantly improves overall image quality.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1062-1065
Number of pages4
JournalMayo Clinic Proceedings
Volume73
Issue number11
StatePublished - 1998

Fingerprint

Image Enhancement
Echocardiography

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Image enhancement by noncontrast harmonic echocardiography. Part I. Qualitative assessment of endocardial visualization. / Mulvagh, Sharon L.; Foley, David A.; Belohlavek, Marek; Seward, James B.

In: Mayo Clinic Proceedings, Vol. 73, No. 11, 1998, p. 1062-1065.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{c99b94be01c94b1fbc6bb1672b286ff4,
title = "Image enhancement by noncontrast harmonic echocardiography. Part I. Qualitative assessment of endocardial visualization",
abstract = "Objective: To determine whether harmonic imaging - use of signals with frequencies twice that of the transmitted ultrasound to produce ultrasound images - can improve endocardial border definition in patients who have technically difficult echocardiograms. Methods: We studied 29 patients with technically difficult echocardiograms (nonvisualization of 2 or more endocardial segments in a 16-segment model). Apical long-axis, four-chamber, and two-chamber images were acquired during fundamental imaging (at 2.0 and 3.5 MHz) and second harmonic imaging (3.5-MHz receive mode) in random order. Images were digitally stored and subsequently reviewed blindly for endocardial segment score (0 = not visualized; 1 = adequate; or 2 = excellent) and overall ranking of image quality (1 [best] to 3 [worst]). Results: Mean endocardial segment score was significantly better (P<0.0001) for harmonic imaging (1.02 ± 0.36) than for either fundamental mode (0.49 ± 0.21 and 0.57 ± 0.27 for the 2.0- and 3.5-MHz images, respectively). The harmonic images were ranked as better (P<0.0001) than those of either fundamental mode: harmonic mean rank was 1.07 in comparison with 2.67 and 2.26 for the 2.0 and 3.5-MHz fundamental images, respectively. Conclusion: Noncontrast harmonic imaging appreciably enhances endocardial definition in patients with technically difficult echocardiographic studies and significantly improves overall image quality.",
author = "Mulvagh, {Sharon L.} and Foley, {David A.} and Marek Belohlavek and Seward, {James B.}",
year = "1998",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "73",
pages = "1062--1065",
journal = "Mayo Clinic Proceedings",
issn = "0025-6196",
publisher = "Elsevier Science",
number = "11",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Image enhancement by noncontrast harmonic echocardiography. Part I. Qualitative assessment of endocardial visualization

AU - Mulvagh, Sharon L.

AU - Foley, David A.

AU - Belohlavek, Marek

AU - Seward, James B.

PY - 1998

Y1 - 1998

N2 - Objective: To determine whether harmonic imaging - use of signals with frequencies twice that of the transmitted ultrasound to produce ultrasound images - can improve endocardial border definition in patients who have technically difficult echocardiograms. Methods: We studied 29 patients with technically difficult echocardiograms (nonvisualization of 2 or more endocardial segments in a 16-segment model). Apical long-axis, four-chamber, and two-chamber images were acquired during fundamental imaging (at 2.0 and 3.5 MHz) and second harmonic imaging (3.5-MHz receive mode) in random order. Images were digitally stored and subsequently reviewed blindly for endocardial segment score (0 = not visualized; 1 = adequate; or 2 = excellent) and overall ranking of image quality (1 [best] to 3 [worst]). Results: Mean endocardial segment score was significantly better (P<0.0001) for harmonic imaging (1.02 ± 0.36) than for either fundamental mode (0.49 ± 0.21 and 0.57 ± 0.27 for the 2.0- and 3.5-MHz images, respectively). The harmonic images were ranked as better (P<0.0001) than those of either fundamental mode: harmonic mean rank was 1.07 in comparison with 2.67 and 2.26 for the 2.0 and 3.5-MHz fundamental images, respectively. Conclusion: Noncontrast harmonic imaging appreciably enhances endocardial definition in patients with technically difficult echocardiographic studies and significantly improves overall image quality.

AB - Objective: To determine whether harmonic imaging - use of signals with frequencies twice that of the transmitted ultrasound to produce ultrasound images - can improve endocardial border definition in patients who have technically difficult echocardiograms. Methods: We studied 29 patients with technically difficult echocardiograms (nonvisualization of 2 or more endocardial segments in a 16-segment model). Apical long-axis, four-chamber, and two-chamber images were acquired during fundamental imaging (at 2.0 and 3.5 MHz) and second harmonic imaging (3.5-MHz receive mode) in random order. Images were digitally stored and subsequently reviewed blindly for endocardial segment score (0 = not visualized; 1 = adequate; or 2 = excellent) and overall ranking of image quality (1 [best] to 3 [worst]). Results: Mean endocardial segment score was significantly better (P<0.0001) for harmonic imaging (1.02 ± 0.36) than for either fundamental mode (0.49 ± 0.21 and 0.57 ± 0.27 for the 2.0- and 3.5-MHz images, respectively). The harmonic images were ranked as better (P<0.0001) than those of either fundamental mode: harmonic mean rank was 1.07 in comparison with 2.67 and 2.26 for the 2.0 and 3.5-MHz fundamental images, respectively. Conclusion: Noncontrast harmonic imaging appreciably enhances endocardial definition in patients with technically difficult echocardiographic studies and significantly improves overall image quality.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0031788396&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0031788396&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 73

SP - 1062

EP - 1065

JO - Mayo Clinic Proceedings

JF - Mayo Clinic Proceedings

SN - 0025-6196

IS - 11

ER -