Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis function following childbirth - An extended evaluation

Eva S. Juhasz, Basil Fozard, Roger R. Dozois, Duane M. Ilstrup, Heidi Nelson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

97 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

PURPOSE: Women undergoing Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) are frequently within reproductive years and eager to bear children. Management issues have been raised regarding the effects of pregnancy and delivery on the pouch, particularly with respect to obstetric care. Our experience is updated to search for delayed sequelae of pregnancy and delivery and to establish whether other factors have an adverse effect on pouch function. These results are also compared with the outcome of pregnancy and delivery in patients with ileostomy or Kock pouch. METHODS: Records of 43 women who had a successful pregnancy and delivery following IPAA were reviewed, including 8 women who had more than 1 pregnancy. RESULTS: Pregnancy was generally well tolerated, with complications being managed nonoperatively. Stool frequency (P<0.01), incontinence (P<0.01), and pad usage (P<0.05; sign rank test) were significantly increased during pregnancy, but prepregnancy function was restored following delivery. Vaginal delivery, multiple births, length of labor, and birth weight had no adverse permanent effect on subsequent pouch function. Longer follow-up after vaginal delivery (mean, 2.4 years) demonstrated no compromise of pouch function. CONCLUSIONS: Incidence of pouch-related complications in patients with IPAA compares favorably with incidence in patients with ileostomy or Kock pouch. Operative rate for complications was 0 percent in IPAA patients compared with 9 percent in patients with ileostomy and 19 percent in patients with Kock pouch. The cesarean section rate was higher in patients with IPAA than in those with ileostomy or Kock pouch, and this may be caused by uncertainty about how to manage delivery in patients with IPAA. Pregnancy and childbirth are well tolerated in women with IPAA, with a lower complication rate and a higher cesarean section rate than women with ileostomy or Kock pouch. Type of delivery should be influenced by obstetric considerations, with vaginal delivery avoided in patients with a noncompliant, rigid perineum.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)159-165
Number of pages7
JournalDiseases of the Colon & Rectum
Volume38
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1995

Fingerprint

Colonic Pouches
Parturition
Ileostomy
Pregnancy
Cesarean Section
Obstetrics
Multiple Birth Offspring
Perineum
Incidence
Pregnancy Outcome
Birth Weight
Uncertainty

Keywords

  • Childbirth
  • Delivery
  • Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis
  • Ileoanal anastomosis
  • Pregnancy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Gastroenterology

Cite this

Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis function following childbirth - An extended evaluation. / Juhasz, Eva S.; Fozard, Basil; Dozois, Roger R.; Ilstrup, Duane M.; Nelson, Heidi.

In: Diseases of the Colon & Rectum, Vol. 38, No. 2, 02.1995, p. 159-165.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Juhasz, Eva S. ; Fozard, Basil ; Dozois, Roger R. ; Ilstrup, Duane M. ; Nelson, Heidi. / Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis function following childbirth - An extended evaluation. In: Diseases of the Colon & Rectum. 1995 ; Vol. 38, No. 2. pp. 159-165.
@article{5d1d32706ed541c2b61cb6842bc6b80e,
title = "Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis function following childbirth - An extended evaluation",
abstract = "PURPOSE: Women undergoing Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) are frequently within reproductive years and eager to bear children. Management issues have been raised regarding the effects of pregnancy and delivery on the pouch, particularly with respect to obstetric care. Our experience is updated to search for delayed sequelae of pregnancy and delivery and to establish whether other factors have an adverse effect on pouch function. These results are also compared with the outcome of pregnancy and delivery in patients with ileostomy or Kock pouch. METHODS: Records of 43 women who had a successful pregnancy and delivery following IPAA were reviewed, including 8 women who had more than 1 pregnancy. RESULTS: Pregnancy was generally well tolerated, with complications being managed nonoperatively. Stool frequency (P<0.01), incontinence (P<0.01), and pad usage (P<0.05; sign rank test) were significantly increased during pregnancy, but prepregnancy function was restored following delivery. Vaginal delivery, multiple births, length of labor, and birth weight had no adverse permanent effect on subsequent pouch function. Longer follow-up after vaginal delivery (mean, 2.4 years) demonstrated no compromise of pouch function. CONCLUSIONS: Incidence of pouch-related complications in patients with IPAA compares favorably with incidence in patients with ileostomy or Kock pouch. Operative rate for complications was 0 percent in IPAA patients compared with 9 percent in patients with ileostomy and 19 percent in patients with Kock pouch. The cesarean section rate was higher in patients with IPAA than in those with ileostomy or Kock pouch, and this may be caused by uncertainty about how to manage delivery in patients with IPAA. Pregnancy and childbirth are well tolerated in women with IPAA, with a lower complication rate and a higher cesarean section rate than women with ileostomy or Kock pouch. Type of delivery should be influenced by obstetric considerations, with vaginal delivery avoided in patients with a noncompliant, rigid perineum.",
keywords = "Childbirth, Delivery, Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis, Ileoanal anastomosis, Pregnancy",
author = "Juhasz, {Eva S.} and Basil Fozard and Dozois, {Roger R.} and Ilstrup, {Duane M.} and Heidi Nelson",
year = "1995",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1007/BF02052444",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "38",
pages = "159--165",
journal = "Diseases of the Colon and Rectum",
issn = "0012-3706",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis function following childbirth - An extended evaluation

AU - Juhasz, Eva S.

AU - Fozard, Basil

AU - Dozois, Roger R.

AU - Ilstrup, Duane M.

AU - Nelson, Heidi

PY - 1995/2

Y1 - 1995/2

N2 - PURPOSE: Women undergoing Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) are frequently within reproductive years and eager to bear children. Management issues have been raised regarding the effects of pregnancy and delivery on the pouch, particularly with respect to obstetric care. Our experience is updated to search for delayed sequelae of pregnancy and delivery and to establish whether other factors have an adverse effect on pouch function. These results are also compared with the outcome of pregnancy and delivery in patients with ileostomy or Kock pouch. METHODS: Records of 43 women who had a successful pregnancy and delivery following IPAA were reviewed, including 8 women who had more than 1 pregnancy. RESULTS: Pregnancy was generally well tolerated, with complications being managed nonoperatively. Stool frequency (P<0.01), incontinence (P<0.01), and pad usage (P<0.05; sign rank test) were significantly increased during pregnancy, but prepregnancy function was restored following delivery. Vaginal delivery, multiple births, length of labor, and birth weight had no adverse permanent effect on subsequent pouch function. Longer follow-up after vaginal delivery (mean, 2.4 years) demonstrated no compromise of pouch function. CONCLUSIONS: Incidence of pouch-related complications in patients with IPAA compares favorably with incidence in patients with ileostomy or Kock pouch. Operative rate for complications was 0 percent in IPAA patients compared with 9 percent in patients with ileostomy and 19 percent in patients with Kock pouch. The cesarean section rate was higher in patients with IPAA than in those with ileostomy or Kock pouch, and this may be caused by uncertainty about how to manage delivery in patients with IPAA. Pregnancy and childbirth are well tolerated in women with IPAA, with a lower complication rate and a higher cesarean section rate than women with ileostomy or Kock pouch. Type of delivery should be influenced by obstetric considerations, with vaginal delivery avoided in patients with a noncompliant, rigid perineum.

AB - PURPOSE: Women undergoing Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) are frequently within reproductive years and eager to bear children. Management issues have been raised regarding the effects of pregnancy and delivery on the pouch, particularly with respect to obstetric care. Our experience is updated to search for delayed sequelae of pregnancy and delivery and to establish whether other factors have an adverse effect on pouch function. These results are also compared with the outcome of pregnancy and delivery in patients with ileostomy or Kock pouch. METHODS: Records of 43 women who had a successful pregnancy and delivery following IPAA were reviewed, including 8 women who had more than 1 pregnancy. RESULTS: Pregnancy was generally well tolerated, with complications being managed nonoperatively. Stool frequency (P<0.01), incontinence (P<0.01), and pad usage (P<0.05; sign rank test) were significantly increased during pregnancy, but prepregnancy function was restored following delivery. Vaginal delivery, multiple births, length of labor, and birth weight had no adverse permanent effect on subsequent pouch function. Longer follow-up after vaginal delivery (mean, 2.4 years) demonstrated no compromise of pouch function. CONCLUSIONS: Incidence of pouch-related complications in patients with IPAA compares favorably with incidence in patients with ileostomy or Kock pouch. Operative rate for complications was 0 percent in IPAA patients compared with 9 percent in patients with ileostomy and 19 percent in patients with Kock pouch. The cesarean section rate was higher in patients with IPAA than in those with ileostomy or Kock pouch, and this may be caused by uncertainty about how to manage delivery in patients with IPAA. Pregnancy and childbirth are well tolerated in women with IPAA, with a lower complication rate and a higher cesarean section rate than women with ileostomy or Kock pouch. Type of delivery should be influenced by obstetric considerations, with vaginal delivery avoided in patients with a noncompliant, rigid perineum.

KW - Childbirth

KW - Delivery

KW - Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis

KW - Ileoanal anastomosis

KW - Pregnancy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0028936281&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0028936281&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/BF02052444

DO - 10.1007/BF02052444

M3 - Article

C2 - 7851170

AN - SCOPUS:0028936281

VL - 38

SP - 159

EP - 165

JO - Diseases of the Colon and Rectum

JF - Diseases of the Colon and Rectum

SN - 0012-3706

IS - 2

ER -