If asked, hospitalized patients will choose whether to receive life-sustaining therapies.

Nelson Nicolasora, Rahul Pannala, Stavros Mountantonakis, Bala Shanmugam, Angela DeGirolamo, Yaw Amoateng-Adjepong, Constantine A. Manthous

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

32 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: No national policy requires health care providers to discuss with hospitalized patients whether the latter would want cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) or mechanical ventilation (MV) in the event of cardiopulmonary failure. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether hospitalized patients are willing to discuss end-of-life issues and choose whether to receive CPR and MV. DESIGN: Prospective randomized trial. PARTICIPANTS: 297 patients admitted to the medicine service of a 350-bed community teaching hospital. INTERVENTION: Patients were randomized to receive routine care or a scripted intervention, delivered by research physicians, that included detailed information about CPR, MV, and advance directives. MEASUREMENTS: Number of patients who welcomed the scripted intervention, number who chose to receive or reject CPR/MV, and number of advance directives created during hospitalization. RESULTS: Of the 297 patients studied, 136 were in the intervention group and 161 were in the control group. Baseline characteristics and severity of illness were similar in the 2 groups. Of the 136 patients in the intervention group, 133 (98%) willingly discussed CPR and mechanical ventilation, and 112 (82%) found the information useful. One hundred and twenty-five (92%) clarified their preferences regarding CPR and MV after receiving the intervention; of the 48 patients who were initially documented as wanting CPR/MV, 3 requested no CPR/MV after the intervention. Of the 87 patients in the intervention group who had no documentation of code status on admission, 5 asked for no CPR/MV. Of the 161 patients in the control group, 55 had documentation of their code status on admission. Of the 106 patients without documentation, 6 were later documented to receive no CPR/MV. Thirteen of the 102 patients who had no advance directive on admission created one after the intervention, whereas only 1 of the 128 patients in the control group did so (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Patients are willing to discuss and give informed consent for CPR and mechanical ventilation early in hospitalization. Only a minority drafted advance directives during hospitalization. Larger studies that include patients at other centers are required to determine whether these findings are reproducible and whether this approach is clinically feasible. (c) 2006 Society of Hospital Medicine.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)161-167
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of hospital medicine (Online)
Volume1
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2006
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation
Artificial Respiration
Advance Directives
Therapeutics
Documentation
Hospitalization
Control Groups
Community Hospital
Informed Consent
Teaching Hospitals
Health Personnel
Medicine
Physicians

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Nicolasora, N., Pannala, R., Mountantonakis, S., Shanmugam, B., DeGirolamo, A., Amoateng-Adjepong, Y., & Manthous, C. A. (2006). If asked, hospitalized patients will choose whether to receive life-sustaining therapies. Journal of hospital medicine (Online), 1(3), 161-167. https://doi.org/10.1002/jhm.78

If asked, hospitalized patients will choose whether to receive life-sustaining therapies. / Nicolasora, Nelson; Pannala, Rahul; Mountantonakis, Stavros; Shanmugam, Bala; DeGirolamo, Angela; Amoateng-Adjepong, Yaw; Manthous, Constantine A.

In: Journal of hospital medicine (Online), Vol. 1, No. 3, 05.2006, p. 161-167.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Nicolasora, N, Pannala, R, Mountantonakis, S, Shanmugam, B, DeGirolamo, A, Amoateng-Adjepong, Y & Manthous, CA 2006, 'If asked, hospitalized patients will choose whether to receive life-sustaining therapies.', Journal of hospital medicine (Online), vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 161-167. https://doi.org/10.1002/jhm.78
Nicolasora N, Pannala R, Mountantonakis S, Shanmugam B, DeGirolamo A, Amoateng-Adjepong Y et al. If asked, hospitalized patients will choose whether to receive life-sustaining therapies. Journal of hospital medicine (Online). 2006 May;1(3):161-167. https://doi.org/10.1002/jhm.78
Nicolasora, Nelson ; Pannala, Rahul ; Mountantonakis, Stavros ; Shanmugam, Bala ; DeGirolamo, Angela ; Amoateng-Adjepong, Yaw ; Manthous, Constantine A. / If asked, hospitalized patients will choose whether to receive life-sustaining therapies. In: Journal of hospital medicine (Online). 2006 ; Vol. 1, No. 3. pp. 161-167.
@article{63378d1b22104228988bd1181444a199,
title = "If asked, hospitalized patients will choose whether to receive life-sustaining therapies.",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: No national policy requires health care providers to discuss with hospitalized patients whether the latter would want cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) or mechanical ventilation (MV) in the event of cardiopulmonary failure. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether hospitalized patients are willing to discuss end-of-life issues and choose whether to receive CPR and MV. DESIGN: Prospective randomized trial. PARTICIPANTS: 297 patients admitted to the medicine service of a 350-bed community teaching hospital. INTERVENTION: Patients were randomized to receive routine care or a scripted intervention, delivered by research physicians, that included detailed information about CPR, MV, and advance directives. MEASUREMENTS: Number of patients who welcomed the scripted intervention, number who chose to receive or reject CPR/MV, and number of advance directives created during hospitalization. RESULTS: Of the 297 patients studied, 136 were in the intervention group and 161 were in the control group. Baseline characteristics and severity of illness were similar in the 2 groups. Of the 136 patients in the intervention group, 133 (98{\%}) willingly discussed CPR and mechanical ventilation, and 112 (82{\%}) found the information useful. One hundred and twenty-five (92{\%}) clarified their preferences regarding CPR and MV after receiving the intervention; of the 48 patients who were initially documented as wanting CPR/MV, 3 requested no CPR/MV after the intervention. Of the 87 patients in the intervention group who had no documentation of code status on admission, 5 asked for no CPR/MV. Of the 161 patients in the control group, 55 had documentation of their code status on admission. Of the 106 patients without documentation, 6 were later documented to receive no CPR/MV. Thirteen of the 102 patients who had no advance directive on admission created one after the intervention, whereas only 1 of the 128 patients in the control group did so (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Patients are willing to discuss and give informed consent for CPR and mechanical ventilation early in hospitalization. Only a minority drafted advance directives during hospitalization. Larger studies that include patients at other centers are required to determine whether these findings are reproducible and whether this approach is clinically feasible. (c) 2006 Society of Hospital Medicine.",
author = "Nelson Nicolasora and Rahul Pannala and Stavros Mountantonakis and Bala Shanmugam and Angela DeGirolamo and Yaw Amoateng-Adjepong and Manthous, {Constantine A.}",
year = "2006",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1002/jhm.78",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "1",
pages = "161--167",
journal = "Journal of Hospital Medicine",
issn = "1553-5606",
publisher = "Frontline Medical Communications",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - If asked, hospitalized patients will choose whether to receive life-sustaining therapies.

AU - Nicolasora, Nelson

AU - Pannala, Rahul

AU - Mountantonakis, Stavros

AU - Shanmugam, Bala

AU - DeGirolamo, Angela

AU - Amoateng-Adjepong, Yaw

AU - Manthous, Constantine A.

PY - 2006/5

Y1 - 2006/5

N2 - BACKGROUND: No national policy requires health care providers to discuss with hospitalized patients whether the latter would want cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) or mechanical ventilation (MV) in the event of cardiopulmonary failure. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether hospitalized patients are willing to discuss end-of-life issues and choose whether to receive CPR and MV. DESIGN: Prospective randomized trial. PARTICIPANTS: 297 patients admitted to the medicine service of a 350-bed community teaching hospital. INTERVENTION: Patients were randomized to receive routine care or a scripted intervention, delivered by research physicians, that included detailed information about CPR, MV, and advance directives. MEASUREMENTS: Number of patients who welcomed the scripted intervention, number who chose to receive or reject CPR/MV, and number of advance directives created during hospitalization. RESULTS: Of the 297 patients studied, 136 were in the intervention group and 161 were in the control group. Baseline characteristics and severity of illness were similar in the 2 groups. Of the 136 patients in the intervention group, 133 (98%) willingly discussed CPR and mechanical ventilation, and 112 (82%) found the information useful. One hundred and twenty-five (92%) clarified their preferences regarding CPR and MV after receiving the intervention; of the 48 patients who were initially documented as wanting CPR/MV, 3 requested no CPR/MV after the intervention. Of the 87 patients in the intervention group who had no documentation of code status on admission, 5 asked for no CPR/MV. Of the 161 patients in the control group, 55 had documentation of their code status on admission. Of the 106 patients without documentation, 6 were later documented to receive no CPR/MV. Thirteen of the 102 patients who had no advance directive on admission created one after the intervention, whereas only 1 of the 128 patients in the control group did so (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Patients are willing to discuss and give informed consent for CPR and mechanical ventilation early in hospitalization. Only a minority drafted advance directives during hospitalization. Larger studies that include patients at other centers are required to determine whether these findings are reproducible and whether this approach is clinically feasible. (c) 2006 Society of Hospital Medicine.

AB - BACKGROUND: No national policy requires health care providers to discuss with hospitalized patients whether the latter would want cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) or mechanical ventilation (MV) in the event of cardiopulmonary failure. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether hospitalized patients are willing to discuss end-of-life issues and choose whether to receive CPR and MV. DESIGN: Prospective randomized trial. PARTICIPANTS: 297 patients admitted to the medicine service of a 350-bed community teaching hospital. INTERVENTION: Patients were randomized to receive routine care or a scripted intervention, delivered by research physicians, that included detailed information about CPR, MV, and advance directives. MEASUREMENTS: Number of patients who welcomed the scripted intervention, number who chose to receive or reject CPR/MV, and number of advance directives created during hospitalization. RESULTS: Of the 297 patients studied, 136 were in the intervention group and 161 were in the control group. Baseline characteristics and severity of illness were similar in the 2 groups. Of the 136 patients in the intervention group, 133 (98%) willingly discussed CPR and mechanical ventilation, and 112 (82%) found the information useful. One hundred and twenty-five (92%) clarified their preferences regarding CPR and MV after receiving the intervention; of the 48 patients who were initially documented as wanting CPR/MV, 3 requested no CPR/MV after the intervention. Of the 87 patients in the intervention group who had no documentation of code status on admission, 5 asked for no CPR/MV. Of the 161 patients in the control group, 55 had documentation of their code status on admission. Of the 106 patients without documentation, 6 were later documented to receive no CPR/MV. Thirteen of the 102 patients who had no advance directive on admission created one after the intervention, whereas only 1 of the 128 patients in the control group did so (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Patients are willing to discuss and give informed consent for CPR and mechanical ventilation early in hospitalization. Only a minority drafted advance directives during hospitalization. Larger studies that include patients at other centers are required to determine whether these findings are reproducible and whether this approach is clinically feasible. (c) 2006 Society of Hospital Medicine.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33947531387&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33947531387&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/jhm.78

DO - 10.1002/jhm.78

M3 - Article

C2 - 17219490

AN - SCOPUS:33947531387

VL - 1

SP - 161

EP - 167

JO - Journal of Hospital Medicine

JF - Journal of Hospital Medicine

SN - 1553-5606

IS - 3

ER -