Identifying treatment burden as an important concept for end of life care in those with advanced heart failure

Bhautesh Jani, David Blane, Susan Browne, Victor Manuel Montori, Carl May, Nathan Shippee, Frances S. Mair

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

23 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose of review The concept of treatment burden is receiving increasing attention and this review seeks to show that treatment burden is an important issue for end-of-life care in those with advanced heart failure. Recent findings Review of the qualitative literature on patient experience of end-stage heart failure since the year 2000, including 2012, suggests that treatment burden, the work that patients have to do to manage their condition, is a readily identifiable concept in advanced heart failure. Treatment burden relates to four main areas of work, namely: coherence (sense making work) which refers to the work of developing an understanding of the illness (including its implications), treatment and management; appraisal, which refers to the work of judging, monitoring and adjusting treatments; relationship work which describes the effort put into engaging with others for support; and enacting work, that is the effort put into operationalizing treatments, which includes activities such as taking medications, attending appointments, enduring side effects of treatments and dealing with communication difficulties. Summary Treatment burden has the potential to be an important barometer of quality of care from the patient perspective in advanced heart failure.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)3-7
Number of pages5
JournalCurrent Opinion in Supportive and Palliative Care
Volume7
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2013

Fingerprint

Terminal Care
Heart Failure
Therapeutics
Sense of Coherence
Quality of Health Care
Appointments and Schedules
Communication

Keywords

  • Advanced heart failure
  • Quality of care
  • Treatment burden

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oncology
  • Medicine(all)
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine
  • Oncology(nursing)

Cite this

Identifying treatment burden as an important concept for end of life care in those with advanced heart failure. / Jani, Bhautesh; Blane, David; Browne, Susan; Montori, Victor Manuel; May, Carl; Shippee, Nathan; Mair, Frances S.

In: Current Opinion in Supportive and Palliative Care, Vol. 7, No. 1, 03.2013, p. 3-7.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Jani, Bhautesh ; Blane, David ; Browne, Susan ; Montori, Victor Manuel ; May, Carl ; Shippee, Nathan ; Mair, Frances S. / Identifying treatment burden as an important concept for end of life care in those with advanced heart failure. In: Current Opinion in Supportive and Palliative Care. 2013 ; Vol. 7, No. 1. pp. 3-7.
@article{849e3883f34242899957d92c4616848c,
title = "Identifying treatment burden as an important concept for end of life care in those with advanced heart failure",
abstract = "Purpose of review The concept of treatment burden is receiving increasing attention and this review seeks to show that treatment burden is an important issue for end-of-life care in those with advanced heart failure. Recent findings Review of the qualitative literature on patient experience of end-stage heart failure since the year 2000, including 2012, suggests that treatment burden, the work that patients have to do to manage their condition, is a readily identifiable concept in advanced heart failure. Treatment burden relates to four main areas of work, namely: coherence (sense making work) which refers to the work of developing an understanding of the illness (including its implications), treatment and management; appraisal, which refers to the work of judging, monitoring and adjusting treatments; relationship work which describes the effort put into engaging with others for support; and enacting work, that is the effort put into operationalizing treatments, which includes activities such as taking medications, attending appointments, enduring side effects of treatments and dealing with communication difficulties. Summary Treatment burden has the potential to be an important barometer of quality of care from the patient perspective in advanced heart failure.",
keywords = "Advanced heart failure, Quality of care, Treatment burden",
author = "Bhautesh Jani and David Blane and Susan Browne and Montori, {Victor Manuel} and Carl May and Nathan Shippee and Mair, {Frances S.}",
year = "2013",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1097/SPC.0b013e32835c071f",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "7",
pages = "3--7",
journal = "Current Opinion in Supportive and Palliative Care",
issn = "1751-4258",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Identifying treatment burden as an important concept for end of life care in those with advanced heart failure

AU - Jani, Bhautesh

AU - Blane, David

AU - Browne, Susan

AU - Montori, Victor Manuel

AU - May, Carl

AU - Shippee, Nathan

AU - Mair, Frances S.

PY - 2013/3

Y1 - 2013/3

N2 - Purpose of review The concept of treatment burden is receiving increasing attention and this review seeks to show that treatment burden is an important issue for end-of-life care in those with advanced heart failure. Recent findings Review of the qualitative literature on patient experience of end-stage heart failure since the year 2000, including 2012, suggests that treatment burden, the work that patients have to do to manage their condition, is a readily identifiable concept in advanced heart failure. Treatment burden relates to four main areas of work, namely: coherence (sense making work) which refers to the work of developing an understanding of the illness (including its implications), treatment and management; appraisal, which refers to the work of judging, monitoring and adjusting treatments; relationship work which describes the effort put into engaging with others for support; and enacting work, that is the effort put into operationalizing treatments, which includes activities such as taking medications, attending appointments, enduring side effects of treatments and dealing with communication difficulties. Summary Treatment burden has the potential to be an important barometer of quality of care from the patient perspective in advanced heart failure.

AB - Purpose of review The concept of treatment burden is receiving increasing attention and this review seeks to show that treatment burden is an important issue for end-of-life care in those with advanced heart failure. Recent findings Review of the qualitative literature on patient experience of end-stage heart failure since the year 2000, including 2012, suggests that treatment burden, the work that patients have to do to manage their condition, is a readily identifiable concept in advanced heart failure. Treatment burden relates to four main areas of work, namely: coherence (sense making work) which refers to the work of developing an understanding of the illness (including its implications), treatment and management; appraisal, which refers to the work of judging, monitoring and adjusting treatments; relationship work which describes the effort put into engaging with others for support; and enacting work, that is the effort put into operationalizing treatments, which includes activities such as taking medications, attending appointments, enduring side effects of treatments and dealing with communication difficulties. Summary Treatment burden has the potential to be an important barometer of quality of care from the patient perspective in advanced heart failure.

KW - Advanced heart failure

KW - Quality of care

KW - Treatment burden

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84877940314&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84877940314&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/SPC.0b013e32835c071f

DO - 10.1097/SPC.0b013e32835c071f

M3 - Article

C2 - 23196381

AN - SCOPUS:84877940314

VL - 7

SP - 3

EP - 7

JO - Current Opinion in Supportive and Palliative Care

JF - Current Opinion in Supportive and Palliative Care

SN - 1751-4258

IS - 1

ER -