Identifying the barriers and challenges to voting by residents in nursing homes and assisted living settings

Jason Karlawish, Richard J. Bonnie, Paul Appelbaum, Rosalie A. Kane, Constantine Lyketsos, Pamela S. Karlan, Bryan M. James, Charles Sabatino, Thomas Lawrence, David S Knopman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

16 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

To ascertain the need for and to inform development of guidelines for voting in long-term care settings, we conducted a telephone survey of Philadelphia nursing (n = 31) and assisted living (n = 20) settings following the 2003 election. Substantial variability existed in procedures used for registration and voting, in staff attitudes, and in the estimated proportion of residents who voted (29% ± 28, range 0-100%). Residents who wanted to vote were unable to do so at nearly one-third of sites, largely due to procedural problems. Nearly two-thirds of facilities indicated they assessed residents' voting capacity before the election. However, methods differed and may have disenfranchised residents who were actually competent to vote. Current procedures in many facilities fail to protect voting rights. These data suggest that rights might be better protected if election officials took charge of registration, filing absentee ballot requests, ballot completion, and trained LTC facility staff on voters' rights and reasonable accommodations.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)65-79
Number of pages15
JournalJournal of Aging and Social Policy
Volume20
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 2008

Fingerprint

assisted living
Politics
nursing home
Nursing Homes
voting
election
resident
Attitude of Health Personnel
voter
Civil Rights
Long-Term Care
staff
Telephone
Nursing
Guidelines
accommodation
telephone
nursing
rights
registration

Keywords

  • Assisted living
  • Long-term care
  • Voting rights

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Geography, Planning and Development

Cite this

Identifying the barriers and challenges to voting by residents in nursing homes and assisted living settings. / Karlawish, Jason; Bonnie, Richard J.; Appelbaum, Paul; Kane, Rosalie A.; Lyketsos, Constantine; Karlan, Pamela S.; James, Bryan M.; Sabatino, Charles; Lawrence, Thomas; Knopman, David S.

In: Journal of Aging and Social Policy, Vol. 20, No. 1, 2008, p. 65-79.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Karlawish, J, Bonnie, RJ, Appelbaum, P, Kane, RA, Lyketsos, C, Karlan, PS, James, BM, Sabatino, C, Lawrence, T & Knopman, DS 2008, 'Identifying the barriers and challenges to voting by residents in nursing homes and assisted living settings', Journal of Aging and Social Policy, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 65-79. https://doi.org/10.1300/J031v20n01_04
Karlawish, Jason ; Bonnie, Richard J. ; Appelbaum, Paul ; Kane, Rosalie A. ; Lyketsos, Constantine ; Karlan, Pamela S. ; James, Bryan M. ; Sabatino, Charles ; Lawrence, Thomas ; Knopman, David S. / Identifying the barriers and challenges to voting by residents in nursing homes and assisted living settings. In: Journal of Aging and Social Policy. 2008 ; Vol. 20, No. 1. pp. 65-79.
@article{c47dc1f2483b4e66a13485c28e43ce27,
title = "Identifying the barriers and challenges to voting by residents in nursing homes and assisted living settings",
abstract = "To ascertain the need for and to inform development of guidelines for voting in long-term care settings, we conducted a telephone survey of Philadelphia nursing (n = 31) and assisted living (n = 20) settings following the 2003 election. Substantial variability existed in procedures used for registration and voting, in staff attitudes, and in the estimated proportion of residents who voted (29{\%} ± 28, range 0-100{\%}). Residents who wanted to vote were unable to do so at nearly one-third of sites, largely due to procedural problems. Nearly two-thirds of facilities indicated they assessed residents' voting capacity before the election. However, methods differed and may have disenfranchised residents who were actually competent to vote. Current procedures in many facilities fail to protect voting rights. These data suggest that rights might be better protected if election officials took charge of registration, filing absentee ballot requests, ballot completion, and trained LTC facility staff on voters' rights and reasonable accommodations.",
keywords = "Assisted living, Long-term care, Voting rights",
author = "Jason Karlawish and Bonnie, {Richard J.} and Paul Appelbaum and Kane, {Rosalie A.} and Constantine Lyketsos and Karlan, {Pamela S.} and James, {Bryan M.} and Charles Sabatino and Thomas Lawrence and Knopman, {David S}",
year = "2008",
doi = "10.1300/J031v20n01_04",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "20",
pages = "65--79",
journal = "Journal of Aging and Social Policy",
issn = "0895-9420",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Identifying the barriers and challenges to voting by residents in nursing homes and assisted living settings

AU - Karlawish, Jason

AU - Bonnie, Richard J.

AU - Appelbaum, Paul

AU - Kane, Rosalie A.

AU - Lyketsos, Constantine

AU - Karlan, Pamela S.

AU - James, Bryan M.

AU - Sabatino, Charles

AU - Lawrence, Thomas

AU - Knopman, David S

PY - 2008

Y1 - 2008

N2 - To ascertain the need for and to inform development of guidelines for voting in long-term care settings, we conducted a telephone survey of Philadelphia nursing (n = 31) and assisted living (n = 20) settings following the 2003 election. Substantial variability existed in procedures used for registration and voting, in staff attitudes, and in the estimated proportion of residents who voted (29% ± 28, range 0-100%). Residents who wanted to vote were unable to do so at nearly one-third of sites, largely due to procedural problems. Nearly two-thirds of facilities indicated they assessed residents' voting capacity before the election. However, methods differed and may have disenfranchised residents who were actually competent to vote. Current procedures in many facilities fail to protect voting rights. These data suggest that rights might be better protected if election officials took charge of registration, filing absentee ballot requests, ballot completion, and trained LTC facility staff on voters' rights and reasonable accommodations.

AB - To ascertain the need for and to inform development of guidelines for voting in long-term care settings, we conducted a telephone survey of Philadelphia nursing (n = 31) and assisted living (n = 20) settings following the 2003 election. Substantial variability existed in procedures used for registration and voting, in staff attitudes, and in the estimated proportion of residents who voted (29% ± 28, range 0-100%). Residents who wanted to vote were unable to do so at nearly one-third of sites, largely due to procedural problems. Nearly two-thirds of facilities indicated they assessed residents' voting capacity before the election. However, methods differed and may have disenfranchised residents who were actually competent to vote. Current procedures in many facilities fail to protect voting rights. These data suggest that rights might be better protected if election officials took charge of registration, filing absentee ballot requests, ballot completion, and trained LTC facility staff on voters' rights and reasonable accommodations.

KW - Assisted living

KW - Long-term care

KW - Voting rights

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=38549145367&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=38549145367&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1300/J031v20n01_04

DO - 10.1300/J031v20n01_04

M3 - Article

C2 - 18198160

AN - SCOPUS:38549145367

VL - 20

SP - 65

EP - 79

JO - Journal of Aging and Social Policy

JF - Journal of Aging and Social Policy

SN - 0895-9420

IS - 1

ER -