ICCE consensus for celiac disease

C. Cellier; P. H.R. Green; P. Collin; Joseph Murray

doi:10.1055/s-2005-870310

ICCE consensus for celiac disease

C. Cellier, P. H.R. Green, P. Collin, Joseph Murray

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

85 Scopus citations

Abstract

The Celiac Disease Consensus Group considered that there was adequate evidence to support the use of capsule endoscopy as a prognostic test in patients who have treated and previously confirmed celiac disease who develop alarm symptoms. We also consider that capsule endoscopy may have a future role as an initial diagnostic test for confirming atrophy in patients who are positive for tissue transglutaminase or endomysial antibodies. Capsule endoscopy could at present be used as an alternative to biopsy in selected patients who are unwilling or unable to undergo EGD for confirmation of villous atrophy.

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	1055-1059
Number of pages	5
Journal	Endoscopy
Volume	37
Issue number	10
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2005-870310
State	Published - Oct 2005

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Gastroenterology

Access to Document

10.1055/s-2005-870310

Cite this

@article{56a42615e93f49eea65e29ddcb08d43d,

title = "ICCE consensus for celiac disease",

abstract = "The Celiac Disease Consensus Group considered that there was adequate evidence to support the use of capsule endoscopy as a prognostic test in patients who have treated and previously confirmed celiac disease who develop alarm symptoms. We also consider that capsule endoscopy may have a future role as an initial diagnostic test for confirming atrophy in patients who are positive for tissue transglutaminase or endomysial antibodies. Capsule endoscopy could at present be used as an alternative to biopsy in selected patients who are unwilling or unable to undergo EGD for confirmation of villous atrophy.",

author = "C. Cellier and Green, {P. H.R.} and P. Collin and Joseph Murray",

year = "2005",

month = oct,

doi = "10.1055/s-2005-870310",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "37",

pages = "1055--1059",

journal = "Endoscopy",

issn = "0013-726X",

publisher = "Georg Thieme Verlag",

number = "10",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - ICCE consensus for celiac disease

AU - Cellier, C.

AU - Green, P. H.R.

AU - Collin, P.

AU - Murray, Joseph

PY - 2005/10

Y1 - 2005/10

N2 - The Celiac Disease Consensus Group considered that there was adequate evidence to support the use of capsule endoscopy as a prognostic test in patients who have treated and previously confirmed celiac disease who develop alarm symptoms. We also consider that capsule endoscopy may have a future role as an initial diagnostic test for confirming atrophy in patients who are positive for tissue transglutaminase or endomysial antibodies. Capsule endoscopy could at present be used as an alternative to biopsy in selected patients who are unwilling or unable to undergo EGD for confirmation of villous atrophy.

AB - The Celiac Disease Consensus Group considered that there was adequate evidence to support the use of capsule endoscopy as a prognostic test in patients who have treated and previously confirmed celiac disease who develop alarm symptoms. We also consider that capsule endoscopy may have a future role as an initial diagnostic test for confirming atrophy in patients who are positive for tissue transglutaminase or endomysial antibodies. Capsule endoscopy could at present be used as an alternative to biopsy in selected patients who are unwilling or unable to undergo EGD for confirmation of villous atrophy.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=27144542376&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=27144542376&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1055/s-2005-870310

DO - 10.1055/s-2005-870310

M3 - Article

C2 - 16189790

AN - SCOPUS:27144542376

SN - 0013-726X

VL - 37

SP - 1055

EP - 1059

JO - Endoscopy

JF - Endoscopy

IS - 10

ER -

ICCE consensus for celiac disease

Abstract

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this