Hypereosinophilic syndromes. Established and new treatment options

Joseph H. Butterfield

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Knowledge of the cause(s) of the hypereosinophilic syndromes (HES) would greatly improve treatment options. Although it is unlikely that all patients with the HES will respond equally well to the same treatment, the use of curiently available agents to lower the total eosinophil count to <109/L can be lifesaving. Until recently, treatment of HES has been modelled after that of other haematological disorders by using combinations of various cytotoxiapproach has led to the development of the current standard regimens of therapy. With improved understanding of the effects of corticosteroids and interferon-α (IFNα) on eosinophilopoiesis and on the actions of eosinophil-active cytokines, a new plateau has been reached where agents are targeted specifically to defeat uncontrolled eosinophilopoiesis. We now consider IFNα a first line agent for new HES patients as well as for controlling eosinophilia resistant to conventional therapy. IFNα as a single agent is effective for long term control of HES. Most patients respond to a dosage of 2 to 9 MU/day. Frequently, the dosage can be lowered after eosinophilia has been controlled. Sudden discontinuation of IFNα has resulted in recurrence of eosinophilia within weeks. If a suboptimal response occurs, prednisone or hydroxycarbamide (hydroxyurea) can be added. Resistance to IFNα may indicate development of a myeloproliferative or lymphoproliferative state or of eosinophilic leukaemia. As a new option for drug-resistant HES, allogeneic bone marrow transplantation should be considered. Although the number of patients is still small, within the past several years durable responses have been reported. Treatment of the cardiovascular sequelae of HES remains a therapeutic challenge. Improved cardiac surgery techniques have allowed many patients to benefit from ventricular decortication and valve replacement. It is important to combine control of eosinophilia with any operative intervention in HES because of the danger of recurrent disease if eosinophilia remains unchecked. Long term anticoagulation is probably indicated in patients with evident cardiac thrombus or peripheral vascular emboli; however, whether HES patients should routinely receive anticoagulants and whether continued anticoagulation should be given after eosinophilia has been controlled remain unanswered questions.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)341-355
Number of pages15
JournalBioDrugs
Volume7
Issue number5
StatePublished - 1997

Fingerprint

Hypereosinophilic Syndrome
Eosinophilia
Interferons
Therapeutics
Eosinophils
Hydroxyurea
Homologous Transplantation
Prednisone
Embolism
Bone Marrow Transplantation
Anticoagulants
Thoracic Surgery
Blood Vessels
Adrenal Cortex Hormones
Thrombosis
Cytokines

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Immunology and Allergy
  • Pharmacology (medical)
  • Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics(all)

Cite this

Hypereosinophilic syndromes. Established and new treatment options. / Butterfield, Joseph H.

In: BioDrugs, Vol. 7, No. 5, 1997, p. 341-355.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Butterfield, JH 1997, 'Hypereosinophilic syndromes. Established and new treatment options', BioDrugs, vol. 7, no. 5, pp. 341-355.
Butterfield, Joseph H. / Hypereosinophilic syndromes. Established and new treatment options. In: BioDrugs. 1997 ; Vol. 7, No. 5. pp. 341-355.
@article{66983b4106a144e3aa028c858a4abaaf,
title = "Hypereosinophilic syndromes. Established and new treatment options",
abstract = "Knowledge of the cause(s) of the hypereosinophilic syndromes (HES) would greatly improve treatment options. Although it is unlikely that all patients with the HES will respond equally well to the same treatment, the use of curiently available agents to lower the total eosinophil count to <109/L can be lifesaving. Until recently, treatment of HES has been modelled after that of other haematological disorders by using combinations of various cytotoxiapproach has led to the development of the current standard regimens of therapy. With improved understanding of the effects of corticosteroids and interferon-α (IFNα) on eosinophilopoiesis and on the actions of eosinophil-active cytokines, a new plateau has been reached where agents are targeted specifically to defeat uncontrolled eosinophilopoiesis. We now consider IFNα a first line agent for new HES patients as well as for controlling eosinophilia resistant to conventional therapy. IFNα as a single agent is effective for long term control of HES. Most patients respond to a dosage of 2 to 9 MU/day. Frequently, the dosage can be lowered after eosinophilia has been controlled. Sudden discontinuation of IFNα has resulted in recurrence of eosinophilia within weeks. If a suboptimal response occurs, prednisone or hydroxycarbamide (hydroxyurea) can be added. Resistance to IFNα may indicate development of a myeloproliferative or lymphoproliferative state or of eosinophilic leukaemia. As a new option for drug-resistant HES, allogeneic bone marrow transplantation should be considered. Although the number of patients is still small, within the past several years durable responses have been reported. Treatment of the cardiovascular sequelae of HES remains a therapeutic challenge. Improved cardiac surgery techniques have allowed many patients to benefit from ventricular decortication and valve replacement. It is important to combine control of eosinophilia with any operative intervention in HES because of the danger of recurrent disease if eosinophilia remains unchecked. Long term anticoagulation is probably indicated in patients with evident cardiac thrombus or peripheral vascular emboli; however, whether HES patients should routinely receive anticoagulants and whether continued anticoagulation should be given after eosinophilia has been controlled remain unanswered questions.",
author = "Butterfield, {Joseph H.}",
year = "1997",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "7",
pages = "341--355",
journal = "BioDrugs",
issn = "1173-8804",
publisher = "Adis International Ltd",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Hypereosinophilic syndromes. Established and new treatment options

AU - Butterfield, Joseph H.

PY - 1997

Y1 - 1997

N2 - Knowledge of the cause(s) of the hypereosinophilic syndromes (HES) would greatly improve treatment options. Although it is unlikely that all patients with the HES will respond equally well to the same treatment, the use of curiently available agents to lower the total eosinophil count to <109/L can be lifesaving. Until recently, treatment of HES has been modelled after that of other haematological disorders by using combinations of various cytotoxiapproach has led to the development of the current standard regimens of therapy. With improved understanding of the effects of corticosteroids and interferon-α (IFNα) on eosinophilopoiesis and on the actions of eosinophil-active cytokines, a new plateau has been reached where agents are targeted specifically to defeat uncontrolled eosinophilopoiesis. We now consider IFNα a first line agent for new HES patients as well as for controlling eosinophilia resistant to conventional therapy. IFNα as a single agent is effective for long term control of HES. Most patients respond to a dosage of 2 to 9 MU/day. Frequently, the dosage can be lowered after eosinophilia has been controlled. Sudden discontinuation of IFNα has resulted in recurrence of eosinophilia within weeks. If a suboptimal response occurs, prednisone or hydroxycarbamide (hydroxyurea) can be added. Resistance to IFNα may indicate development of a myeloproliferative or lymphoproliferative state or of eosinophilic leukaemia. As a new option for drug-resistant HES, allogeneic bone marrow transplantation should be considered. Although the number of patients is still small, within the past several years durable responses have been reported. Treatment of the cardiovascular sequelae of HES remains a therapeutic challenge. Improved cardiac surgery techniques have allowed many patients to benefit from ventricular decortication and valve replacement. It is important to combine control of eosinophilia with any operative intervention in HES because of the danger of recurrent disease if eosinophilia remains unchecked. Long term anticoagulation is probably indicated in patients with evident cardiac thrombus or peripheral vascular emboli; however, whether HES patients should routinely receive anticoagulants and whether continued anticoagulation should be given after eosinophilia has been controlled remain unanswered questions.

AB - Knowledge of the cause(s) of the hypereosinophilic syndromes (HES) would greatly improve treatment options. Although it is unlikely that all patients with the HES will respond equally well to the same treatment, the use of curiently available agents to lower the total eosinophil count to <109/L can be lifesaving. Until recently, treatment of HES has been modelled after that of other haematological disorders by using combinations of various cytotoxiapproach has led to the development of the current standard regimens of therapy. With improved understanding of the effects of corticosteroids and interferon-α (IFNα) on eosinophilopoiesis and on the actions of eosinophil-active cytokines, a new plateau has been reached where agents are targeted specifically to defeat uncontrolled eosinophilopoiesis. We now consider IFNα a first line agent for new HES patients as well as for controlling eosinophilia resistant to conventional therapy. IFNα as a single agent is effective for long term control of HES. Most patients respond to a dosage of 2 to 9 MU/day. Frequently, the dosage can be lowered after eosinophilia has been controlled. Sudden discontinuation of IFNα has resulted in recurrence of eosinophilia within weeks. If a suboptimal response occurs, prednisone or hydroxycarbamide (hydroxyurea) can be added. Resistance to IFNα may indicate development of a myeloproliferative or lymphoproliferative state or of eosinophilic leukaemia. As a new option for drug-resistant HES, allogeneic bone marrow transplantation should be considered. Although the number of patients is still small, within the past several years durable responses have been reported. Treatment of the cardiovascular sequelae of HES remains a therapeutic challenge. Improved cardiac surgery techniques have allowed many patients to benefit from ventricular decortication and valve replacement. It is important to combine control of eosinophilia with any operative intervention in HES because of the danger of recurrent disease if eosinophilia remains unchecked. Long term anticoagulation is probably indicated in patients with evident cardiac thrombus or peripheral vascular emboli; however, whether HES patients should routinely receive anticoagulants and whether continued anticoagulation should be given after eosinophilia has been controlled remain unanswered questions.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0030756057&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0030756057&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 7

SP - 341

EP - 355

JO - BioDrugs

JF - BioDrugs

SN - 1173-8804

IS - 5

ER -