HydroCoils reduce recurrence rates in recently ruptured medium-sized intracranial aneurysms: A subgroup analysis of the HELPS trial

Waleed Brinjikji, P. M. White, H. Nahser, J. Wardlaw, R. Sellar, H. J. Cloft, David F Kallmes

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Scopus citations


BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The HydroCoil Endovascular Aneurysm Occlusion and Packing Study (HELPS) was a randomized, controlled trial comparing HydroCoils with bare-platinum coils. The purpose of this study was to perform a subgroup analysis of angiographic and clinical outcomes of medium-sized aneurysms in the HELPS trial. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with medium-sized aneurysms (5-9.9 mm) were selected from the HELPS trial. Outcomes compared between the HydroCoil and bare-platinum groups included the following: 1) any recurrence, 2) major recurrence, 3) retreatment, and 4) mRS score of ≤2. Subgroup analysis by rupture status was performed. Multivariate logistic regression analysis adjusting for aneurysm neck size, shape, use of adjunctive device, and rupture status was performed. RESULTS: Two hundred eighty-eight patients with medium-sized aneurysms were randomized (144 in each group). At 15-18 months posttreatment, the major recurrence rate was significantly lower in the HydroCoil group than in controls (18.6% versus 30.8%, P = .03, respectively). For patients with recently ruptured aneurysms, the major recurrence rate was significantly lower for the HydroCoil group than for controls (20.3% versus 47.5%, P = .003), while rates were similar between groups for unruptured aneurysms (16.7% versus 14.8%, P = .80). Multivariate analysis of patients with recently ruptured aneurysms demonstrated a lower odds of major recurrence with HydroCoils (OR = 0.27; 95% CI, 0.12-0.58; P = .0007). No difference in retreatment rates or mRS of ≤2 was seen between groups. CONCLUSIONS: HydroCoils were associated with statistically significant and clinically relevant lower rates of major recurrence for recently ruptured, medium-sized aneurysms in the HELPS trial. Because this was not a prespecified subgroup analysis, these results should not alter clinical practice but, rather, provide insight into the design of future clinical trials comparing bare platinum with second-generation coils.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1136-1141
Number of pages6
JournalAmerican Journal of Neuroradiology
Issue number6
StatePublished - Jun 1 2015


ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Neurology
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this