How to Distinguish Correlation From Causation in Orthopaedic Research

Isabella Zaniletti, Dirk R. Larson, David G. Lewallen, Daniel J. Berry, Hilal Maradit Kremers

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

Abstract

Correlations in observational studies are commonly misinterpreted as causation. Although correlation is necessary to establish a causal relationship between two variables, correlations may also arise due to chance, reverse causality, or confounding. There are several methods available to orthopaedic researchers to determine whether the observed correlations are causal. These methods depend on the key components of the study including, but not limited to, study design and data availability on confounders. In this article, we illustrate the main concepts surrounding correlation and causation using intuitive real-world examples from the orthopaedic literature. Please visit the following https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WW7pFudZbHA&t=52s for a video that explains the highlights of the paper in practical terms.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalJournal of Arthroplasty
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - 2022

Keywords

  • arthroplasty
  • causation
  • chance
  • confounding
  • correlation
  • orthopaedics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'How to Distinguish Correlation From Causation in Orthopaedic Research'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this