TY - JOUR
T1 - How Low to Go With Lipid-Lowering Therapies in a Cost-effective and Prudent Manner
AU - Cardoso, Rhanderson
AU - Blumenthal, Roger S.
AU - Kopecky, Stephen
AU - Lopez-Jimenez, Francisco
AU - Martin, Seth S.
N1 - Funding Information:
Potential Competing Interests: Dr Martin has received personal fees for serving on scientific advisory boards for Amgen Inc, Sanofi/Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc, Quest Diagnostics Incorporated, and Akcea Therapeutics, as well as grants/research support from the PJ Schafer Cardiovascular Research Fund, the David and June Trone Family Foundation, American Heart Association, Aetna Foundation, Maryland Innovation Initiative, Nokia, Google, and Apple Inc, outside the submitted work; in addition, he has patent applications pending. Dr Kopecky has received consulting fees from Prime Therapeutics LLC and grant research support from True Health. The other authors report no competing interests.
Funding Information:
Potential Competing Interests: Dr Martin has received personal fees for serving on scientific advisory boards for Amgen Inc, Sanofi/Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc, Quest Diagnostics Incorporated, and Akcea Therapeutics, as well as grants/research support from the PJ Schafer Cardiovascular Research Fund, the David and June Trone Family Foundation, American Heart Association, Aetna Foundation, Maryland Innovation Initiative, Nokia, Google, and Apple Inc, outside the submitted work; in addition, he has patent applications pending. Dr Kopecky has received consulting fees from Prime Therapeutics LLC and grant research support from True Health. The other authors report no competing interests.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research
Copyright:
Copyright 2019 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2019/4
Y1 - 2019/4
N2 - The 2013 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guideline on the treatment of blood cholesterol was a landmark document guiding health care professionals around the globe on how to administer lipid-lowering therapies. Those guidelines were primarily focused on statin therapy benefit groups. The writing committee found insufficient evidence for specific low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) treatment targets. There have been many important updates in the lipid literature since the publication of that document. Most importantly, clinical trials have provided definitive evidence for the pivotal role of LDL-C in atherogenesis and the improvement in clinical outcomes by means of aggressive LDL-C reduction. Ezetimibe, evolocumab, and alirocumab treatment resulted in substantial reductions in major adverse cardiovascular outcomes. These data encourage a discussion on whether LDL-C targets are warranted in primary and/or secondary prevention, and if so, how low should those targets be. In order to answer such questions, the costs and safety of such therapies, as well as the safety of very low levels of LDL-C need to be addressed. This review discusses the relationship between LDL-C lowering and cardiovascular risk reduction, the efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness of high-intensity lipid-lowering therapies, and the recommendations from the most recent lipid guidelines.
AB - The 2013 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guideline on the treatment of blood cholesterol was a landmark document guiding health care professionals around the globe on how to administer lipid-lowering therapies. Those guidelines were primarily focused on statin therapy benefit groups. The writing committee found insufficient evidence for specific low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) treatment targets. There have been many important updates in the lipid literature since the publication of that document. Most importantly, clinical trials have provided definitive evidence for the pivotal role of LDL-C in atherogenesis and the improvement in clinical outcomes by means of aggressive LDL-C reduction. Ezetimibe, evolocumab, and alirocumab treatment resulted in substantial reductions in major adverse cardiovascular outcomes. These data encourage a discussion on whether LDL-C targets are warranted in primary and/or secondary prevention, and if so, how low should those targets be. In order to answer such questions, the costs and safety of such therapies, as well as the safety of very low levels of LDL-C need to be addressed. This review discusses the relationship between LDL-C lowering and cardiovascular risk reduction, the efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness of high-intensity lipid-lowering therapies, and the recommendations from the most recent lipid guidelines.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85061029899&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85061029899&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.mayocp.2018.08.011
DO - 10.1016/j.mayocp.2018.08.011
M3 - Review article
C2 - 30737057
AN - SCOPUS:85061029899
SN - 0025-6196
VL - 94
SP - 660
EP - 669
JO - Mayo Clinic Proceedings
JF - Mayo Clinic Proceedings
IS - 4
ER -