How Do We Balance the Long-term Health of a Patient With the Short-term Risk to the Physician?

Michael B. Weinstock, Amal Mattu, Erik P. Hess

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background: There is a wide variation in practice patterns among emergency medicine physicians; many factors weigh into the medical decision-making process including the health of the patient as well as short-term risk to the physician. Objective: The objective of our discussion is to illustrate specific scenarios where medical decisions are focused on the physician's short-term risk, then to propose an approach to shifting the balance to the patient's long-term health. Methods: Using recent data on the evaluation, disposition, and outcomes of patients with low-risk chest pain in the emergency department, we calculate the risk of outpatient evaluation compared to the common practice of admission or observation. Results: Patients with low-risk chest pain and negative initial evaluation in the emergency department with 2 normal cardiac biomarkers, normal vital signs, and non-ischemic, interpretable ECGs, have an extremely low-risk of a short term clinically relevant adverse cardiac event. There is a suggestion of a higher patient risk from admission, prompting consideration that continued evaluation of the chest pain as an outpatient may be safer than admission or observation. Conclusion: A test/intervention should be done if the risk of a missed diagnosis or adverse outcome is greater that the risk of the test/intervention. Involving the patient in the decision-making process may help to shift the management balance from the physician's short-term concern of their own risk, to the patient's long-term health.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalJournal of Emergency Medicine
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - 2017

Fingerprint

Physicians
Health
Chest Pain
Hospital Emergency Service
Outpatients
Observation
Vital Signs
Emergency Medicine
Patient Admission
Decision Making
Electrocardiography
Biomarkers

Keywords

  • Chest pain
  • Medical decision making
  • Risk to patient
  • Shared decision making

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Emergency Medicine

Cite this

How Do We Balance the Long-term Health of a Patient With the Short-term Risk to the Physician? / Weinstock, Michael B.; Mattu, Amal; Hess, Erik P.

In: Journal of Emergency Medicine, 2017.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{cda9484490ee404b927a0a5fd9873b5b,
title = "How Do We Balance the Long-term Health of a Patient With the Short-term Risk to the Physician?",
abstract = "Background: There is a wide variation in practice patterns among emergency medicine physicians; many factors weigh into the medical decision-making process including the health of the patient as well as short-term risk to the physician. Objective: The objective of our discussion is to illustrate specific scenarios where medical decisions are focused on the physician's short-term risk, then to propose an approach to shifting the balance to the patient's long-term health. Methods: Using recent data on the evaluation, disposition, and outcomes of patients with low-risk chest pain in the emergency department, we calculate the risk of outpatient evaluation compared to the common practice of admission or observation. Results: Patients with low-risk chest pain and negative initial evaluation in the emergency department with 2 normal cardiac biomarkers, normal vital signs, and non-ischemic, interpretable ECGs, have an extremely low-risk of a short term clinically relevant adverse cardiac event. There is a suggestion of a higher patient risk from admission, prompting consideration that continued evaluation of the chest pain as an outpatient may be safer than admission or observation. Conclusion: A test/intervention should be done if the risk of a missed diagnosis or adverse outcome is greater that the risk of the test/intervention. Involving the patient in the decision-making process may help to shift the management balance from the physician's short-term concern of their own risk, to the patient's long-term health.",
keywords = "Chest pain, Medical decision making, Risk to patient, Shared decision making",
author = "Weinstock, {Michael B.} and Amal Mattu and Hess, {Erik P.}",
year = "2017",
doi = "10.1016/j.jemermed.2017.06.010",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Journal of Emergency Medicine",
issn = "0736-4679",
publisher = "Elsevier USA",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - How Do We Balance the Long-term Health of a Patient With the Short-term Risk to the Physician?

AU - Weinstock, Michael B.

AU - Mattu, Amal

AU - Hess, Erik P.

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - Background: There is a wide variation in practice patterns among emergency medicine physicians; many factors weigh into the medical decision-making process including the health of the patient as well as short-term risk to the physician. Objective: The objective of our discussion is to illustrate specific scenarios where medical decisions are focused on the physician's short-term risk, then to propose an approach to shifting the balance to the patient's long-term health. Methods: Using recent data on the evaluation, disposition, and outcomes of patients with low-risk chest pain in the emergency department, we calculate the risk of outpatient evaluation compared to the common practice of admission or observation. Results: Patients with low-risk chest pain and negative initial evaluation in the emergency department with 2 normal cardiac biomarkers, normal vital signs, and non-ischemic, interpretable ECGs, have an extremely low-risk of a short term clinically relevant adverse cardiac event. There is a suggestion of a higher patient risk from admission, prompting consideration that continued evaluation of the chest pain as an outpatient may be safer than admission or observation. Conclusion: A test/intervention should be done if the risk of a missed diagnosis or adverse outcome is greater that the risk of the test/intervention. Involving the patient in the decision-making process may help to shift the management balance from the physician's short-term concern of their own risk, to the patient's long-term health.

AB - Background: There is a wide variation in practice patterns among emergency medicine physicians; many factors weigh into the medical decision-making process including the health of the patient as well as short-term risk to the physician. Objective: The objective of our discussion is to illustrate specific scenarios where medical decisions are focused on the physician's short-term risk, then to propose an approach to shifting the balance to the patient's long-term health. Methods: Using recent data on the evaluation, disposition, and outcomes of patients with low-risk chest pain in the emergency department, we calculate the risk of outpatient evaluation compared to the common practice of admission or observation. Results: Patients with low-risk chest pain and negative initial evaluation in the emergency department with 2 normal cardiac biomarkers, normal vital signs, and non-ischemic, interpretable ECGs, have an extremely low-risk of a short term clinically relevant adverse cardiac event. There is a suggestion of a higher patient risk from admission, prompting consideration that continued evaluation of the chest pain as an outpatient may be safer than admission or observation. Conclusion: A test/intervention should be done if the risk of a missed diagnosis or adverse outcome is greater that the risk of the test/intervention. Involving the patient in the decision-making process may help to shift the management balance from the physician's short-term concern of their own risk, to the patient's long-term health.

KW - Chest pain

KW - Medical decision making

KW - Risk to patient

KW - Shared decision making

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85028595631&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85028595631&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jemermed.2017.06.010

DO - 10.1016/j.jemermed.2017.06.010

M3 - Article

JO - Journal of Emergency Medicine

JF - Journal of Emergency Medicine

SN - 0736-4679

ER -