Hospital fall prevention: A systematic review of implementation, components, adherence, and effectiveness

Susanne Hempel, Sydne Newberry, Zhen Wang, Marika Booth, Roberta Shanman, Breanne Johnsen, Victoria Shier, Debra Saliba, William D. Spector, David A. Ganz

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

83 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objectives To systematically document the implementation, components, comparators, adherence, and effectiveness of published fall prevention approaches in U.S. acute care hospitals. Design Systematic review. Studies were identified through existing reviews, searching five electronic databases, screening reference lists, and contacting topic experts for studies published through August 2011. Setting U.S. acute care hospitals. Participants Studies reporting in-hospital falls for intervention groups and concurrent (e.g., controlled trials) or historic comparators (e.g., before-after studies). Intervention Fall prevention interventions. Measurements Incidence rate ratios (IRR, ratio of fall rate postintervention or treatment group to the fall rate preintervention or control group) and ratings of study details. Results Fifty-nine studies met inclusion criteria. Implementation strategies were sparsely documented (17% not at all) and included staff education, establishing committees, seeking leadership support, and occasionally continuous quality improvement techniques. Most interventions (81%) included multiple components (e.g., risk assessments (often not validated), visual risk alerts, patient education, care rounds, bed-exit alarms, and postfall evaluations). Fifty-four percent did not report on fall prevention measures applied in the comparison group, and 39% neither reported fidelity data nor described adherence strategies such as regular audits and feedback to ensure completion of care processes. Only 45% of concurrent and 15% of historic control studies reported sufficient data to compare fall rates. The pooled postintervention incidence rate ratio (IRR) was 0.77 (95% confidence interval = 0.52-1.12, P =.17; eight studies; I2: 94%). Meta-regressions showed no systematic association between implementation intensity, intervention complexity, comparator information, or adherence levels and IRR. Conclusion Promising approaches exist, but better reporting of outcomes, implementation, adherence, intervention components, and comparison group information is necessary to establish evidence on how hospitals can successfully prevent falls.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)483-494
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of the American Geriatrics Society
Volume61
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2013
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • fall prevention
  • hospital
  • implementation
  • systematic review

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Geriatrics and Gerontology

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Hospital fall prevention: A systematic review of implementation, components, adherence, and effectiveness'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this

    Hempel, S., Newberry, S., Wang, Z., Booth, M., Shanman, R., Johnsen, B., Shier, V., Saliba, D., Spector, W. D., & Ganz, D. A. (2013). Hospital fall prevention: A systematic review of implementation, components, adherence, and effectiveness. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 61(4), 483-494. https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.12169