TY - JOUR
T1 - Histologic Outcomes With Vedolizumab Versus Adalimumab in Ulcerative Colitis
T2 - Results From An Efficacy and Safety Study of Vedolizumab Intravenous Compared to Adalimumab Subcutaneous in Participants With Ulcerative Colitis (VARSITY)
AU - Peyrin-Biroulet, Laurent
AU - Loftus, Edward V.
AU - Colombel, Jean Frédéric
AU - Danese, Silvio
AU - Rogers, Raquel
AU - Bornstein, Jeffrey D.
AU - Chen, Jingjing
AU - Schreiber, Stefan
AU - Sands, Bruce E.
AU - Lirio, Richard A.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 The Authors
PY - 2021/10
Y1 - 2021/10
N2 - Background and Aims: VARSITY (An Efficacy and Safety Study of Vedolizumab Intravenous [IV] Compared to Adalimumab Subcutaneous [SC] in Participants With Ulcerative Colitis) showed superior clinical remission and endoscopic improvement in ulcerative colitis with vedolizumab vs adalimumab. This analysis compared histologic outcomes. Methods: Patients in VARSITY were randomized 1:1 to maintenance with vedolizumab IV 300 mg every 8 weeks or adalimumab SC 40 mg every 2 weeks (both following standard induction). Geboes Index and Robarts Histopathology Index (RHI) scores were used to assess prespecified histologic exploratory end points of histologic remission (Geboes <2 or RHI ≤2) and minimal histologic disease activity (Geboes ≤3.1 or RHI ≤4) at weeks 14 and 52. Results: In total, 769 patients received vedolizumab (n = 383) or adalimumab (n = 386). Mean baseline histologic disease activity was similar between vedolizumab and adalimumab groups. Vedolizumab induced greater histologic remission than adalimumab at week 14 (Geboes: 16.7% vs 7.3%, Δ9.4% [95% confidence interval {CI}, 4.9%–13.9%], P <.0001; RHI: 25.6% vs 16.1%, Δ9.5% [95% CI, 3.8%–15.2%], P =.0011) and week 52 (Geboes: 29.2% vs 8.3%, Δ20.9% [95% CI, 15.6%–26.2%], P <.0001; RHI: 37.6% vs 19.9%, Δ17.6% [95% CI, 11.3%–23.8%], P <.0001) overall and in both anti–tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-naïve and -failure subgroups. Results were similar for minimal histologic disease activity. Histologic outcomes were generally better in anti–TNF-naïve vs -failure patients. At week 52, rates of mucosal healing (composite end point of histologic plus endoscopic improvement) were also higher with vedolizumab than adalimumab (Geboes: 25.6% vs 6.7%; RHI: 30.5% vs 14.5%). Conclusions: Higher rates of histologic remission, minimal histologic disease activity, and combined histologic plus endoscopic outcomes were observed with vedolizumab than with adalimumab in ulcerative colitis in both anti–TNF-naïve and -failure subgroups. Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov
AB - Background and Aims: VARSITY (An Efficacy and Safety Study of Vedolizumab Intravenous [IV] Compared to Adalimumab Subcutaneous [SC] in Participants With Ulcerative Colitis) showed superior clinical remission and endoscopic improvement in ulcerative colitis with vedolizumab vs adalimumab. This analysis compared histologic outcomes. Methods: Patients in VARSITY were randomized 1:1 to maintenance with vedolizumab IV 300 mg every 8 weeks or adalimumab SC 40 mg every 2 weeks (both following standard induction). Geboes Index and Robarts Histopathology Index (RHI) scores were used to assess prespecified histologic exploratory end points of histologic remission (Geboes <2 or RHI ≤2) and minimal histologic disease activity (Geboes ≤3.1 or RHI ≤4) at weeks 14 and 52. Results: In total, 769 patients received vedolizumab (n = 383) or adalimumab (n = 386). Mean baseline histologic disease activity was similar between vedolizumab and adalimumab groups. Vedolizumab induced greater histologic remission than adalimumab at week 14 (Geboes: 16.7% vs 7.3%, Δ9.4% [95% confidence interval {CI}, 4.9%–13.9%], P <.0001; RHI: 25.6% vs 16.1%, Δ9.5% [95% CI, 3.8%–15.2%], P =.0011) and week 52 (Geboes: 29.2% vs 8.3%, Δ20.9% [95% CI, 15.6%–26.2%], P <.0001; RHI: 37.6% vs 19.9%, Δ17.6% [95% CI, 11.3%–23.8%], P <.0001) overall and in both anti–tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-naïve and -failure subgroups. Results were similar for minimal histologic disease activity. Histologic outcomes were generally better in anti–TNF-naïve vs -failure patients. At week 52, rates of mucosal healing (composite end point of histologic plus endoscopic improvement) were also higher with vedolizumab than adalimumab (Geboes: 25.6% vs 6.7%; RHI: 30.5% vs 14.5%). Conclusions: Higher rates of histologic remission, minimal histologic disease activity, and combined histologic plus endoscopic outcomes were observed with vedolizumab than with adalimumab in ulcerative colitis in both anti–TNF-naïve and -failure subgroups. Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov
KW - Endoscopic Improvement
KW - Histologic Remission
KW - Rapid Onset
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85111539399&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85111539399&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1053/j.gastro.2021.06.015
DO - 10.1053/j.gastro.2021.06.015
M3 - Article
C2 - 34144047
AN - SCOPUS:85111539399
SN - 0016-5085
VL - 161
SP - 1156-1167.e3
JO - Gastroenterology
JF - Gastroenterology
IS - 4
ER -