High-resolution intracranial and cervical MRA at 3.0T

Technical considerations and initial experience

Matthew A Bernstein, John III Huston, Chen Lin, Gordon F. Gibbs, Joel P. Felmlee

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

182 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Initial experience with intracranial and cervical MRA at 3.0T is reported. Phantom measurements (corrected for relaxation effects) show S/N (3.0T) = 2.14 ± 0.08 × S/N (1.5T) in identical-geometry head coils. A 3.0T 3DTOF intracranial imaging protocol with higher-order autoshimming was developed and compared to 1.5T 3DTOF in 12 patients with aneurysms. A comparison by two radiologists showed the 3.0T to be significantly better (P < 0.001) for visualization of the aneurysms. The feasibility of cervical and intracranial contrast enhanced MR angiography (CEMRA) at 3.0T is also examined. The relaxivity of the gadolinium contrast agent decreases by only about 4-7% when the field strength is increased from 1.5 to 3.0T. Cervical 3.0T CEMRA was obtained in eight patients, two of whom had 1.5T studies available for direct comparison. Image comparison suggests 3.0T to be a favorable field strength for cervical CEMRA. Voxel volumes of 0.62-0.73 mm3 (not including zero-filling) were readily achieved at 3.0T with the use of a single-channel transmit-receive head or cervical coil, a 25 mL bolus of gadoteridol, and a 3D pulse sequence with a 66% sampling efficiency. This spatial resolution allowed visualization of intracranial aneurysms, carotid dissections, and atherosclerotic disease including ulcerations. Potential drawbacks of 3.0T MRA are increased SAR and T* 2dephasing compared to 1.5T. Image comparison suggests signal loss due to T* 2dephasing will not be substantially more problematic than at 1.5T. The dependence of RF power deposition on TR for CEMRA is calculated and discussed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)955-962
Number of pages8
JournalMagnetic Resonance in Medicine
Volume46
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - 2001

Fingerprint

Angiography
Aneurysm
Head
Carotid Artery Diseases
Gadolinium
Intracranial Aneurysm
Contrast Media
Dissection

Keywords

  • 3T
  • Contrast enhanced MRA
  • High field

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology

Cite this

High-resolution intracranial and cervical MRA at 3.0T : Technical considerations and initial experience. / Bernstein, Matthew A; Huston, John III; Lin, Chen; Gibbs, Gordon F.; Felmlee, Joel P.

In: Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, Vol. 46, No. 5, 2001, p. 955-962.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{872981ad731848c08576905285175533,
title = "High-resolution intracranial and cervical MRA at 3.0T: Technical considerations and initial experience",
abstract = "Initial experience with intracranial and cervical MRA at 3.0T is reported. Phantom measurements (corrected for relaxation effects) show S/N (3.0T) = 2.14 ± 0.08 × S/N (1.5T) in identical-geometry head coils. A 3.0T 3DTOF intracranial imaging protocol with higher-order autoshimming was developed and compared to 1.5T 3DTOF in 12 patients with aneurysms. A comparison by two radiologists showed the 3.0T to be significantly better (P < 0.001) for visualization of the aneurysms. The feasibility of cervical and intracranial contrast enhanced MR angiography (CEMRA) at 3.0T is also examined. The relaxivity of the gadolinium contrast agent decreases by only about 4-7{\%} when the field strength is increased from 1.5 to 3.0T. Cervical 3.0T CEMRA was obtained in eight patients, two of whom had 1.5T studies available for direct comparison. Image comparison suggests 3.0T to be a favorable field strength for cervical CEMRA. Voxel volumes of 0.62-0.73 mm3 (not including zero-filling) were readily achieved at 3.0T with the use of a single-channel transmit-receive head or cervical coil, a 25 mL bolus of gadoteridol, and a 3D pulse sequence with a 66{\%} sampling efficiency. This spatial resolution allowed visualization of intracranial aneurysms, carotid dissections, and atherosclerotic disease including ulcerations. Potential drawbacks of 3.0T MRA are increased SAR and T* 2dephasing compared to 1.5T. Image comparison suggests signal loss due to T* 2dephasing will not be substantially more problematic than at 1.5T. The dependence of RF power deposition on TR for CEMRA is calculated and discussed.",
keywords = "3T, Contrast enhanced MRA, High field",
author = "Bernstein, {Matthew A} and Huston, {John III} and Chen Lin and Gibbs, {Gordon F.} and Felmlee, {Joel P.}",
year = "2001",
doi = "10.1002/mrm.1282",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "46",
pages = "955--962",
journal = "Magnetic Resonance in Medicine",
issn = "0740-3194",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Inc.",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - High-resolution intracranial and cervical MRA at 3.0T

T2 - Technical considerations and initial experience

AU - Bernstein, Matthew A

AU - Huston, John III

AU - Lin, Chen

AU - Gibbs, Gordon F.

AU - Felmlee, Joel P.

PY - 2001

Y1 - 2001

N2 - Initial experience with intracranial and cervical MRA at 3.0T is reported. Phantom measurements (corrected for relaxation effects) show S/N (3.0T) = 2.14 ± 0.08 × S/N (1.5T) in identical-geometry head coils. A 3.0T 3DTOF intracranial imaging protocol with higher-order autoshimming was developed and compared to 1.5T 3DTOF in 12 patients with aneurysms. A comparison by two radiologists showed the 3.0T to be significantly better (P < 0.001) for visualization of the aneurysms. The feasibility of cervical and intracranial contrast enhanced MR angiography (CEMRA) at 3.0T is also examined. The relaxivity of the gadolinium contrast agent decreases by only about 4-7% when the field strength is increased from 1.5 to 3.0T. Cervical 3.0T CEMRA was obtained in eight patients, two of whom had 1.5T studies available for direct comparison. Image comparison suggests 3.0T to be a favorable field strength for cervical CEMRA. Voxel volumes of 0.62-0.73 mm3 (not including zero-filling) were readily achieved at 3.0T with the use of a single-channel transmit-receive head or cervical coil, a 25 mL bolus of gadoteridol, and a 3D pulse sequence with a 66% sampling efficiency. This spatial resolution allowed visualization of intracranial aneurysms, carotid dissections, and atherosclerotic disease including ulcerations. Potential drawbacks of 3.0T MRA are increased SAR and T* 2dephasing compared to 1.5T. Image comparison suggests signal loss due to T* 2dephasing will not be substantially more problematic than at 1.5T. The dependence of RF power deposition on TR for CEMRA is calculated and discussed.

AB - Initial experience with intracranial and cervical MRA at 3.0T is reported. Phantom measurements (corrected for relaxation effects) show S/N (3.0T) = 2.14 ± 0.08 × S/N (1.5T) in identical-geometry head coils. A 3.0T 3DTOF intracranial imaging protocol with higher-order autoshimming was developed and compared to 1.5T 3DTOF in 12 patients with aneurysms. A comparison by two radiologists showed the 3.0T to be significantly better (P < 0.001) for visualization of the aneurysms. The feasibility of cervical and intracranial contrast enhanced MR angiography (CEMRA) at 3.0T is also examined. The relaxivity of the gadolinium contrast agent decreases by only about 4-7% when the field strength is increased from 1.5 to 3.0T. Cervical 3.0T CEMRA was obtained in eight patients, two of whom had 1.5T studies available for direct comparison. Image comparison suggests 3.0T to be a favorable field strength for cervical CEMRA. Voxel volumes of 0.62-0.73 mm3 (not including zero-filling) were readily achieved at 3.0T with the use of a single-channel transmit-receive head or cervical coil, a 25 mL bolus of gadoteridol, and a 3D pulse sequence with a 66% sampling efficiency. This spatial resolution allowed visualization of intracranial aneurysms, carotid dissections, and atherosclerotic disease including ulcerations. Potential drawbacks of 3.0T MRA are increased SAR and T* 2dephasing compared to 1.5T. Image comparison suggests signal loss due to T* 2dephasing will not be substantially more problematic than at 1.5T. The dependence of RF power deposition on TR for CEMRA is calculated and discussed.

KW - 3T

KW - Contrast enhanced MRA

KW - High field

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0034752732&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0034752732&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/mrm.1282

DO - 10.1002/mrm.1282

M3 - Article

VL - 46

SP - 955

EP - 962

JO - Magnetic Resonance in Medicine

JF - Magnetic Resonance in Medicine

SN - 0740-3194

IS - 5

ER -