Helical (spiral) CT angiography for identification of crossing vessels at the ureteropelvic junction

Shawn P. Quillin, James A. Brink, Jay Heiken, Cary L. Siegel, Bruce L. McClennan, Ralph V. Clayman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

70 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to determine the feasibility of imaging crossing vessels at the ureteropelvic junction (uPJ) with helical (spiral) CT angiography for planning surgical repair of symptomatic UPJ obstruction. SUBJECTS AND METHODS. Twenty-four consecutive patients with symptomatic UPJ obstruction were imaged with dual-phase, contrast-enhanced helical CT (collimarion, 3 mm; pitch, 1.3-1.7; reconstruction interval, 2 mm; early phase, 20-42 sec; and delayed phase, 90-112 sec after initiation of IV contrast material injection [125 ml of ioversol containing 320 mg of iodine per ml, delivered at 4-5 ml/sec]). All imaging data were viewed interactively on an imaging workstation. Prospective on-line interpretations were correlated with subsequent surgical and clinical findings at laperoscopy (n = 3), open surgical repair (n = 2), or ureteronephroscopic endopyelotomy (n = 11). Vessels at the UPJ that were 2 mm or more in diameter were believed to be significant. Review of the transaxial images was performed to determine qualitatively the relative usefulness of the early versus the delayed phases for distinguishing arteries from veins. Multiplanar reformations also were retrospectively reviewed and compared with direct pyelograms to determine the accuracy with which the location of the UPJ and the proximal ureteral course were depicted with helical CT. RESULTS. Eleven of 24 (46%) patients collectively had 11 anterior and three posterior vessels (≥2 mm in diameter) crossing the UPJ on helical CT. Distinction between arteries and veins was significantly better on early-phase than on delayed-phase images (p = .01). Visualization of the UPJ and the proximal ureteral course was good or excellent for 18 (78%) of 23 patients for whom pyelograms were available, regardless of the presence of a ureteral stent (p > .05). Laparoscopy and open surgery findings were in agreement with the helical CT angiograms for five of five patients. Uncomplicated endopyelotomy was performed for 11 patients in whom no significant vessels were seen posterior or posterolateral to the UPJ. CONCLUSION. Helical CT angiography can depict vessels crossing the UPJ and is valuable in planning surgical management.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1125-1130
Number of pages6
JournalAmerican Journal of Roentgenology
Volume166
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1996
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Spiral Computed Tomography
ioversol
Urography
Veins
Arteries
Computed Tomography Angiography
Iodine
Laparoscopy
Contrast Media
Stents
Angiography
Injections

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

Helical (spiral) CT angiography for identification of crossing vessels at the ureteropelvic junction. / Quillin, Shawn P.; Brink, James A.; Heiken, Jay; Siegel, Cary L.; McClennan, Bruce L.; Clayman, Ralph V.

In: American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol. 166, No. 5, 01.01.1996, p. 1125-1130.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Quillin, Shawn P. ; Brink, James A. ; Heiken, Jay ; Siegel, Cary L. ; McClennan, Bruce L. ; Clayman, Ralph V. / Helical (spiral) CT angiography for identification of crossing vessels at the ureteropelvic junction. In: American Journal of Roentgenology. 1996 ; Vol. 166, No. 5. pp. 1125-1130.
@article{cde5b73b0fd346deac5ed077ca11bb76,
title = "Helical (spiral) CT angiography for identification of crossing vessels at the ureteropelvic junction",
abstract = "OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to determine the feasibility of imaging crossing vessels at the ureteropelvic junction (uPJ) with helical (spiral) CT angiography for planning surgical repair of symptomatic UPJ obstruction. SUBJECTS AND METHODS. Twenty-four consecutive patients with symptomatic UPJ obstruction were imaged with dual-phase, contrast-enhanced helical CT (collimarion, 3 mm; pitch, 1.3-1.7; reconstruction interval, 2 mm; early phase, 20-42 sec; and delayed phase, 90-112 sec after initiation of IV contrast material injection [125 ml of ioversol containing 320 mg of iodine per ml, delivered at 4-5 ml/sec]). All imaging data were viewed interactively on an imaging workstation. Prospective on-line interpretations were correlated with subsequent surgical and clinical findings at laperoscopy (n = 3), open surgical repair (n = 2), or ureteronephroscopic endopyelotomy (n = 11). Vessels at the UPJ that were 2 mm or more in diameter were believed to be significant. Review of the transaxial images was performed to determine qualitatively the relative usefulness of the early versus the delayed phases for distinguishing arteries from veins. Multiplanar reformations also were retrospectively reviewed and compared with direct pyelograms to determine the accuracy with which the location of the UPJ and the proximal ureteral course were depicted with helical CT. RESULTS. Eleven of 24 (46{\%}) patients collectively had 11 anterior and three posterior vessels (≥2 mm in diameter) crossing the UPJ on helical CT. Distinction between arteries and veins was significantly better on early-phase than on delayed-phase images (p = .01). Visualization of the UPJ and the proximal ureteral course was good or excellent for 18 (78{\%}) of 23 patients for whom pyelograms were available, regardless of the presence of a ureteral stent (p > .05). Laparoscopy and open surgery findings were in agreement with the helical CT angiograms for five of five patients. Uncomplicated endopyelotomy was performed for 11 patients in whom no significant vessels were seen posterior or posterolateral to the UPJ. CONCLUSION. Helical CT angiography can depict vessels crossing the UPJ and is valuable in planning surgical management.",
author = "Quillin, {Shawn P.} and Brink, {James A.} and Jay Heiken and Siegel, {Cary L.} and McClennan, {Bruce L.} and Clayman, {Ralph V.}",
year = "1996",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.2214/ajr.166.5.8615256",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "166",
pages = "1125--1130",
journal = "American Journal of Roentgenology",
issn = "0361-803X",
publisher = "American Roentgen Ray Society",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Helical (spiral) CT angiography for identification of crossing vessels at the ureteropelvic junction

AU - Quillin, Shawn P.

AU - Brink, James A.

AU - Heiken, Jay

AU - Siegel, Cary L.

AU - McClennan, Bruce L.

AU - Clayman, Ralph V.

PY - 1996/1/1

Y1 - 1996/1/1

N2 - OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to determine the feasibility of imaging crossing vessels at the ureteropelvic junction (uPJ) with helical (spiral) CT angiography for planning surgical repair of symptomatic UPJ obstruction. SUBJECTS AND METHODS. Twenty-four consecutive patients with symptomatic UPJ obstruction were imaged with dual-phase, contrast-enhanced helical CT (collimarion, 3 mm; pitch, 1.3-1.7; reconstruction interval, 2 mm; early phase, 20-42 sec; and delayed phase, 90-112 sec after initiation of IV contrast material injection [125 ml of ioversol containing 320 mg of iodine per ml, delivered at 4-5 ml/sec]). All imaging data were viewed interactively on an imaging workstation. Prospective on-line interpretations were correlated with subsequent surgical and clinical findings at laperoscopy (n = 3), open surgical repair (n = 2), or ureteronephroscopic endopyelotomy (n = 11). Vessels at the UPJ that were 2 mm or more in diameter were believed to be significant. Review of the transaxial images was performed to determine qualitatively the relative usefulness of the early versus the delayed phases for distinguishing arteries from veins. Multiplanar reformations also were retrospectively reviewed and compared with direct pyelograms to determine the accuracy with which the location of the UPJ and the proximal ureteral course were depicted with helical CT. RESULTS. Eleven of 24 (46%) patients collectively had 11 anterior and three posterior vessels (≥2 mm in diameter) crossing the UPJ on helical CT. Distinction between arteries and veins was significantly better on early-phase than on delayed-phase images (p = .01). Visualization of the UPJ and the proximal ureteral course was good or excellent for 18 (78%) of 23 patients for whom pyelograms were available, regardless of the presence of a ureteral stent (p > .05). Laparoscopy and open surgery findings were in agreement with the helical CT angiograms for five of five patients. Uncomplicated endopyelotomy was performed for 11 patients in whom no significant vessels were seen posterior or posterolateral to the UPJ. CONCLUSION. Helical CT angiography can depict vessels crossing the UPJ and is valuable in planning surgical management.

AB - OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to determine the feasibility of imaging crossing vessels at the ureteropelvic junction (uPJ) with helical (spiral) CT angiography for planning surgical repair of symptomatic UPJ obstruction. SUBJECTS AND METHODS. Twenty-four consecutive patients with symptomatic UPJ obstruction were imaged with dual-phase, contrast-enhanced helical CT (collimarion, 3 mm; pitch, 1.3-1.7; reconstruction interval, 2 mm; early phase, 20-42 sec; and delayed phase, 90-112 sec after initiation of IV contrast material injection [125 ml of ioversol containing 320 mg of iodine per ml, delivered at 4-5 ml/sec]). All imaging data were viewed interactively on an imaging workstation. Prospective on-line interpretations were correlated with subsequent surgical and clinical findings at laperoscopy (n = 3), open surgical repair (n = 2), or ureteronephroscopic endopyelotomy (n = 11). Vessels at the UPJ that were 2 mm or more in diameter were believed to be significant. Review of the transaxial images was performed to determine qualitatively the relative usefulness of the early versus the delayed phases for distinguishing arteries from veins. Multiplanar reformations also were retrospectively reviewed and compared with direct pyelograms to determine the accuracy with which the location of the UPJ and the proximal ureteral course were depicted with helical CT. RESULTS. Eleven of 24 (46%) patients collectively had 11 anterior and three posterior vessels (≥2 mm in diameter) crossing the UPJ on helical CT. Distinction between arteries and veins was significantly better on early-phase than on delayed-phase images (p = .01). Visualization of the UPJ and the proximal ureteral course was good or excellent for 18 (78%) of 23 patients for whom pyelograms were available, regardless of the presence of a ureteral stent (p > .05). Laparoscopy and open surgery findings were in agreement with the helical CT angiograms for five of five patients. Uncomplicated endopyelotomy was performed for 11 patients in whom no significant vessels were seen posterior or posterolateral to the UPJ. CONCLUSION. Helical CT angiography can depict vessels crossing the UPJ and is valuable in planning surgical management.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0029964610&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0029964610&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2214/ajr.166.5.8615256

DO - 10.2214/ajr.166.5.8615256

M3 - Article

C2 - 8615256

AN - SCOPUS:0029964610

VL - 166

SP - 1125

EP - 1130

JO - American Journal of Roentgenology

JF - American Journal of Roentgenology

SN - 0361-803X

IS - 5

ER -