Heart failure performance measures: Eligibility and implementation in the community

Cecilia Berardi, Alanna M. Chamberlain, Francesca Bursi, Margaret M. Redfield, Sheila M. McNallan, Susan A. Weston, Ruoxiang Jiang, Véronique L. Roger

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review


Background The goal of heart failure (HF) performance measures is to improve quality of care by assessing the implementation of guidelines in eligible patients. Little is known about the proportion of eligible patients and how performance measures are implemented in the community. Methods We determined the eligibility for and adherence to performance measures and β-blocker therapy in a community-based cohort of hospitalized HF patients from January 2005 to June 2011. Results All of the 465 HF inpatients (median age 76 years, 48% men) included in the study received an ejection fraction assessment. Only 164 had an ejection fraction <40% thus were candidates for β-blocker and angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) therapy. Considering absolute contraindications, 99 patients were eligible to receive ACE inhibitors/ARB, and 162 to receive β-blockers. Among these, 85% received ACE inhibitors/ARBs and 91% received β-blockers. Among the 261 individuals with atrial fibrillation, 89 were eligible for warfarin and 54% received it. Of 52 current smokers, 69% received cessation counseling during hospitalization. Conclusion In the community, among eligible hospitalized HF patients, the implementation of performance measures can be improved. However, as most patients are not candidates for current performance measures, other approaches are needed to improve care and outcomes.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)76-82
Number of pages7
JournalAmerican heart journal
Issue number1
StatePublished - Jul 2013

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine


Dive into the research topics of 'Heart failure performance measures: Eligibility and implementation in the community'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this