Health communication, self-care, and treatment satisfaction among low-income diabetes patients in a public health setting

Richard O White, Svetlana Eden, Kenneth A. Wallston, Sunil Kripalani, Shari Barto, Ayumi Shintani, Russell L. Rothman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

28 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: Diabetes patients with limited resources often experience suboptimal care. Less is known about the role of effective health communication (HC) in caring for low income diabetes patients. Methods: Ten health department clinics in TN participated in a trial evaluating a literacy-sensitive communication intervention. We assessed the quality of baseline HC and measured associations with diabetes outcomes. Assessments included: demographics, measures of HC, health literacy, self-care behaviors, self-efficacy, medication non-adherence, treatment satisfaction, and A1C. Unadjusted and adjusted multivariable regression models were used to test associations. Results: Participants (N= 411) were 49.7. ±. 9.5 years, 61% female, uninsured (96%), with A1C 9.6. ±. 2.1. In unadjusted analyses, better communication, was associated with lower medication non-adherence (OR 0.40-0.68, all p<. 0.05), higher treatment satisfaction (OR 1.76-1.96, all p<. 0.01), portion size reduction (OR 1.43, p<. 0.05), diabetes self-efficacy (OR 1.41, p<. 0.05), and lower A1C (β= -0.06, p<. 0.01). In adjusted analyses, communication quality remained associated with lower medication non-adherence (AOR 0.39-0.68, all p<. 0.05), and higher treatment satisfaction (AOR 1.90-2.21, all p<. 0.001). Conclusions: Better communication between low-income patients and providers was independently associated with lower medication non-adherence and higher treatment satisfaction. Practice Implications: Communication quality may be an important modifiable approach to improving diabetes care for vulnerable populations.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)144-149
Number of pages6
JournalPatient Education and Counseling
Volume98
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2015

Fingerprint

Health Communication
Self Care
Medication Adherence
Public Health
Communication
Self Efficacy
Portion Size
Health Literacy
Therapeutics
Vulnerable Populations
Demography
Health

Keywords

  • Diabetes
  • Health communication
  • Primary care
  • Provider education
  • Public health

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Health communication, self-care, and treatment satisfaction among low-income diabetes patients in a public health setting. / White, Richard O; Eden, Svetlana; Wallston, Kenneth A.; Kripalani, Sunil; Barto, Shari; Shintani, Ayumi; Rothman, Russell L.

In: Patient Education and Counseling, Vol. 98, No. 2, 01.02.2015, p. 144-149.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

White, Richard O ; Eden, Svetlana ; Wallston, Kenneth A. ; Kripalani, Sunil ; Barto, Shari ; Shintani, Ayumi ; Rothman, Russell L. / Health communication, self-care, and treatment satisfaction among low-income diabetes patients in a public health setting. In: Patient Education and Counseling. 2015 ; Vol. 98, No. 2. pp. 144-149.
@article{7ec7249c34b14d72854a10a52cfbba2a,
title = "Health communication, self-care, and treatment satisfaction among low-income diabetes patients in a public health setting",
abstract = "Objective: Diabetes patients with limited resources often experience suboptimal care. Less is known about the role of effective health communication (HC) in caring for low income diabetes patients. Methods: Ten health department clinics in TN participated in a trial evaluating a literacy-sensitive communication intervention. We assessed the quality of baseline HC and measured associations with diabetes outcomes. Assessments included: demographics, measures of HC, health literacy, self-care behaviors, self-efficacy, medication non-adherence, treatment satisfaction, and A1C. Unadjusted and adjusted multivariable regression models were used to test associations. Results: Participants (N= 411) were 49.7. ±. 9.5 years, 61{\%} female, uninsured (96{\%}), with A1C 9.6. ±. 2.1. In unadjusted analyses, better communication, was associated with lower medication non-adherence (OR 0.40-0.68, all p<. 0.05), higher treatment satisfaction (OR 1.76-1.96, all p<. 0.01), portion size reduction (OR 1.43, p<. 0.05), diabetes self-efficacy (OR 1.41, p<. 0.05), and lower A1C (β= -0.06, p<. 0.01). In adjusted analyses, communication quality remained associated with lower medication non-adherence (AOR 0.39-0.68, all p<. 0.05), and higher treatment satisfaction (AOR 1.90-2.21, all p<. 0.001). Conclusions: Better communication between low-income patients and providers was independently associated with lower medication non-adherence and higher treatment satisfaction. Practice Implications: Communication quality may be an important modifiable approach to improving diabetes care for vulnerable populations.",
keywords = "Diabetes, Health communication, Primary care, Provider education, Public health",
author = "White, {Richard O} and Svetlana Eden and Wallston, {Kenneth A.} and Sunil Kripalani and Shari Barto and Ayumi Shintani and Rothman, {Russell L.}",
year = "2015",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.pec.2014.10.019",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "98",
pages = "144--149",
journal = "Patient Education and Counseling",
issn = "0738-3991",
publisher = "Elsevier Ireland Ltd",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Health communication, self-care, and treatment satisfaction among low-income diabetes patients in a public health setting

AU - White, Richard O

AU - Eden, Svetlana

AU - Wallston, Kenneth A.

AU - Kripalani, Sunil

AU - Barto, Shari

AU - Shintani, Ayumi

AU - Rothman, Russell L.

PY - 2015/2/1

Y1 - 2015/2/1

N2 - Objective: Diabetes patients with limited resources often experience suboptimal care. Less is known about the role of effective health communication (HC) in caring for low income diabetes patients. Methods: Ten health department clinics in TN participated in a trial evaluating a literacy-sensitive communication intervention. We assessed the quality of baseline HC and measured associations with diabetes outcomes. Assessments included: demographics, measures of HC, health literacy, self-care behaviors, self-efficacy, medication non-adherence, treatment satisfaction, and A1C. Unadjusted and adjusted multivariable regression models were used to test associations. Results: Participants (N= 411) were 49.7. ±. 9.5 years, 61% female, uninsured (96%), with A1C 9.6. ±. 2.1. In unadjusted analyses, better communication, was associated with lower medication non-adherence (OR 0.40-0.68, all p<. 0.05), higher treatment satisfaction (OR 1.76-1.96, all p<. 0.01), portion size reduction (OR 1.43, p<. 0.05), diabetes self-efficacy (OR 1.41, p<. 0.05), and lower A1C (β= -0.06, p<. 0.01). In adjusted analyses, communication quality remained associated with lower medication non-adherence (AOR 0.39-0.68, all p<. 0.05), and higher treatment satisfaction (AOR 1.90-2.21, all p<. 0.001). Conclusions: Better communication between low-income patients and providers was independently associated with lower medication non-adherence and higher treatment satisfaction. Practice Implications: Communication quality may be an important modifiable approach to improving diabetes care for vulnerable populations.

AB - Objective: Diabetes patients with limited resources often experience suboptimal care. Less is known about the role of effective health communication (HC) in caring for low income diabetes patients. Methods: Ten health department clinics in TN participated in a trial evaluating a literacy-sensitive communication intervention. We assessed the quality of baseline HC and measured associations with diabetes outcomes. Assessments included: demographics, measures of HC, health literacy, self-care behaviors, self-efficacy, medication non-adherence, treatment satisfaction, and A1C. Unadjusted and adjusted multivariable regression models were used to test associations. Results: Participants (N= 411) were 49.7. ±. 9.5 years, 61% female, uninsured (96%), with A1C 9.6. ±. 2.1. In unadjusted analyses, better communication, was associated with lower medication non-adherence (OR 0.40-0.68, all p<. 0.05), higher treatment satisfaction (OR 1.76-1.96, all p<. 0.01), portion size reduction (OR 1.43, p<. 0.05), diabetes self-efficacy (OR 1.41, p<. 0.05), and lower A1C (β= -0.06, p<. 0.01). In adjusted analyses, communication quality remained associated with lower medication non-adherence (AOR 0.39-0.68, all p<. 0.05), and higher treatment satisfaction (AOR 1.90-2.21, all p<. 0.001). Conclusions: Better communication between low-income patients and providers was independently associated with lower medication non-adherence and higher treatment satisfaction. Practice Implications: Communication quality may be an important modifiable approach to improving diabetes care for vulnerable populations.

KW - Diabetes

KW - Health communication

KW - Primary care

KW - Provider education

KW - Public health

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84920847202&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84920847202&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.pec.2014.10.019

DO - 10.1016/j.pec.2014.10.019

M3 - Article

VL - 98

SP - 144

EP - 149

JO - Patient Education and Counseling

JF - Patient Education and Counseling

SN - 0738-3991

IS - 2

ER -