Health coaching interventions for persons with chronic conditions: A systematic review and meta-analysis protocol

Kasey R. Boehmer, Suzette Barakat, Sangwoo Ahn, Larry J. Prokop, Patricia J. Erwin, Mohammad H Murad

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Chronic conditions are increasingly more common and negatively impact quality of life, disability, morbidity, and mortality. Health coaching has emerged as a possible intervention to help individuals with chronic conditions adopt health supportive behaviors that improve both quality of life and health outcomes. Methods/design: We planned a systematic review and meta-analysis of the contemporary health coaching literature published in the last decade to evaluate the effect of health coaching on clinically important, disease-specific, functional, and behavioral outcomes. We will include randomized controlled trials or quasi-experimental studies that compared health coaching to alternative interventions or usual care. To enable adoption of effective interventions, we aim to explore how the effect of intervention is modified by the intervention components, delivering personnel (i.e., health professionals vs trained lay or peer persons), dose, frequency, and setting. Analysis of intervention outcomes will be reported and classified using an existing theoretical framework, the Theory of Patient Capacity, to identify the areas of patients' capacity to access and use healthcare and enact self-care where coaching may be an effective intervention. Discussion: This systematic review and meta-analysis will identify and synthesize evidence to inform the practice of health coaching by providing evidence on components and characteristics of the intervention essential for success in individuals with chronic health conditions. Systematic review registration: PROSPERO CRD42016039730.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number146
JournalSystematic Reviews
Volume5
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2016

Fingerprint

Meta-Analysis
Health
Quality of Life
Mentoring
Self Care
Health Personnel
Randomized Controlled Trials
Morbidity
Delivery of Health Care
Mortality

Keywords

  • Chronic condition
  • Chronic disease
  • Health coaching
  • Life coaching
  • Patient capacity
  • Wellness coaching

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine (miscellaneous)

Cite this

Health coaching interventions for persons with chronic conditions : A systematic review and meta-analysis protocol. / Boehmer, Kasey R.; Barakat, Suzette; Ahn, Sangwoo; Prokop, Larry J.; Erwin, Patricia J.; Murad, Mohammad H.

In: Systematic Reviews, Vol. 5, No. 1, 146, 01.09.2016.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Boehmer, Kasey R. ; Barakat, Suzette ; Ahn, Sangwoo ; Prokop, Larry J. ; Erwin, Patricia J. ; Murad, Mohammad H. / Health coaching interventions for persons with chronic conditions : A systematic review and meta-analysis protocol. In: Systematic Reviews. 2016 ; Vol. 5, No. 1.
@article{5da89bf612894ca79e1428175b5b9768,
title = "Health coaching interventions for persons with chronic conditions: A systematic review and meta-analysis protocol",
abstract = "Background: Chronic conditions are increasingly more common and negatively impact quality of life, disability, morbidity, and mortality. Health coaching has emerged as a possible intervention to help individuals with chronic conditions adopt health supportive behaviors that improve both quality of life and health outcomes. Methods/design: We planned a systematic review and meta-analysis of the contemporary health coaching literature published in the last decade to evaluate the effect of health coaching on clinically important, disease-specific, functional, and behavioral outcomes. We will include randomized controlled trials or quasi-experimental studies that compared health coaching to alternative interventions or usual care. To enable adoption of effective interventions, we aim to explore how the effect of intervention is modified by the intervention components, delivering personnel (i.e., health professionals vs trained lay or peer persons), dose, frequency, and setting. Analysis of intervention outcomes will be reported and classified using an existing theoretical framework, the Theory of Patient Capacity, to identify the areas of patients' capacity to access and use healthcare and enact self-care where coaching may be an effective intervention. Discussion: This systematic review and meta-analysis will identify and synthesize evidence to inform the practice of health coaching by providing evidence on components and characteristics of the intervention essential for success in individuals with chronic health conditions. Systematic review registration: PROSPERO CRD42016039730.",
keywords = "Chronic condition, Chronic disease, Health coaching, Life coaching, Patient capacity, Wellness coaching",
author = "Boehmer, {Kasey R.} and Suzette Barakat and Sangwoo Ahn and Prokop, {Larry J.} and Erwin, {Patricia J.} and Murad, {Mohammad H}",
year = "2016",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1186/s13643-016-0316-3",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "5",
journal = "Systematic Reviews",
issn = "2046-4053",
publisher = "BioMed Central",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Health coaching interventions for persons with chronic conditions

T2 - A systematic review and meta-analysis protocol

AU - Boehmer, Kasey R.

AU - Barakat, Suzette

AU - Ahn, Sangwoo

AU - Prokop, Larry J.

AU - Erwin, Patricia J.

AU - Murad, Mohammad H

PY - 2016/9/1

Y1 - 2016/9/1

N2 - Background: Chronic conditions are increasingly more common and negatively impact quality of life, disability, morbidity, and mortality. Health coaching has emerged as a possible intervention to help individuals with chronic conditions adopt health supportive behaviors that improve both quality of life and health outcomes. Methods/design: We planned a systematic review and meta-analysis of the contemporary health coaching literature published in the last decade to evaluate the effect of health coaching on clinically important, disease-specific, functional, and behavioral outcomes. We will include randomized controlled trials or quasi-experimental studies that compared health coaching to alternative interventions or usual care. To enable adoption of effective interventions, we aim to explore how the effect of intervention is modified by the intervention components, delivering personnel (i.e., health professionals vs trained lay or peer persons), dose, frequency, and setting. Analysis of intervention outcomes will be reported and classified using an existing theoretical framework, the Theory of Patient Capacity, to identify the areas of patients' capacity to access and use healthcare and enact self-care where coaching may be an effective intervention. Discussion: This systematic review and meta-analysis will identify and synthesize evidence to inform the practice of health coaching by providing evidence on components and characteristics of the intervention essential for success in individuals with chronic health conditions. Systematic review registration: PROSPERO CRD42016039730.

AB - Background: Chronic conditions are increasingly more common and negatively impact quality of life, disability, morbidity, and mortality. Health coaching has emerged as a possible intervention to help individuals with chronic conditions adopt health supportive behaviors that improve both quality of life and health outcomes. Methods/design: We planned a systematic review and meta-analysis of the contemporary health coaching literature published in the last decade to evaluate the effect of health coaching on clinically important, disease-specific, functional, and behavioral outcomes. We will include randomized controlled trials or quasi-experimental studies that compared health coaching to alternative interventions or usual care. To enable adoption of effective interventions, we aim to explore how the effect of intervention is modified by the intervention components, delivering personnel (i.e., health professionals vs trained lay or peer persons), dose, frequency, and setting. Analysis of intervention outcomes will be reported and classified using an existing theoretical framework, the Theory of Patient Capacity, to identify the areas of patients' capacity to access and use healthcare and enact self-care where coaching may be an effective intervention. Discussion: This systematic review and meta-analysis will identify and synthesize evidence to inform the practice of health coaching by providing evidence on components and characteristics of the intervention essential for success in individuals with chronic health conditions. Systematic review registration: PROSPERO CRD42016039730.

KW - Chronic condition

KW - Chronic disease

KW - Health coaching

KW - Life coaching

KW - Patient capacity

KW - Wellness coaching

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84984827990&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84984827990&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1186/s13643-016-0316-3

DO - 10.1186/s13643-016-0316-3

M3 - Article

C2 - 27585627

AN - SCOPUS:84984827990

VL - 5

JO - Systematic Reviews

JF - Systematic Reviews

SN - 2046-4053

IS - 1

M1 - 146

ER -