TY - JOUR
T1 - Health beliefs, salience of breast cancer family history, and involvement with breast cancer issues
T2 - Adherence to annual mammography screening recommendations
AU - Finney Rutten, Lila J.
AU - Iannotti, Ronald J.
PY - 2003/1/1
Y1 - 2003/1/1
N2 - Involvement in breast cancer (BC) issues, and the degree to which family history of BC influences perceived risk (salience of family history), have been proposed as additions to the Health Belief Model as applied to mammography adherence. Barriers and benefits of mammography, perceived susceptibility, severity, cues to action, salience of family history, and issue involvement with respect to BC were examined in adherent (n = 97) and non-adherent (n = 213) women. Adherent women with positive family histories reported greater benefits of mammography, greater response to cues to action, and higher salience of family history than women with negative family histories. Non-adherent women with positive family histories reported fewer benefits of mammography and greater issue involvement, and perceived BC as less severe than those with negative family histories. Benefits (OR = 1.51), susceptibility (OR = 1.41), issue involvement (OR = 1.59), severity (OR = 0.66), and cues to action (OR = 0.75) were significantly associated with adherence. Results have implications for evidence-based interventions.
AB - Involvement in breast cancer (BC) issues, and the degree to which family history of BC influences perceived risk (salience of family history), have been proposed as additions to the Health Belief Model as applied to mammography adherence. Barriers and benefits of mammography, perceived susceptibility, severity, cues to action, salience of family history, and issue involvement with respect to BC were examined in adherent (n = 97) and non-adherent (n = 213) women. Adherent women with positive family histories reported greater benefits of mammography, greater response to cues to action, and higher salience of family history than women with negative family histories. Non-adherent women with positive family histories reported fewer benefits of mammography and greater issue involvement, and perceived BC as less severe than those with negative family histories. Benefits (OR = 1.51), susceptibility (OR = 1.41), issue involvement (OR = 1.59), severity (OR = 0.66), and cues to action (OR = 0.75) were significantly associated with adherence. Results have implications for evidence-based interventions.
KW - Health belief model
KW - Patient adherence
KW - Reminder systems
KW - Screening adherence
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0242657649&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0242657649&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/S0361-090X(03)00133-8
DO - 10.1016/S0361-090X(03)00133-8
M3 - Article
C2 - 14585322
AN - SCOPUS:0242657649
SN - 1877-7821
VL - 27
SP - 353
EP - 359
JO - Cancer Epidemiology
JF - Cancer Epidemiology
IS - 5
ER -