Headache after traumatic brain injury

A national survey of clinical practices and treatment approaches

Allen W Brown, Thomas K. Watanabe, Jeanne M. Hoffman, Kathleen R. Bell, Sylvia Lucas, Sureyya Dikmen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Individuals with headache after traumatic brain injury (TBI) receive care in a wide variety of clinical locations by physicians trained in multiple specialties. Objective: To understand current practice patterns and perceptions of treatment issues among clinicians managing headache after TBI. Design: National survey of current clinical practice using a 20-item questionnaire developed by the authors. Participants: Survey respondents were members of the Central Nervous System Council list survey of the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (N = 1782) and the American Headache Society membership (N = 1260). Methods: The survey was sent electronically to potential participants and was followed by 2 biweekly reminders. The survey queried the physicians' clinical setting; their use of headache classification systems, headache diaries, checklists, and diagnostic procedures; the pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic treatments prescribed; and headache chronicity and associated symptoms and disorders among their patients with TBI. Results: Completed surveys were received from 193 respondents. The use of standardized classification systems and checklists was commonly reported. Respondents used nonpharmacologic and pharmacologic treatment approaches with similar frequency and modest perceived success rates. A high frequency of headache-associated new sleep and mood disorders was reported. When response differences occurred between practice settings, they reflected a focus on headache diagnosis, classification, and pharmacologic treatment among neurology and specialty headache clinics, whereas a nonpharmacologic approach to management among TBI specialty and general rehabilitation clinicians was more commonly reported. Conclusion: Management strategies for treating headache after TBI vary widely among general and specialty clinical practices. This suggests that additional research is needed that would lead to an increase in the use of established headache classification and the development of standardized management approaches so that all practitioners who care for patients after TBI can provide consistent effective care.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)3-8
Number of pages6
JournalPM and R
Volume7
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 2015

Fingerprint

Headache
Therapeutics
Checklist
Surveys and Questionnaires
Traumatic Brain Injury
Physicians
Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine
Neurology
Mood Disorders
Patient Care
Rehabilitation
Central Nervous System
Research

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Rehabilitation
  • Neurology
  • Clinical Neurology
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

Cite this

Headache after traumatic brain injury : A national survey of clinical practices and treatment approaches. / Brown, Allen W; Watanabe, Thomas K.; Hoffman, Jeanne M.; Bell, Kathleen R.; Lucas, Sylvia; Dikmen, Sureyya.

In: PM and R, Vol. 7, No. 1, 2015, p. 3-8.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Brown, Allen W ; Watanabe, Thomas K. ; Hoffman, Jeanne M. ; Bell, Kathleen R. ; Lucas, Sylvia ; Dikmen, Sureyya. / Headache after traumatic brain injury : A national survey of clinical practices and treatment approaches. In: PM and R. 2015 ; Vol. 7, No. 1. pp. 3-8.
@article{5107772b317f49588cc3f657d1a39e7d,
title = "Headache after traumatic brain injury: A national survey of clinical practices and treatment approaches",
abstract = "Background: Individuals with headache after traumatic brain injury (TBI) receive care in a wide variety of clinical locations by physicians trained in multiple specialties. Objective: To understand current practice patterns and perceptions of treatment issues among clinicians managing headache after TBI. Design: National survey of current clinical practice using a 20-item questionnaire developed by the authors. Participants: Survey respondents were members of the Central Nervous System Council list survey of the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (N = 1782) and the American Headache Society membership (N = 1260). Methods: The survey was sent electronically to potential participants and was followed by 2 biweekly reminders. The survey queried the physicians' clinical setting; their use of headache classification systems, headache diaries, checklists, and diagnostic procedures; the pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic treatments prescribed; and headache chronicity and associated symptoms and disorders among their patients with TBI. Results: Completed surveys were received from 193 respondents. The use of standardized classification systems and checklists was commonly reported. Respondents used nonpharmacologic and pharmacologic treatment approaches with similar frequency and modest perceived success rates. A high frequency of headache-associated new sleep and mood disorders was reported. When response differences occurred between practice settings, they reflected a focus on headache diagnosis, classification, and pharmacologic treatment among neurology and specialty headache clinics, whereas a nonpharmacologic approach to management among TBI specialty and general rehabilitation clinicians was more commonly reported. Conclusion: Management strategies for treating headache after TBI vary widely among general and specialty clinical practices. This suggests that additional research is needed that would lead to an increase in the use of established headache classification and the development of standardized management approaches so that all practitioners who care for patients after TBI can provide consistent effective care.",
author = "Brown, {Allen W} and Watanabe, {Thomas K.} and Hoffman, {Jeanne M.} and Bell, {Kathleen R.} and Sylvia Lucas and Sureyya Dikmen",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.1016/j.pmrj.2014.06.016",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "7",
pages = "3--8",
journal = "PM and R",
issn = "1934-1482",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Headache after traumatic brain injury

T2 - A national survey of clinical practices and treatment approaches

AU - Brown, Allen W

AU - Watanabe, Thomas K.

AU - Hoffman, Jeanne M.

AU - Bell, Kathleen R.

AU - Lucas, Sylvia

AU - Dikmen, Sureyya

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - Background: Individuals with headache after traumatic brain injury (TBI) receive care in a wide variety of clinical locations by physicians trained in multiple specialties. Objective: To understand current practice patterns and perceptions of treatment issues among clinicians managing headache after TBI. Design: National survey of current clinical practice using a 20-item questionnaire developed by the authors. Participants: Survey respondents were members of the Central Nervous System Council list survey of the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (N = 1782) and the American Headache Society membership (N = 1260). Methods: The survey was sent electronically to potential participants and was followed by 2 biweekly reminders. The survey queried the physicians' clinical setting; their use of headache classification systems, headache diaries, checklists, and diagnostic procedures; the pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic treatments prescribed; and headache chronicity and associated symptoms and disorders among their patients with TBI. Results: Completed surveys were received from 193 respondents. The use of standardized classification systems and checklists was commonly reported. Respondents used nonpharmacologic and pharmacologic treatment approaches with similar frequency and modest perceived success rates. A high frequency of headache-associated new sleep and mood disorders was reported. When response differences occurred between practice settings, they reflected a focus on headache diagnosis, classification, and pharmacologic treatment among neurology and specialty headache clinics, whereas a nonpharmacologic approach to management among TBI specialty and general rehabilitation clinicians was more commonly reported. Conclusion: Management strategies for treating headache after TBI vary widely among general and specialty clinical practices. This suggests that additional research is needed that would lead to an increase in the use of established headache classification and the development of standardized management approaches so that all practitioners who care for patients after TBI can provide consistent effective care.

AB - Background: Individuals with headache after traumatic brain injury (TBI) receive care in a wide variety of clinical locations by physicians trained in multiple specialties. Objective: To understand current practice patterns and perceptions of treatment issues among clinicians managing headache after TBI. Design: National survey of current clinical practice using a 20-item questionnaire developed by the authors. Participants: Survey respondents were members of the Central Nervous System Council list survey of the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (N = 1782) and the American Headache Society membership (N = 1260). Methods: The survey was sent electronically to potential participants and was followed by 2 biweekly reminders. The survey queried the physicians' clinical setting; their use of headache classification systems, headache diaries, checklists, and diagnostic procedures; the pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic treatments prescribed; and headache chronicity and associated symptoms and disorders among their patients with TBI. Results: Completed surveys were received from 193 respondents. The use of standardized classification systems and checklists was commonly reported. Respondents used nonpharmacologic and pharmacologic treatment approaches with similar frequency and modest perceived success rates. A high frequency of headache-associated new sleep and mood disorders was reported. When response differences occurred between practice settings, they reflected a focus on headache diagnosis, classification, and pharmacologic treatment among neurology and specialty headache clinics, whereas a nonpharmacologic approach to management among TBI specialty and general rehabilitation clinicians was more commonly reported. Conclusion: Management strategies for treating headache after TBI vary widely among general and specialty clinical practices. This suggests that additional research is needed that would lead to an increase in the use of established headache classification and the development of standardized management approaches so that all practitioners who care for patients after TBI can provide consistent effective care.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84939131573&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84939131573&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.pmrj.2014.06.016

DO - 10.1016/j.pmrj.2014.06.016

M3 - Article

VL - 7

SP - 3

EP - 8

JO - PM and R

JF - PM and R

SN - 1934-1482

IS - 1

ER -