Has Neo-Darwinism failed clinical medicine: Does systems biology have to?

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In this essay I argue that Neo-Darwinism ultimately led to an oversimplified genotype equals phenotype view of human disease. This view has been called into question by the unexpected results of the Human Genome Project which has painted a far more complex picture of the genetic features of human disease than was anticipated. Cell centric Systems Biology is now attempting to reconcile this complexity. However, it too is limited because most common chronic diseases have systemic components not predicted by their intracellular responses alone. In this context, congestive heart failure is a classic example of this general problem and I discuss it as a systemic disease vs. one solely related to dysfunctional cardiomyocytes. I close by arguing that a physiological perspective is essential to reconcile reductionism with what is required to understand and treat disease.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)107-112
Number of pages6
JournalProgress in Biophysics and Molecular Biology
Volume117
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2015

Fingerprint

Systems Biology
Clinical Medicine
Human Genome Project
Medical Genetics
Cardiac Myocytes
Chronic Disease
Heart Failure
Genotype
Phenotype

Keywords

  • Homeostasis
  • Integration
  • Multi-scale
  • Physiology

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Molecular Biology
  • Biophysics

Cite this

Has Neo-Darwinism failed clinical medicine : Does systems biology have to? / Joyner, Michael Joseph.

In: Progress in Biophysics and Molecular Biology, Vol. 117, No. 1, 01.01.2015, p. 107-112.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{db0448fdc6544b238678114b34a1d6e2,
title = "Has Neo-Darwinism failed clinical medicine: Does systems biology have to?",
abstract = "In this essay I argue that Neo-Darwinism ultimately led to an oversimplified genotype equals phenotype view of human disease. This view has been called into question by the unexpected results of the Human Genome Project which has painted a far more complex picture of the genetic features of human disease than was anticipated. Cell centric Systems Biology is now attempting to reconcile this complexity. However, it too is limited because most common chronic diseases have systemic components not predicted by their intracellular responses alone. In this context, congestive heart failure is a classic example of this general problem and I discuss it as a systemic disease vs. one solely related to dysfunctional cardiomyocytes. I close by arguing that a physiological perspective is essential to reconcile reductionism with what is required to understand and treat disease.",
keywords = "Homeostasis, Integration, Multi-scale, Physiology",
author = "Joyner, {Michael Joseph}",
year = "2015",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2014.09.010",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "117",
pages = "107--112",
journal = "Progress in Biophysics and Molecular Biology",
issn = "0079-6107",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Has Neo-Darwinism failed clinical medicine

T2 - Does systems biology have to?

AU - Joyner, Michael Joseph

PY - 2015/1/1

Y1 - 2015/1/1

N2 - In this essay I argue that Neo-Darwinism ultimately led to an oversimplified genotype equals phenotype view of human disease. This view has been called into question by the unexpected results of the Human Genome Project which has painted a far more complex picture of the genetic features of human disease than was anticipated. Cell centric Systems Biology is now attempting to reconcile this complexity. However, it too is limited because most common chronic diseases have systemic components not predicted by their intracellular responses alone. In this context, congestive heart failure is a classic example of this general problem and I discuss it as a systemic disease vs. one solely related to dysfunctional cardiomyocytes. I close by arguing that a physiological perspective is essential to reconcile reductionism with what is required to understand and treat disease.

AB - In this essay I argue that Neo-Darwinism ultimately led to an oversimplified genotype equals phenotype view of human disease. This view has been called into question by the unexpected results of the Human Genome Project which has painted a far more complex picture of the genetic features of human disease than was anticipated. Cell centric Systems Biology is now attempting to reconcile this complexity. However, it too is limited because most common chronic diseases have systemic components not predicted by their intracellular responses alone. In this context, congestive heart failure is a classic example of this general problem and I discuss it as a systemic disease vs. one solely related to dysfunctional cardiomyocytes. I close by arguing that a physiological perspective is essential to reconcile reductionism with what is required to understand and treat disease.

KW - Homeostasis

KW - Integration

KW - Multi-scale

KW - Physiology

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84924696962&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84924696962&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2014.09.010

DO - 10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2014.09.010

M3 - Article

C2 - 25481704

AN - SCOPUS:84924696962

VL - 117

SP - 107

EP - 112

JO - Progress in Biophysics and Molecular Biology

JF - Progress in Biophysics and Molecular Biology

SN - 0079-6107

IS - 1

ER -