Guidelines for reporting meta-epidemiological methodology research

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

16 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Published research should be reported to evidence users with clarity and transparency that facilitate optimal appraisal and use of evidence and allow replication by other researchers. Guidelines for such reporting are available for several types of studies but not for meta-epidemiological methodology studies. Meta-epidemiological studies adopt a systematic review or meta-analysis approach to examine the impact of certain characteristics of clinical studies on the observed effect and provide empirical evidence for hypothesised associations. The unit of analysis in meta-epidemiological studies is a study, not a patient. The outcomes of meta-epidemiological studies are usually not clinical outcomes. In this guideline, we adapt items from the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) to fit the context of meta-epidemiological studies.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)139-142
Number of pages4
JournalEvidence-Based Medicine
Volume22
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 1 2017

Fingerprint

Epidemiologic Studies
Guidelines
Research
Meta-Analysis
Research Personnel

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Guidelines for reporting meta-epidemiological methodology research. / Murad, Mohammad H; Wang, Zhen.

In: Evidence-Based Medicine, Vol. 22, No. 4, 01.08.2017, p. 139-142.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{b6b2f39a715a4fbb9e267024d2b68e1a,
title = "Guidelines for reporting meta-epidemiological methodology research",
abstract = "Published research should be reported to evidence users with clarity and transparency that facilitate optimal appraisal and use of evidence and allow replication by other researchers. Guidelines for such reporting are available for several types of studies but not for meta-epidemiological methodology studies. Meta-epidemiological studies adopt a systematic review or meta-analysis approach to examine the impact of certain characteristics of clinical studies on the observed effect and provide empirical evidence for hypothesised associations. The unit of analysis in meta-epidemiological studies is a study, not a patient. The outcomes of meta-epidemiological studies are usually not clinical outcomes. In this guideline, we adapt items from the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) to fit the context of meta-epidemiological studies.",
author = "Murad, {Mohammad H} and Zhen Wang",
year = "2017",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1136/ebmed-2017-110713",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "22",
pages = "139--142",
journal = "Evidence-Based Medicine",
issn = "1356-5524",
publisher = "BMJ Publishing Group",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Guidelines for reporting meta-epidemiological methodology research

AU - Murad, Mohammad H

AU - Wang, Zhen

PY - 2017/8/1

Y1 - 2017/8/1

N2 - Published research should be reported to evidence users with clarity and transparency that facilitate optimal appraisal and use of evidence and allow replication by other researchers. Guidelines for such reporting are available for several types of studies but not for meta-epidemiological methodology studies. Meta-epidemiological studies adopt a systematic review or meta-analysis approach to examine the impact of certain characteristics of clinical studies on the observed effect and provide empirical evidence for hypothesised associations. The unit of analysis in meta-epidemiological studies is a study, not a patient. The outcomes of meta-epidemiological studies are usually not clinical outcomes. In this guideline, we adapt items from the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) to fit the context of meta-epidemiological studies.

AB - Published research should be reported to evidence users with clarity and transparency that facilitate optimal appraisal and use of evidence and allow replication by other researchers. Guidelines for such reporting are available for several types of studies but not for meta-epidemiological methodology studies. Meta-epidemiological studies adopt a systematic review or meta-analysis approach to examine the impact of certain characteristics of clinical studies on the observed effect and provide empirical evidence for hypothesised associations. The unit of analysis in meta-epidemiological studies is a study, not a patient. The outcomes of meta-epidemiological studies are usually not clinical outcomes. In this guideline, we adapt items from the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) to fit the context of meta-epidemiological studies.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85026291074&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85026291074&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1136/ebmed-2017-110713

DO - 10.1136/ebmed-2017-110713

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85026291074

VL - 22

SP - 139

EP - 142

JO - Evidence-Based Medicine

JF - Evidence-Based Medicine

SN - 1356-5524

IS - 4

ER -