Grading the quality of evidence in complex interventions: A guide for evidence-based practitioners

M. Hassan Murad, Jehad Almasri, Mouaz Alsawas, Wigdan Farah

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Scopus citations

Abstract

Evidence-based practitioners who want to apply evidence from complex interventions to the care of their patients are often challenged by the difficulty of grading the quality of this evidence. Using the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation) approach and an illustrative example, we propose a framework for evaluating the quality of evidence that depends on obtaining feedback from the evidence user (eg, guideline panel) to inform: (1) proper framing of the question, (2) judgements about directness and consistency of evidence and (3) the need for additional contextual and qualitative evidence. Using this framework, different evidence users and based on their needs would consider the same evidence as high, moderate, low or very low.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)20-22
Number of pages3
JournalEvidence-Based Medicine
Volume22
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2017

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Grading the quality of evidence in complex interventions: A guide for evidence-based practitioners'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this