Getting maintenance of certification to work: A grounded theory study of physicians' perceptions

David A. Cook, Eric S. Holmboe, Kristi J. Sorensen, Richard A. Berger, John M. Wilkinson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  • 35 Citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVE To identify barriers and enabling features associated with MOC and how MOC can be changed to better accomplish its intended purposes.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Grounded theory focus group study of 50 board-certified primary care and subspecialist internal medicine and family medicine physicians in an academic medical center and outlying community sites.

EXPOSURES Eleven focus groups.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Constant comparativemethod to analyze transcripts and identify themes related to MOC perceptions and purposes and to construct a model to guide improvement.

RESULTS Participants identified misalignments between the espoused purposes of MOC (eg, to promote high-quality care, commitment to the profession, lifelong learning, and the science of quality improvement) and MOC as currently implemented. At present, MOC is perceived by physicians as an inefficient and logistically difficult activity for learning or assessment, often irrelevant to practice, and of little benefit to physicians, patients, or society. To resolve these misalignments, we propose a model that invites increased support from organizations, effectiveness and relevance of learning activities, value to physicians, integration with clinical practice, and coherence across MOC tasks.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Physicians view MOC as an unnecessarily complex process that is misaligned with its purposes. Acknowledging and correcting these misalignments will help MOC meet physicians' needs and improve patient care.

IMPORTANCE Despite general support for the goals of maintenance of certification (MOC), concerns have been raised about its effectiveness, relevance, and value.

LanguageEnglish (US)
Pages35-42
Number of pages8
JournalJAMA Internal Medicine
Volume175
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2015

Fingerprint

Certification
Maintenance
Physicians
Learning
Focus Groups
Grounded Theory
Quality of Health Care
Family Physicians
Internal Medicine
Quality Improvement
Primary Health Care
Patient Care
Medicine
Organizations

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Internal Medicine
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Getting maintenance of certification to work : A grounded theory study of physicians' perceptions. / Cook, David A.; Holmboe, Eric S.; Sorensen, Kristi J.; Berger, Richard A.; Wilkinson, John M.

In: JAMA Internal Medicine, Vol. 175, No. 1, 01.01.2015, p. 35-42.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Cook, David A. ; Holmboe, Eric S. ; Sorensen, Kristi J. ; Berger, Richard A. ; Wilkinson, John M./ Getting maintenance of certification to work : A grounded theory study of physicians' perceptions. In: JAMA Internal Medicine. 2015 ; Vol. 175, No. 1. pp. 35-42
@article{a869349c8ea4479c87b0b7741baf7d0f,
title = "Getting maintenance of certification to work: A grounded theory study of physicians' perceptions",
abstract = "OBJECTIVE To identify barriers and enabling features associated with MOC and how MOC can be changed to better accomplish its intended purposes.DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Grounded theory focus group study of 50 board-certified primary care and subspecialist internal medicine and family medicine physicians in an academic medical center and outlying community sites.EXPOSURES Eleven focus groups.MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Constant comparativemethod to analyze transcripts and identify themes related to MOC perceptions and purposes and to construct a model to guide improvement.RESULTS Participants identified misalignments between the espoused purposes of MOC (eg, to promote high-quality care, commitment to the profession, lifelong learning, and the science of quality improvement) and MOC as currently implemented. At present, MOC is perceived by physicians as an inefficient and logistically difficult activity for learning or assessment, often irrelevant to practice, and of little benefit to physicians, patients, or society. To resolve these misalignments, we propose a model that invites increased support from organizations, effectiveness and relevance of learning activities, value to physicians, integration with clinical practice, and coherence across MOC tasks.CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Physicians view MOC as an unnecessarily complex process that is misaligned with its purposes. Acknowledging and correcting these misalignments will help MOC meet physicians' needs and improve patient care.IMPORTANCE Despite general support for the goals of maintenance of certification (MOC), concerns have been raised about its effectiveness, relevance, and value.",
author = "Cook, {David A.} and Holmboe, {Eric S.} and Sorensen, {Kristi J.} and Berger, {Richard A.} and Wilkinson, {John M.}",
year = "2015",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.5437",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "175",
pages = "35--42",
journal = "JAMA Internal Medicine",
issn = "2168-6106",
publisher = "American Medical Association",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Getting maintenance of certification to work

T2 - JAMA Internal Medicine

AU - Cook,David A.

AU - Holmboe,Eric S.

AU - Sorensen,Kristi J.

AU - Berger,Richard A.

AU - Wilkinson,John M.

PY - 2015/1/1

Y1 - 2015/1/1

N2 - OBJECTIVE To identify barriers and enabling features associated with MOC and how MOC can be changed to better accomplish its intended purposes.DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Grounded theory focus group study of 50 board-certified primary care and subspecialist internal medicine and family medicine physicians in an academic medical center and outlying community sites.EXPOSURES Eleven focus groups.MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Constant comparativemethod to analyze transcripts and identify themes related to MOC perceptions and purposes and to construct a model to guide improvement.RESULTS Participants identified misalignments between the espoused purposes of MOC (eg, to promote high-quality care, commitment to the profession, lifelong learning, and the science of quality improvement) and MOC as currently implemented. At present, MOC is perceived by physicians as an inefficient and logistically difficult activity for learning or assessment, often irrelevant to practice, and of little benefit to physicians, patients, or society. To resolve these misalignments, we propose a model that invites increased support from organizations, effectiveness and relevance of learning activities, value to physicians, integration with clinical practice, and coherence across MOC tasks.CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Physicians view MOC as an unnecessarily complex process that is misaligned with its purposes. Acknowledging and correcting these misalignments will help MOC meet physicians' needs and improve patient care.IMPORTANCE Despite general support for the goals of maintenance of certification (MOC), concerns have been raised about its effectiveness, relevance, and value.

AB - OBJECTIVE To identify barriers and enabling features associated with MOC and how MOC can be changed to better accomplish its intended purposes.DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Grounded theory focus group study of 50 board-certified primary care and subspecialist internal medicine and family medicine physicians in an academic medical center and outlying community sites.EXPOSURES Eleven focus groups.MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Constant comparativemethod to analyze transcripts and identify themes related to MOC perceptions and purposes and to construct a model to guide improvement.RESULTS Participants identified misalignments between the espoused purposes of MOC (eg, to promote high-quality care, commitment to the profession, lifelong learning, and the science of quality improvement) and MOC as currently implemented. At present, MOC is perceived by physicians as an inefficient and logistically difficult activity for learning or assessment, often irrelevant to practice, and of little benefit to physicians, patients, or society. To resolve these misalignments, we propose a model that invites increased support from organizations, effectiveness and relevance of learning activities, value to physicians, integration with clinical practice, and coherence across MOC tasks.CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Physicians view MOC as an unnecessarily complex process that is misaligned with its purposes. Acknowledging and correcting these misalignments will help MOC meet physicians' needs and improve patient care.IMPORTANCE Despite general support for the goals of maintenance of certification (MOC), concerns have been raised about its effectiveness, relevance, and value.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84920550666&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84920550666&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.5437

DO - 10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.5437

M3 - Article

VL - 175

SP - 35

EP - 42

JO - JAMA Internal Medicine

JF - JAMA Internal Medicine

SN - 2168-6106

IS - 1

ER -