Geographic disparities in the distribution of the U.S. gynecologic oncology workforce: A Society of Gynecologic Oncology study

Stephanie Ricci, Ana I. Tergas, Kara Long Roche, Melissa Gerardi Fairbairn, Kimberly L. Levinson, Sean Christopher Dowdy, Robert E. Bristow, Micael Lopez, Katrina Slaughter, Kathleen Moore, Amanda N. Fader

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A recent ASCO workforce study projects a significant shortage of oncologists in the U.S. by 2020, especially in rural/underserved (R/US) areas. The current study aim was to determine the patterns of distribution of U.S. gynecologic oncologists (GO) and to identify provider-based attitudes and barriers that may prevent GOs from practicing in R/US regions. U.S. GOs (n = 743) were electronically solicited to participate in an on-line survey regarding geographic distribution and participation in outreach care. A total of 320 GOs (43%) responded; median age range was 35–45 years and 57% were male. Most practiced in an urban setting (72%) at a university hospital (43%). Only 13% of GOs practiced in an area with a population < 50,000. A desire to remain in academics and exposure to senior-level mentorship were the factors most influencing initial practice location. Approximately 50% believed geographic disparities exist in GO workforce distribution that pose access barriers to care; however, 39% “strongly agreed” that cancer patients who live in R/US regions should travel to urban cancer centers to receive care within a center of excellence model. GOs who practice within 50 miles of only 0–5 other GOs were more likely to provide R/US care compared to those practicing within 50 miles of ≥ 10 GOs (p < 0.0001). Most (39%) believed the major barriers to providing cancer care in R/US areas were volume and systems-based. Most also believed the best solution was a hybrid approach, with coordination of local and centralized cancer care services. Among GOs, a self-reported rural-urban disparity exists in the density of gynecologic oncologists. These study findings may help address barriers to providing cancer care in R/US practice environments.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)100-104
Number of pages5
JournalGynecologic Oncology Reports
Volume22
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1 2017

Fingerprint

Neoplasms
Mentors
Oncologists
Population
Surveys and Questionnaires

Keywords

  • Geographic disparities
  • Gynecologic cancer care

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oncology
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology

Cite this

Geographic disparities in the distribution of the U.S. gynecologic oncology workforce : A Society of Gynecologic Oncology study. / Ricci, Stephanie; Tergas, Ana I.; Long Roche, Kara; Fairbairn, Melissa Gerardi; Levinson, Kimberly L.; Dowdy, Sean Christopher; Bristow, Robert E.; Lopez, Micael; Slaughter, Katrina; Moore, Kathleen; Fader, Amanda N.

In: Gynecologic Oncology Reports, Vol. 22, 01.11.2017, p. 100-104.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Ricci, S, Tergas, AI, Long Roche, K, Fairbairn, MG, Levinson, KL, Dowdy, SC, Bristow, RE, Lopez, M, Slaughter, K, Moore, K & Fader, AN 2017, 'Geographic disparities in the distribution of the U.S. gynecologic oncology workforce: A Society of Gynecologic Oncology study', Gynecologic Oncology Reports, vol. 22, pp. 100-104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gore.2017.11.006
Ricci, Stephanie ; Tergas, Ana I. ; Long Roche, Kara ; Fairbairn, Melissa Gerardi ; Levinson, Kimberly L. ; Dowdy, Sean Christopher ; Bristow, Robert E. ; Lopez, Micael ; Slaughter, Katrina ; Moore, Kathleen ; Fader, Amanda N. / Geographic disparities in the distribution of the U.S. gynecologic oncology workforce : A Society of Gynecologic Oncology study. In: Gynecologic Oncology Reports. 2017 ; Vol. 22. pp. 100-104.
@article{18eb3572658140abb9d8a8816789f670,
title = "Geographic disparities in the distribution of the U.S. gynecologic oncology workforce: A Society of Gynecologic Oncology study",
abstract = "A recent ASCO workforce study projects a significant shortage of oncologists in the U.S. by 2020, especially in rural/underserved (R/US) areas. The current study aim was to determine the patterns of distribution of U.S. gynecologic oncologists (GO) and to identify provider-based attitudes and barriers that may prevent GOs from practicing in R/US regions. U.S. GOs (n = 743) were electronically solicited to participate in an on-line survey regarding geographic distribution and participation in outreach care. A total of 320 GOs (43{\%}) responded; median age range was 35–45 years and 57{\%} were male. Most practiced in an urban setting (72{\%}) at a university hospital (43{\%}). Only 13{\%} of GOs practiced in an area with a population < 50,000. A desire to remain in academics and exposure to senior-level mentorship were the factors most influencing initial practice location. Approximately 50{\%} believed geographic disparities exist in GO workforce distribution that pose access barriers to care; however, 39{\%} “strongly agreed” that cancer patients who live in R/US regions should travel to urban cancer centers to receive care within a center of excellence model. GOs who practice within 50 miles of only 0–5 other GOs were more likely to provide R/US care compared to those practicing within 50 miles of ≥ 10 GOs (p < 0.0001). Most (39{\%}) believed the major barriers to providing cancer care in R/US areas were volume and systems-based. Most also believed the best solution was a hybrid approach, with coordination of local and centralized cancer care services. Among GOs, a self-reported rural-urban disparity exists in the density of gynecologic oncologists. These study findings may help address barriers to providing cancer care in R/US practice environments.",
keywords = "Geographic disparities, Gynecologic cancer care",
author = "Stephanie Ricci and Tergas, {Ana I.} and {Long Roche}, Kara and Fairbairn, {Melissa Gerardi} and Levinson, {Kimberly L.} and Dowdy, {Sean Christopher} and Bristow, {Robert E.} and Micael Lopez and Katrina Slaughter and Kathleen Moore and Fader, {Amanda N.}",
year = "2017",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.gore.2017.11.006",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "22",
pages = "100--104",
journal = "Gynecologic Oncology Reports",
issn = "2211-338X",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Geographic disparities in the distribution of the U.S. gynecologic oncology workforce

T2 - A Society of Gynecologic Oncology study

AU - Ricci, Stephanie

AU - Tergas, Ana I.

AU - Long Roche, Kara

AU - Fairbairn, Melissa Gerardi

AU - Levinson, Kimberly L.

AU - Dowdy, Sean Christopher

AU - Bristow, Robert E.

AU - Lopez, Micael

AU - Slaughter, Katrina

AU - Moore, Kathleen

AU - Fader, Amanda N.

PY - 2017/11/1

Y1 - 2017/11/1

N2 - A recent ASCO workforce study projects a significant shortage of oncologists in the U.S. by 2020, especially in rural/underserved (R/US) areas. The current study aim was to determine the patterns of distribution of U.S. gynecologic oncologists (GO) and to identify provider-based attitudes and barriers that may prevent GOs from practicing in R/US regions. U.S. GOs (n = 743) were electronically solicited to participate in an on-line survey regarding geographic distribution and participation in outreach care. A total of 320 GOs (43%) responded; median age range was 35–45 years and 57% were male. Most practiced in an urban setting (72%) at a university hospital (43%). Only 13% of GOs practiced in an area with a population < 50,000. A desire to remain in academics and exposure to senior-level mentorship were the factors most influencing initial practice location. Approximately 50% believed geographic disparities exist in GO workforce distribution that pose access barriers to care; however, 39% “strongly agreed” that cancer patients who live in R/US regions should travel to urban cancer centers to receive care within a center of excellence model. GOs who practice within 50 miles of only 0–5 other GOs were more likely to provide R/US care compared to those practicing within 50 miles of ≥ 10 GOs (p < 0.0001). Most (39%) believed the major barriers to providing cancer care in R/US areas were volume and systems-based. Most also believed the best solution was a hybrid approach, with coordination of local and centralized cancer care services. Among GOs, a self-reported rural-urban disparity exists in the density of gynecologic oncologists. These study findings may help address barriers to providing cancer care in R/US practice environments.

AB - A recent ASCO workforce study projects a significant shortage of oncologists in the U.S. by 2020, especially in rural/underserved (R/US) areas. The current study aim was to determine the patterns of distribution of U.S. gynecologic oncologists (GO) and to identify provider-based attitudes and barriers that may prevent GOs from practicing in R/US regions. U.S. GOs (n = 743) were electronically solicited to participate in an on-line survey regarding geographic distribution and participation in outreach care. A total of 320 GOs (43%) responded; median age range was 35–45 years and 57% were male. Most practiced in an urban setting (72%) at a university hospital (43%). Only 13% of GOs practiced in an area with a population < 50,000. A desire to remain in academics and exposure to senior-level mentorship were the factors most influencing initial practice location. Approximately 50% believed geographic disparities exist in GO workforce distribution that pose access barriers to care; however, 39% “strongly agreed” that cancer patients who live in R/US regions should travel to urban cancer centers to receive care within a center of excellence model. GOs who practice within 50 miles of only 0–5 other GOs were more likely to provide R/US care compared to those practicing within 50 miles of ≥ 10 GOs (p < 0.0001). Most (39%) believed the major barriers to providing cancer care in R/US areas were volume and systems-based. Most also believed the best solution was a hybrid approach, with coordination of local and centralized cancer care services. Among GOs, a self-reported rural-urban disparity exists in the density of gynecologic oncologists. These study findings may help address barriers to providing cancer care in R/US practice environments.

KW - Geographic disparities

KW - Gynecologic cancer care

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85034595393&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85034595393&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.gore.2017.11.006

DO - 10.1016/j.gore.2017.11.006

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85034595393

VL - 22

SP - 100

EP - 104

JO - Gynecologic Oncology Reports

JF - Gynecologic Oncology Reports

SN - 2211-338X

ER -